[img]http://2.bp..com/-1UkCHg5-NI8/VFSRq4PwWmI/AAAAAAABNZ8/RXXoZHvAqw0/s1600/Speaker%2BTambuwal%2B1.jpg[/img]
The Speaker of the House of Reps, Aminu Tambuwal, has approached a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja to stop the Peoples Democratic Party and six others from removing him from office.

This came on the heels of his historic defection from the ruling PDP to the APC during the week.

The Speaker, who dressed in white flowing gown popularly called agbada and a white cap to match, was accompanied to the court premises by his supporters. He left the court premises shortly after completing the process with his lawyers.

Tambuwal prayed the court to hold that he remains a member of the House of Reps and its Speaker.
He further explained that he was elected the House’ Speaker on June 6, 2011 by members of the House, not because he was a member of the PDP, but by virtue of his being a member of the House.
He further explained that he had been a member of the New PDP faction of the party when it became factionalised late last year. He added that his faction of the PDP merged with the APC on November 26, 2013 and that by virtue of the merger he became a member of the APC.

According to the Speaker, the PDP still remains factionalised in his home state of Sokoto. This, he said, informed his decision to defect.

He also asked the court to grant an order of injunction restraining the defendants and their agents from taking any step to remove him from office as Speaker and member of the House or in any manner.

The six other respondents in the suit are PDP National Chairman, Deputy Speaker of the House, the Inspector-General of Police, the Independent National Electoral Commission and the Attorney-General of the Federation.

He said, “I know as a fact that all efforts to harmonise the factions of the PDP in my home state in Sokoto has failed as there are still factions in the state. I informed the members of the 3rd defendant (House of Reps) while announcing my decision to join the New PDP faction, who merged with the 2nd plaintiff (APC) that my membership of the 2nd plaintiff was based on the circumstances in my home state.”

Tambuwal further stated that since he announced his defection, PDP and its Chairman have consistently threatened to declare his seat vacant and withdraw all rights and benefits including security details attached to him.

The Speaker is praying the court for an order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants and their agents from taking any step or further steps to abrogate or diminish or take away or interfere with or infringe his rights and privileges as Speaker and a member of the House before the expiration of his term of office on June 5, 2015.

He is also seeking an order of perpetual injunction restraining INEC from accepting any nomination of candidates or otherwise organising or conducting a bye-election for the purpose of replacing him or taking over his seat as Speaker and member of the House before the expiration of his current tenure of office on June 5, 2015.

Tambuwal equally prayed the court to grant an order of mandatory injunction compelling the IGP and AGF to restore his security details and all other rights, benefits and opportunities appurtenant to members of and office of the Speaker of the House of Representatives.

The Speaker also seeks a declaration that the decisions or threatened decisions of all the defendants, except INEC, purporting or planning and or attempting to declare the seat of the 1st plaintiff in the 3rd defendant vacant as a member and Speaker thereof, is unlawful, unconstitutional and ultra vires the powers of the defendants

He is also seeking for a declaration that he remains a member and the Speaker of the 3rd defendant until the expiration of his current term of office on June 5, 2015 notwithstanding his membership of APC unless he is removed in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.


>>>>> http://www..com.ng/tambuwal-fights-back/

kk

waternogetenemy:
Playing to the gallery, even the crow knows the game is up...

the game is up in ur head.

k

waternogetenemy:
Playing to the gallery, even the crow knows the game is up...

u missed this morning news abi?

He forgets he's now a common man or can a common man go to court to ask to be given access to House of Rep, exercise in futility.

How time flies, just few days back the former speaker of HOR was forming Don Jazzy today he's drowning with no assurance of surviving.

worthytalk:
How time flies, just few days back the former speaker of HOR was forming Don Jazzy today he's drowning with no assurance of surviving.

His crook magic will fail this time around.

For those of you saying a minority has been speaker of house before, please note the reason why that happened:
"Thus passed into history, the life of an eminent Nigerian politician, who participated in the nurturing of our democratic culture during the two periods of post-military democracy. Chief Ume-Ezeoke burst into the political limelight when he emerged as the Speaker of the House of Representatives after the general elections of 1979. It was the first (and only time since then) that the head of an arm of our bicameral National Assembly would emerge from a political party that did not win the majority of seats in the parliament.
The reason for this unusual phenomenon was not farfetched. After the 1979 general elections, the National Party of Nigeria (NPN), which won the presidency and majority of the seats in both the Senate and House of Representatives could not fulfill the constitutionally required conditions to form government alone. It went into what was known as an accord with the third-placed Nigerian People’s Party (NPP), led by Dr. Nnamdi Azikiwe, in a power-sharing arrangement. Even though the accord later collapsed because the NPN was accused of poaching members of its coalition partner, Ume-Ezeoke kept his post till 1983 when another election was held".

http://www.vanguardngr.com/2011/10/edwin-ume-ezeoke-1935-%E2%80%93-2011/

ALLIANCE BETWEEN SE AND FULANI.
WERE THEY SLAVES TO FULANI BY THIS ACTION?
NO.
I LAUGH WHEN THE SAME PEOPLE CONDEMNS YORUBA FOR THEIR CHOICE OF ALLIANCE.

THE SHARED POWER IS ACTUALLY DIFFERENT FROM MERGER.
MERGER MEANS ONE GREAT PARTY.
BUT IN THIS CASE, INSIVIDUAL PARTY RETAINS ALL ITS IDENTITY.
THAT IS WHY ZIK COMPLAINED OF POACHING.
THAT POSITION OF SPEAKERSHIP MAY BE CONCEEDED TO ZIK'S PART IN THE POWER SHARING DEAL.
BUT IT IS CLEAR THAT UME EZEOKE IS A MINORIT PARTY REP.
MINORITY IR MAJORITY IS COMPLETELY NO WHERE FOUND IN OUR CONSTITUTION AS FAR AS SPEAKESHIP POST IS CONCERNED.

this is rubbish act from d Fg how could they withdrawn tambuwal security details this is bad from d Mr president .some thing called violence will happen if any thing happens to tambuwal if they assassinate tambuwal Gej will be killed as usual Cos' this is very bad a serving speaker.Gej should call his boys to order oooo.