Religion . . . has certain ideas at the heart of it which we call sacred or holy or whatever. What it means is, 'Here is an idea or a notion that you're not allowed to say anything bad about; you're just not. Why not? - because you're not!' If somebody votes for a party that you don't agree with, you're free to argue about it as much as you like; everybody will have an argument but nobody feels aggrieved by it. If there is need to ban okada nationally, u are free to have an argument about it. But on the other hand if somebody says 'I mustn't work on sunday', you say, 'I respect that'. Why should it be that it's perfectly legitimate to support the PDP or APC, Republicans or Democrats, this model of leadership verses that - but to have an opinion about how the Universe began, about who created the Universe . .. no, that's holy? . .. We are used to not challenging religious ideas but it's very interesting how much of a furore Richard creates when he does it! Everybody gets absolutely frantic about it because you're not allowed to say these things. Yet when you look at it rationally there is no reason why those ideas shouldn't be as open to debate as any other, except that we have agreed somehow between us that they shouldn't be.

Attention is drawn to the privileging of religion in public discussions of ethics in the media and in government. Whenever a controversy arises over sexual or reproductive morals,the opposition would respectfully tiptoe away. And it is no use claiming that this is an unfair parallel because apartheid has no rational justification. The whole point of religious faith, its strength and chief glory, is that it does not depend on rational justification. The rest of us are expected to defend our prejudices. But ask a religious person to justify their faith and you infringe 'religious liberty'.

"the notion that the values of Islam trump anyone else's - which is what any follower of Islam does assume, just as any follower of any religion believes that theirs is the sole way, truth and light. If people wish to love a 7th century preacher more than their own families, that's up to them, but nobody else is obliged to take it serious..." Mueller


Am not an atheist but a rationalist that believe in facts.
So there should be no biased mindset and abusive comments.



Source: Richard Dawkins

Story[s][/s]

do you want the Christians to rain holy ghost fire on you,or the Muslims to declare fatwa on you,be careful before someone justify sending to the great beyond

is religion delusional?
Is cocaine, weed addictive?

iamodenigbo1:
do you want the Christians to rain holy ghost fire on you,or the Muslims to declare fatwa on you,be careful before someone justify sending to the great beyond

i don't give a damn and still i am not really referring to particular religious believe but generalizing issues. Involving Buddha of China, Shinto of Japan, Hinduism of India etc

Peterken05:
is religion delusional?
Is cocaine, weed addictive?

Dont understand what u are talking about Broo

Religion is not conscious. I don't know if unconscious things can be delusional.

However, to the extent that a religion forbids adherents from examining their beliefs, it becomes a fertile ground for delusions. To be deluded is to be human tho, so everybody can take heart.

menesheh:


Dont understand what u are talking about Broo

the answer to both question is yes