Clark-Jonathan: What Reuben Abati missed
By Bunmi Makinwa


IT is not about Chief Edwin Kiagbodo Clark. It is about leadership, versus the aroma of it and scent that is often mistaken for purpose. Former Presidential Spokesperson Reuben Abati went to town on E.K. Clark’s reported disowning of his “son”, former President Goodluck Jonathan, who was Abati’s boss. From his vantage viewpoint inside the bowels of power when Clark called the shots around Jonathan, Abati knows very well what kind of “father-and-son” the President and his Godfather were.
Abati expressed clearly his disappointment with Clark in his piece, titled: “Clark, The father, Jonathan, The Son”. He said: “Who would ever think, Chief E.K. Clark would publicly disown President Jonathan? He says Jonathan was a weak President. At what point did he come to that realization? Yet, throughout the five years…of the Jonathan Presidency, he spoke loudly against anyone who opposed the President…”.
Abati ‘s agony about the “father” who called his “son” a nincompoop in so many words is comprehensible. Especially barely five months after the son was dethroned. But Abati missed many points of significance in seeking to arouse public sympathy for Jonathan and condemnation of Clark .
The first one is that he failed to say who Chief Edwin Clark is. Let us imagine a scenario: “What manner of a person are you”, it was asked. Hear the response: “I eat and I eat.” Yesterday it was Jonathan. Today it is Buhari. As it was before, so it is today, and forever. Such people inhabit the living rooms of power, and seek entry into the bedrooms. Once in the inner rooms, they are bosom friends of the boss, so-called insiders. Secondly, power attracts so-called followers.
They come in droves, sing, dance, and they even weep, if weeping is what the boss wants. They love the boss. They tell him only what he wants to hear. Thirdly, many people are available to advise and inform the boss of what to do and who to choose as collaborators. These advisers and informants claim space and time.
In a symbiotic relationship of sorts, the boss becomes a slave and appendage of the advisers and informants. Leadership disappears and parochialism, self interest dominate. Fourthly, “it is our turn” or “my ownersation” is a dream come true to a boss whose sentiments are at best confused. The boss finds many willing acolytes. When power “miss road”, its abuse becomes commonplace. Leadership comes to power with a sense of mission, purpose and direction.
What language Abati used for Clark can be used for many more people – appendages, dependents, opportunists, usurpers – who use closeness to power in pursuit of personal gains at the expense of the community, society.
Show me a leader who leaves power and maintains his key flock and I will show you leadership that galvanizes its people. If Clark abandons his son, it is not out of character. Behind closed doors or within limited public view there are many like-minded others following the same road of abandonment of yesterday’s group. There is a limit to followership that has as platform what-is-in-it-for-me. In the “chop-make-I-chop” politics that characterizes our polity, principles and ideologies are absent, or rare.

www.ngrguardiannews.com/2015/10/clark-jonathan-what-reuben-abati-missed/

Nairalandmaster no dey sleep at all? Na wa ooo

Father Clark has said it all , 'Jonathan was a weak President', albeit a good man, (i believe that personally), surrounded with thieves, rogues and beasts of no nation.

When Power 'miss road' it's abuse becomes a commonplace.

"Jonathan is a nincompoo"- E. K. Clark
" E. K. Clark is an usurper "- Abati
" Abati is Jonathan's Abobaku"- Bunmi Makinwa

#lobatan :the enemy of your enemy is a friend

Not actually opposing reuben..

Just saying he ought to know better than be surprised about the so called father