In this matter of false tax information representation, the decision of the Court of Appeal completely counters the former decision of the Supreme Court that ordered the Federal High Court to look  into the matter based on its merit, the Supreme Court also agreed with the High Court on the issue of jurisdiction , but the Court of Appeal decision has turn around to reject all position agreed by the Supreme Court.



It is either the Appeal Court is now above the Supreme Court or our legal system has been so compromised that our judges no longer value higher decisions.

Based on the decisions of Appeal Court yesterday, it clearly shows that the Supreme Court has alot to do concerning this matter.

***************************************

Please read this news which emanated from the Supreme Court decision ordering the High Court to judge the matter based on merit (Sahara Reporters)

***************************************

The governor of Abia state, Okezie Ikpeazu is in fresh trouble as the Nigerian Supreme Court has ordered the Federal High Court to retry  the case challenging the fraudulent payment of taxes that enabled his qualification to contest the governorship election of the state.



 

Some of his opponents in the  People’s Democratic Party led by Obasi Uba Ekagbara and Chukuemeka Mba had dragged him to the Federal High Court via suit FHC/ABJ/ CS/1086/2014 over his eligibility to contest in the primary election conducted for governorship aspirants of the party in the state during the last election in 2015. Even though he won the primary, his opponents alleged that he did not qualify to contest as he did not pay his taxes of years 2011, 2012 and 2013 as at when due.

 

The plaintiffs dragged Ikpeazu, the People’s Democratic Party and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and produced convincing evidence at the Federal High Court that taxes allegedly paid for the three years were paid on the same day and therefore faulted the authenticity of Ikpeazu’s tax clearance certificate and the information contained in his INEC “Form CF100″. Ikpeazu had no answer to the allegations but challenged the competence of the Federal High Court Abuja to hear the case. The trial court overruled his objection, but the Court of Appeal sided with him and ruled that the case ought to have been filed at the Abia State High Court.

 

Dissatisfied with the judgment Ikpeazu’s opponents took the matter to the Supreme Court. In its judgment handed down last Friday by five Supreme Court justices led by Justice Mohammed Muntaka -Coomassie, the court faulted the decision of the Court of Appeal and affirmed the competence of the Federal High Court Abuja to try the case.The justices then remitted the case back to the Federal High Court for the expedited trial of the tax fraud case challenging the eligibility of Ik[eazu to contest the governorship election. And to ensure that the hearing is not delayed the Supreme Court ordered the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court of Nigeria to ensure that  the case is heard and determined expeditiously.
Sauce:Abia facts newspaper

Every sane person who has been following abia politics since 2014 knows that abia false facebook paper fabricated by sons of Lucifer, agents of darkness, the likes of igwe Samuel and other unrepentant haters will not rest and will do anything to discredit anything that favours Ipkeazu. They have sworn with their worthless life that they will never stop hating Ipkeazu or Ngwans untill they meet their Waterloo

The Court of Apeal has knowingly or unknowingly set up some sort of procedural precedence that would almost be difficult for d Supreme Court to divulged from. The Supreme Court is a traditional Court it would almost always want to take d stance of proceedings adopted in d Court of Apeal except in very rare circumstances.

The Supreme Court would certainly want most cases to end in d Court of Apeal without subverting or compromising that Court's authority. Except in very high profile poltical cases where d Supreme Court had to reluctantly over turned d decision of d Court of Apeal. The Court of Apeal during d Gubernatorial proceedings in d South-South exhibited and pandered to sentimentality.

Those cases like d Gubernatorial elections of d South-South Governors. These decisions were based on a balanice of probability not circumstantial and definitely not based on sentimentality. Every Tom and Dick and even Harry knew d PDP was very strong in d South-South so it would have being inconcievable , foolhardy and judicial recklessness for d Supreme Court to toe d line of partisanship in face of glaring public knowledge.

The APC would have needed to come out with a prima facia case or a smoking gun for d Supreme Court to back them. Circumstantial or hearsay would not hold water. Especially not in d face of an outright boycott in election proceedings by APC in Rivers state.

Who si this zombie posting rubbish.

not over until is over.