TheFreeOne:
I beg to disagree. Fayose guber election has been laid to rest at the supreme court.

As for those who still believed Fayose rigged, I say they are on a long thing cos should that election be conducted again with Tinubu or Buhari as candidates it will still be a landslide for oshokomole.

The undeniable fact: Fayose is a grassroot politician, very popular and acceptable to his people.

mapet:


1. That Fayose won the election as confirmed by Supreme court is different from the precedent that needs to be set to deter election rigging and wanton wastage of our resources just to pursue election as a do or die affair.
2. Fayose was seen on video planning the rigging of an election. The facts of the video as corroborated by Aluko is what played out. This needs to be investigated and culprits brought to book
3. It is the perogative of the Ekiti people to keep voting Fayose, if they so please. But it is our collective responsibility to make sure our money is not spent illegally and the 4.7billion Illegally spent to "execute" Fayose's election in Ekiti needs to be recovered

seunmsg:


The question is, can he be charged for electoral fraud even as an incumbent governor? That is the question Femi Falana tried to answer and I think I agree with his argument. If governors can be charged to court to defend their election, then, it's logical to say they can be charged for electoral fraud irrespective of the immunity clause.

mapet:


1. That Fayose won the election as confirmed by Supreme court is different from the precedent that needs to be set to deter election rigging and wanton wastage of our resources just to pursue election as a do or die affair.
2. Fayose was seen on video planning the rigging of an election. The facts of the video as corroborated by Aluko is what played out. This needs to be investigated and culprits brought to book
3. It is the perogative of the Ekiti people to keep voting Fayose, if they so please. But it is our collective responsibility to make sure our money is not spent illegally and the 4.7billion Illegally spent to "execute" Fayose's election in Ekiti needs to be recovered

kajoula:


of proven otherwise, then.......The film just started.
he will get the worse humiliation ever, in the history of Nigeria.

flokii:
where my ife repogirl na..

i need to hear her view on this

repogirl:
lol, na ban ooooo, they banned me for speaking my mind to some bloody idiot. Anyway am back now!

So They say they can indict him, make them indict and prove their case na. We all know the judiciary has kuku been hijacked by Boooohari and cohorts.

flokii:




you must sha attack Buhari... part of d reason I like you

so you dnt see.anything wrong with what fayose did?

repogirl:
he hasn't been indicted yet, has he?

Besides I don't believe all this rubbish claims. They went to court before, swore before an oath, held a trial with witnesses that testified the election was devoid of malpractice... Now, months later, that Aluko man who was a witness that testified in the previous hearing that everything was done rightly just opens his mouth and begins spilling all sorts....abeg would you take that guy as a credible witness?

Someone who has already lied on oath previously? He could be lying again for all we know.

See, I don't bother about politics and the law in Nigeria, we all know its whoever has more powerful allies that wins in the end, every other thing na wash.

flokii:


lol.. naso

repo come.marry me too na.. so we wuld be rubbing minds

you too sabi.. i swear

repogirl:
lol, too late. Na till death do us part I dey so.

flokii:


nna mehnn...

and you dnt av any sister that's yet to marry.. a.smart mind like you

repogirl:
lol, my sisters are not exactly searching at the moment.

ddippset:
It just defies common sensibility and human justice if the supreme court cannot overrule itself sometimes. If a man gets acquitted for murder at a supreme court and then tomorrow someone produces a vídeo of the man actually committing the murder and takes it to the Supreme Court would the court now say this matter has already been judged, Mr murderer go home and relax, nothing do you!? If that's what our law says then the law is fuccked! Or if the supreme court discharges and aqcuits Óscar pistorious for instance and tomorrow someone produces a cctv footage of him actually shooting at reeva steemkamp, or maybe Mr pistorious confesses to the crime, só the supreme court will say Mr pistorious' case cannot be revisited?

Bigchief46:

Have you heard of "double jeopardy"? No? Then read it up; it's a Constitutional matter as well & you don't need to curse the Courts: no one can be tried twice for the same offence. That is the same principle world wide & I hope you know we inherited our judicial system from the "Oyibos". Every person now feels free to come to social media; assume a moral high ground and abuse our Courts; no wahala. If the O.J. Simpson case had been tried in Nigeria & the same verdict reached; you guys would have lynched the Judge. Smh

flokii:


Hmmn..

odikwa.. vewi serious

mayb we'd clone you then... abi na?

repogirl:
oya na, you have my permission to. Lol.

Blitz888:
Sounds like its going to be another political blockbuster... keenly following though!

kajoula:


coming soon

Blitz888:
how soon Miss?

ddippset:
forget what the constitution says, forget what the oyibos do, forget what the principles are. You are a human being and God gave you logic and reasoning. What does your common sense tell you? The summary of my post is; if the supreme court cannot reverse itself whatever it recognizes an error in its judgement then something is wrong. The supreme judges are not infallible and are not gods. Take note: iam not saying this to make a case against fayose(that seems to be your worry) iam only dusgusted by a law which forbids the supreme court from reversing it's decision even in a glaring case of error.

Bigchief46:

Okay Sir, I get it: we should forget what our CONSTITUTION says; we should forget what our SUPREME COURT says; we should forget what established principles say; we should forget what oyibos do; we should abide by what YOU, as the all-knowing says. It doesn't occur to you to contemplate that contrary to your ARROGANT know-all disposition, there might in fact be very good reasons of public policy distilled over many years of jurisprudence for this position of the law. Okayoooooo, you do well

Montaque:


U should know that part of the grounds furnished by APC during the tribunal was The use of the military to rig the election. despite the prove of that, the court upheld the election. The SC affirmed that. If fresh evidence emerged after the finality of the decision of the supreme court on the matter, it cannot be re litigated again.
even if fayose is indicted by the panel as set up, they can only wait till he ceases to be governor. it has been held by the SC that immunity cannot bar proper investigation by the police. But jurisdiction to present those evidence in court is inchoate during the Tenure of the accused.
In fact, the cases Falana mentioned were all to the effect that election petition tribunal has jurisdiction over the elected governor over the election process, and that he cannot hide under immunity to avoid being a party at the tribunal. However in this case, the tribunal has given its judgement and is at now, functus officio.
I will advise that they gather their evidence till 2018, when he ceases to be governor.

mapet:


I think you miss my points, which are
1. Fayose was declared winner......not in doubt
2. Military tribunal in effect was about the role the military played
3. The allegation of 4.7billion needs to be investigated

these are distinct issues

TheFreeOne:


I'm not holding fort for Fayose but can you avail us a copy of the video As for the money in question time will tell to reveal all things.

APC should learn to accept defeat and stop crying over spilled milk lest they derail our democracy cos some judgments ain't in their favour.

ddippset:
you have got comprehension problems.

TheFreeOne:
I beg to disagree. Fayose guber election has been laid to rest at the supreme court.

As for those who still believed Fayose rigged, I say they are on a long thing cos should that election be conducted again with Tinubu or Buhari as candidates it will still be a landslide for oshokomole.

The undeniable fact: Fayose is a grassroot politician, very popular and acceptable to his people.