Breaking news about Iceland country incredible but true if you are interested read the full story Iceland team was able to achieve an unprecedented achievement in the European after sending England packing Iceland will hope to spring an even more dramatic surprise on one of Europe’s footballing superpowers in the quarter finals as they take on hosts France.


Thanks to this win, Iceland became a place of world attention and deliberated some news sites a number of amusing news related to this
As the number of population of the country and its customs and traditions Perhaps the most prominent of our attention the story that it’s because of the high proportion of females than males have resorted government of that country to the solution is to grant $5,000 per month per immigrant marries Icelandic, and that the priority in this resolution will go to North Africa’s population.

Khd95:
Obviously,the bible said nothing bout that

johntredon:
[s]All the three religions have the solution to their problem of insufficient husband.[/s]

In earlier times, Christian men were permitted as many wives as they wished, since the Bible puts no restriction on the number of wives. It was only a couple of centuries ago that the Church restricted the number of wives to one.

[s]In Judaism, According to Talmudic law, Abraham had 2 wives, and Solomon had hundreds of wives.[/s]

In islam, it gives a man permission to marry two, three or four women, only on the condition that he deals with them justly. In the same chapter i.e. Surah Nisa verse 129 says: 'It is very difficult to be just and fair between women'. [Al-Qur'an (4:129)]

Ranchhoddas:
Wow. Na to find visa to Iceland sure pass now.

lexiconkabir:
First, this isn't a Christianity versus Islam or Judaism thing, so I see no reason why you should delve into other religions, we are talking about Christianity, however being a Muslim, I will give explanation to that verse you quoted, and hope you leave it at that and face the original topic at hand.






Really? I'm hearing this for the first time, pls shed more light.





Let me clear the thing up, the verse is indicates that just treatment is a condition for plural marriage to be permitted. If a man is afraid that he will not be able to treat his wives justly if he marries more than one, then it is forbidden for him to marry more than one. What is meant by the justice that is required in order for a man to be permitted to have more than one wife is that he should treat his wives equally in terms of spending, clothing, spending the night with them and other material things that are under his control.

With regard to justice or fairness in terms of love, he is not held accountable for that, and that is not required of him because he has no control over that. This is what is meant by the verse;

“You will never be able to do perfect justice between wives even if it is your ardent desire”[Al-nisa verse 129]

I hope you now have the original understanding of the verse.

johntredon:
The topic was not meant for debate among all the religions but to she'd more light that the only solution for them is, let the government legalize polygamy in the country you will see that the number of unmarried will reduce drastically and the government pay the said amount to those citizens who marry more than one wife.

In earlier times, Christian men were permitted as many wives as they wished, since the Bible puts no restriction on the number of wives. It was only a couple of centuries ago that the Church restricted the number of wives to one.

lexiconkabir:
Disclaimer: This thread wasn't opened for trolling, but to understand some things that has disturbing me for sometime


[size=15pt]Due To Insufficient Men, Iceland Will Pay $5,000 Per Month To Immigrants Who Marry Icelandic Women![/size]




source: http://sundayadelajablog.com/due-insufficient-men-iceland-will-pay-5000-per-month-immigrants-marry-icelandic-women/

cc: seun, lalasticlala, dominique

4everGod:



Op your post is conclusively saying that iceland views their women as a commodity and can fteely place a price tag on them such ad $5000 and encourage absolutely anyone even killers or criminald to come and take them.

You on the other hand are also failing to see that you have consciously also tagged women as a commodity which can be let go at a price.

Women are not commodities and every woman should be proud of themselves regardless of how they are viewed.

How can a government make such a declaration. Rather than place a pricetag on your single ladies why not give them the $5000 monthly so they can grow themselves intellectually and socially and real men with value would come for them easily or better still, open up their borders and encourage cross trading or student exchange programmes.

You fail to see the insult on women with your post. So all men should see these women as their meal ticket?

[s]Pls OP take down this thread. Its insulting to women and absolutely annoying.[/s]

lexiconkabir:


How sweet...

Well, I found this disheartening too this morning which was why I opened the thread since the area is a Christian dominated area according to wikipedia, there should be a better solution to the issue instead of "selling" women, hence the topic of this thread which you failed to address:

WHAT IS THE SOLUTION CHRISTIANITY PROFER TO THIS ISSUE?

4everGod:



My first comment on this thread should not in any way imply to you that your thread makes any sense. It does not! It wad purely complimentary.

If you knew what Christianity is and what it stands for then you would never use a governments decision to equate Christianity or the word of God.

I can tell you are a muslim or an ex muslim atheist which is why you do not find your very thread disturbing since islam already views women as commodities and nothing else.

Pls do not quote me again.

udatso:
4everGod you seem upset. Is it wrong for someone to ask a question about Christianity? What really are you upset about that is making you to over react?

4everGod:



Sorry I am not upset. I am irritated that someone would make such a thread in the guise of asking Christianity for answers when he is actually mocking Christianity with it being the muslim he is.

His analogy is that Islams way of permitting its followers of marrying 4 wives is wise and the best way forward using iceland as an example as to him it helps decongest the population of women.

So he freely views women as a commodity. I see through his thread easily and I suggest you read between the lines and know that what he is simply doing is an Islam vs Christianity comparison which is irritating to me.

