It's funny how comedians yab people and expect them to understand that they are just doing their jobs when they themselves cannot take jabs thrown at them. Basketmouth was performing at the olamide's concert when he threw a jab at freeze asking him if his wife allowed him to come out today, whether his wife didn't beat him before coming to the show.... but really basketmouth knew freeze had at a time had domestic issues with his wife and we all know that matters like that are really volatile nd it hurts. imagine making fun of a full fledged man like that in a crowd with people laughing. He now expected freeze to now start shining teeth with him as if freeze is a mugu or something.

Remember Helen Paul and Gordon's saga, how did Gordon react when Helen threw a jab at him? How did Helen react when Gordon reacted on stage?
Those calling for freeze's head should take a chill pill, we are all humans with emotions. Now how does basketmouth feel? I even think daddy freeze deserves an apology....#my opinion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89x9TMAA2Yk&itct=CCkQpDAYASITCP3PqLr9gcoCFUIPHAodL7wFwFIUZ29yZG9uIG5kIGhlbGVuIHBhdWw%3D&gl=NG&hl=en&client=mv-google

The future is "Intellectric", that is intelligent electricity-electric energy that is secure, clean and efficient. This is the
major challenge of electric engineering in different fields. The role of engineers is to integrate science, technology and
the business world and hence to make things happen. Engineering is about finding ways to modify the universe and
life in order to extend our biological reach, the quality of our lives, and the niches in which we can survive.
Technology is the means of improving human life by the application of all knowledge and experience. Innovation is
the successful introduction of something new. It is not enough to pursue the whys of nature or to find how we can
modify nature. We must also decide what we should do. If engineering is to have a strong say about the future, it
needs to become integrated with science, society and humanistic concerns. 21 century engineers will need to be
astute makers, trusted innovators, agents of change, master integrators, enterprise enablers, technology stewards and
knowledge handlers. Engineering should venture to develop new capabilities and a broader sense of mission. We
should integrate what we know, what we can do and what we should do. We should also be able to integrate the
biological organism, society and machines. We should strive to engineer a better tomorrow guided by a desire to give
future generations a greener, healthier and more harmonious world

Tackling climate change: Electricity on the front lines
Electricity currently accounts for 40% of carbon emissions produced by the energy sector,
or 25% of global greenhouse gas emissions. A direct link can be traced between this
current state of affairs and the generation mix used to keep up with ever increasing
demand for electricity: two-thirds fossil fuels (41% coal, 26% gas and oil) and one-third
carbon-free sources (14% nuclear, 16% hydroelectric, and 3% other renewables). Coal
generation emits roughly one tonne of CO2 per MWh compared with 450 kg for combined-
cycle gas turbine technology.
The IEA has made the point that the power sector is expected to account for 70% of the
emissions reductions required of the energy system by 2030 to limit the temperature
increase to 2°C. This will only be possible with simultaneous efforts in terms of demand-
side management, which the IEA scenario assumes will enable a 40% reduction in sector
emissions; massive reductions in emissions from electricity generation, with average
carbon content declining by 60% by 2030 and 90% by 2050; and, further downstream, the
replacement of fossil fuels with low-carbon electricity for an ever larger number of end-
uses (transportation, industry and housing).
The challenge may appear daunting but is by no means insurmountable. For the next two
decades, we already have low- and no-carbon generation technologies that are competitive.
On the demand side, technologies exist for a wide range of end-uses: thermal insulation in
buildings, efficient lighting, more efficient electric motors, heat pumps, solar-powered
water heaters, etc. Energy efficiency will make a key contribution in helping the electricity
sector reduce emissions. On paper, the cost associated with related measures could be
relatively low, but there is a need to monitor transaction costs, which are generally hidden
and can reflect asymmetric information, behavioral patterns, household budget
constraints, or the interests of the concerned parties (e.g. well-known problems that arise
between tenants and owners).

The role of public policies
There is thus no need to count on an as-yet-unidentified miracle technology to set lofty
targets for decarbonizing the electricity sector. On the other hand, the transformation will
come at a cost, one that must absolutely be kept in line by collectively forging public
policies that create efficient incentives for consumers and producers. These policies should
meet three criteria.
Firstly, they must be geared more to the long term. Time constants are long in the power
industry: investment processes require three to 15 years, while plants are designed to
remain in service for between 30 and 60 years, and the corresponding transmission and
distribution infrastructure at least that long. A building’s lifespan can exceed 100 years.
It is generally difficult at an institutional level to set regulations that provide visibility over
several decades. At the same time, the stability and predictability of market regulations
over long periods depends in large part on how costs to society are kept in check. If there
are doubts about these costs being efficiently managed, the risk of reversals in public
policy increases considerably. A good illustration is the way in which solar incentives have
been available in fits and starts in Germany and Spain: since feed-in tariff instruments
did not control the quantities deployed, an unexpected surge in total subsidy amounts led
the governments of these countries to abruptly change their policies.