111

exmuslim1:

Yes learn manners, i did not in anyway cuss you, so i wonder why you started your reply with cussing.

exmuslim1:
And now you think I haven't heard " ash hadu ana Muhammada rasulullah" and about jinns. Just listen to yourself. Your mind is trapped like every other Muslim, you'll never reason correctly unless you think outside the box.

Thats not the point, you claim only lukman was a rosul, and I'm telling you that Muhammad was Also rosul, so it shows you know nothing about islam, and I'm not saying you dont know about jinns, i just explained how the thing works.

111

111

exmuslim1:
Just when I think I know how dumb people really are. Pay attention to this thread before you make claims, I already talked about this.

You said Allaah was wrong about having absolute knowledge (i.e he alone does), so i ask you if you can tell me what will happen in the next 5mins even if I'm close to you?

No matter how you cuss me out, i wont pay attention to it, my aim is to expose you.

exmuslim1:
I said Lukman was a Rasul but not a Nabiy. Please and please, stop twisting my words.

Unfortunately all rasuls are nabis, i tell you, you know nothing.

111

111

111

111

exmuslim1:
Lol. Dude, Lukman is a rasul and not a nabiy. Glean your data again.

Sorry to burst your bubble, lukman was not even a rosul neither was he a prophet he was just an extremely wise man, although there are narrations that state that he was a prophet, they are all weak. The correct view is that he was an extremely wise man.

111

.

exmuslim1:
It's very simple. You show me that "face" in that statement has a racial specification.

nope you made a claim, you are to prove it, how would you make a claim and expect me to prove or disprove it? i wont even bother myself about this, as every rational person will see this foul play in that.

exmuslim1:
Whoever taught you this is more than wrong. Not all Rasuls are Nabiys.

ok, who is rosul and who is a nabiy?

111

exmuslim1:
Lol. Me? I'm not trying to get rid of you, you'll leave yourself. And I'm answering this for the second time, my act was tied to revealing "what the hearts conceal" not what'll happen in the future.

then you dont have the knowlegde Allaah talks about, moreover that verse was specifically talking to the people of quraish when they thought Allaah knows not about what the hide.

111

exmuslim1:
Did you know you just fvcked up? I've been waiting for the others to serve me this card since yesterday, apparently they know nothing even about Lukman. But I'm glad you do. Lukman is seen as a wise man, not a Nabiy or Rasul by some. These controversies simply buttresses the point that they're racist. Why is the only controversy about who's a prophet and who's not on Lukman( who was black)?

No controversy, it is clear the Quran didnt specifically call him a prophet or messenger neither did the authentic ahadith of the prophet, and as Muslims we dont make claims that Allaah or his messenger did not informed us about, and again you are making another claim that he was discriminited because he was black, so the onus lies on you to prove that;

1) he was discriminated

2) discriminated because he was black.

111

exmuslim1:
No. Please bother. You brought that text up. Now you tell me how it appeals to racial specification.

I brought another Hadith were the prophet said, the most honourable in the sight of Allaah is the one with more piety, so this debunks your claim, however you gave a suggestion and asked me to prove that suggestion?

111

exmuslim1:
And your point is? How does this prove me wrong? I never told you I was predicting the future. Where did you get that from?

my point is, the Quran wasnt wrong as you alleged, it was speaking about a specific incidence.

exmuslim1:
Lol. This is more than justified due to the controversy. They have no problem in blacks fighting and dying for the wars of their ancestors. But their opinions are distorted when it comes to a black man being a messenger.

how is their opinion distorted? is it that the Quran mentioned him to be a nabiy or a rosul and they disagreed?

111

exmuslim1:
Of course. I know that Hadith. But clearly, you're better at this card game than the other morons. Now this led to me claiming, why would the "prophet of Allah" be so contradictory. Why would he make a statement, and why would another statement say the opposite.

Mr it is a very clear statement, for Allaah not to look at faces it means, he doesnt care if you are white or black or red indian and so on, or you want to move on to playing with semantics?

111

exmuslim1:
Of course. I know that Hadith. But clearly, you're better at this card game than the other morons. Now this led to me claiming, why would the "prophet of Allah" be so contradictory. Why would he make a statement, and why would another statement say the opposite. You debunked this with his last khutbah, but why are there more of these racist statements than the opposite. Water don pass garri.

bring all the "racist" statements WITH REFERENCE and get the proper explanations on them.

exmuslim1:
You ask them. Or maybe we should put the blame on Allah for being racist.

unfortunately for you Allaah replies that;

"O mankind, indeed We have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another. Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah [size=13pt]is the most righteous of you[/size]. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Acquainted." {Quran 49:13}

+++

+++