4everGod:


So he freely views women as a commodity. I see through his thread easily and I suggest you read between the lines and know that what he is simply doing is an Islam vs Christianity comparison which is irritating to me.

lexiconkabir:

How sweet...
Well, I found this disheartening too this morning which was why I opened the thread since the area is a Christian dominated area according to wikipedia, there should be a better solution to the issue instead of "selling" women, hence the topic of this thread which you failed to address:
WHAT IS THE SOLUTION CHRISTIANITY PROFER TO THIS ISSUE?

4everGod:



Sorry I am not upset. I am irritated that someone would make such a thread in the guise of asking Christianity for answers when he is actually mocking Christianity with it being the muslim he is.

His analogy is that Islams way of permitting its followers of marrying 4 wives is wise and the best way forward using iceland as an example as to him it helps decongest the population of women.

So he freely views women as a commodity. I see through his thread easily and I suggest you read between the lines and know that what he is simply doing is an Islam vs Christianity comparison which is irritating to me.

Obviously,the bible said nothing bout that

[size=17pt]^^ [/size]
The thread wasn't opened to make fun of Christianity

No, The Government Will Not Pay You To Marry An Icelander



Published July 1, 2016

A widely-circulated hoax article is making claims that has provoked bemusement and bewilderment on Icelandic social media.

Over at least the past week now, numerous Icelandic women on Facebook have attested to being practically spammed with friend requests from non-Icelandic men that they do not know. It turns out that this may be linked to this article, which makes the following claim:

“Perhaps the most prominent of our attention the story that it’s because of the high proportion of females than males have resorted government of that country to the solution is to grant $ 5,000 per month per immigrant marries Icelandic, and that the priority in this resolution will go to North Africa’s population”

In case you were in doubt, everything about this claim is false.

First of all, the latest population data actually shows slightly more men than women in Iceland, with 1,007 men for every 1,000 women in general; in Reykjavík, there are 985 men for every 1,000 women, but in the countryside the ratio is 1,129 men for every 1,000 women.

Second, the Icelandic government absolutely does not have any kind of grant in place for immigrants who marry Icelanders, regardless of gender.

As such, if you do want to marry an Icelander, you should do so without the expectation of a cash payout, because none will be forthcoming.

http://grapevine.is/news/2016/07/01/no-the-government-will-not-pay-you-to-marry-an-icelander/

lexiconkabir:
Disclaimer: This thread wasn't opened for trolling, but to understand some things that has disturbing me for sometime


[size=15pt]Due To Insufficient Men, Iceland Will Pay $5,000 Per Month To Immigrants Who Marry Icelandic Women![/size]




source: http://sundayadelajablog.com/due-insufficient-men-iceland-will-pay-5000-per-month-immigrants-marry-icelandic-women/

cc: seun, lalasticlala, dominique

4everGod:



Sorry I am not upset. I am irritated that someone would make such a thread in the guise of asking Christianity for answers when he is actually mocking Christianity with it being the muslim he is.

His analogy is that Islams way of permitting its followers of marrying 4 wives is wise and the best way forward using iceland as an example as to him it helps decongest the population of women.

So he freely views women as a commodity. I see through his thread easily and I suggest you read between the lines and know that what he is simply doing is an Islam vs Christianity comparison which is irritating to me.

Thousands of African men fooled into believing Iceland will pay $5000 for them to marry women from there


By The Southern Daily South Africa - September 17, 2016
Iceland’s Foreign Ministry has received dozens of inquiries from men interested in taking up the Icelandic government’s offer of $5,000 to marry an Icelandic woman and make up for the lack of men in the country.

Unfortunately for the interested gentlemen, news of the exciting offer is a not-so-elaborate hoax posted on a website called ‘The Spirit Whispers’.

“Because of the high proportion of females than males have resorted government of that country to the solution is to grant $ 5,000 per month per immigrant marries Icelandic,” reads the article, in decidedly ropy English.

Priority apparently goes to men from North Africa, but all those “interested in this offer” were encouraged to leave a comment under the article.

Despite the exceedingly questionable nature of the posting, dozens of men have reportedly contacted Iceland’s Foreign Ministry to get more information on this too-good-be-true offer.

Every enquiry has been personally answered – obviously to the effect that the piece is a complete hoax and that there is absolutely no initiative in place to pay foreign men to come to Iceland and marry local women.
http://thesoutherndaily.co.za/index.php/2016/09/17/5000-to-marry-iceland-women-hoax/

udatso:

Oh I get your point. So are you saying you would have answered the question if lexiconkabir wasn't a Muslim?

4everGod:


No! My response already declares my position. Christian or muslim its a terrible thing to assume eomen are to be seen as people with a price tag.

lexiconkabir:
OK then! Good its false.

lexiconkabir:
OK then! Good its false.

ymdo:
Pls, explain your signature

lexiconkabir:


Explanation of the first part;

Salaf literally means predecessor, so in this context they are the predecessors of the religion, these predecessors got their understanding of Islam from the companions of the prophet, and of course the companions got their understanding from the prophet, therefore there is so much good if we follow their understanding of Islam because that is the pristine Islam the prophet taught.

Explanation of the second part:

Khalaf literally means successor so they are the ones that came after the salafs, so every newly invented things they brought into the religion is evil, and makes the religion distorted.

So in nutshell, shun whatever innovations you see from the khalafs and follow the understanding of the salafs since that was the original Islam taught.

And Allaah knows best.