RevDesmondJuju:


Dear Boko ediot, here is a condensed NATO article on how to engage aircrafts that violate your airspace and it clearly shows THAT TURKEY HAS MASSIVELY BREACHED NATO ROE FOR INTERCEPTION OF ANY AIRCRAFT.

YOU MUST VISUALLY INTERCEPT THE AIRCRAFT AND HAVE VISUAL CONTACT WITH THE PILOT

IF THE AIRCRAFT IS ON AN EXIT COURSE OF AN EXTREMELY NARROW BAND OF AIRSPACE, INTERCEPTION IS UNCALLED FOR

AT THE HALFWAY POINT, AN AIRCRAFT ENCROACHING UPON AIRSPACE IF ON AN EXIT COURSE, HAS COMPLIED WITH WARNINGS AND ORDERS AND CANNOT BE FIRED UPON

THE MINUTE THE AIRCRAFT IS OUT OF YOUR AIRSPACE, IT CANNOT BE FIRED UPON AND YOU MUST TURN AROUND AND GO HOME

IF YOU KNOW THE PURPOSE OF AN AIRCRAFT OPERATING CLOSE TO THE BORDER, ACCIDENTAL ENCROACHMENT IS ALLOWED AND NECESSITATES NO SCRAMBLE OR INTERCEPTION, UNLESS THE AIRCRAFT IS ON A PATH INTO YOUR COUNTRY WITH NO DEFINED EXIT POINT. IF THE AIRCRAFT IS MILITARY AND CLEARLY ARMED, AN AIRBORNE SENTRY CONSISTING OF AN INTERCEPTION SQUADRON IS ENCOURAGED TO FLY A HOLDING PATTERN ALONG THE BORDER FOR QUICK TURNAROUND. (NOTE, THAT DOESNT HAVE SHOOTDOWN OR EVEN RADAR LOCK ANYWHERE IN THE DEFINITION OF TURN AROUND)

DO NOT FIRE UPON AN AIRCRAFT THAT IS LEAVING OR HAS LEFT AIRSPACE. IT IS AN ACT OF WAR THAT BARS YOU FROM INCITING ARTICLE 5, AS NATO IS A DEFENSIVE MILITARY ORGANIZATION AND ARTICLE 5 ONLY COVERS A NATION ATTACKING A NATO COUNTRY WITHOUT DIRECT PROVOCATION OF THAT COUNTRY, OR AN OBJECTIVE ACT OF WAR AGAINST YOUR NOW PRESENT AGGRESSOR.

http://www.nato.int/nato_static/assets/pdf/pdf_archives/20121128_19530312_NU_SHAPE-282-53_Rules_for_Engagement_of_Unidentifie.pdf

You are a fvcking Russian apologist.

The aircraft was not on an exit course.

It did not comply to ten warnings in five minutes of its encroachment on Turkish airspace.

The purpose of the Su-24 was unknown to Turkish authority.Five minutes is more than enough time for the fighter pilots to state the reason for their presence in Turkish territory.

Obviously your daft and obsolete brain failed to register to you that the jets had not left Turkish territory nor did they have a reason to continue into Turkey.

According to all NATO rules of engagement,Turkey had every right to shoot down the jet.