tempem:
Lol.. It's not true..
Applying the Bible's practical advice will make you believe more in it's author..

akintom:

Yes, as long as you remain intellectually dishonest.

Niflheim:
@akintom,

Expecting honesty from a christian, is like expecting "intelligence" from Pinkie in "Pinkie and the Brain!!!"...............................It is at best, a fantasy, but at worst, a costly error!!!

Pidgin2:
OP, the devil is tormenting you, move on with your life and continue with your atheism if it pleases you. Open your eyes, you are wasting your time engaging in pointless debates, go and live free, you are in bondage without Christ, He is the only one that can set you free before you know it you will be old, a word should be enough for you

Sapiosexuality:
Atheism is not a position of superior knowledge either. Like I've been asking your fellow atheists, 'How is Atheism Logical?

akintom:

You're an evidence of how morbidly and intellectually dishonest, christards are.

It's obvious that you don't understand a word in logic. If not you wouldn't be asking atheists, how god idea is both primitive and idiotic.

akintom:

Of course, the very devil that gave you forbidden fruit to eat in the garden of eden, still possesses you.

If not, you and your fellow christards wouldn't be fighting him, all the time that you gather in those fools' house.

Sapiosexuality:
Don't make it simplistic. I'm not arguing for God or for theism but questioning the basis on which any deluded person calls other deluded people deluded.

So, Mr Atheist, how is atheism a logical position? How is atheism not a worse display of arrogant ignorance?

Don't try to use God as your helping hand. Show me you are better than theists lime you claim to be. If theists are dumb how does an atheist know and still calls himself an atheist? Go on, you have the floor.

Pidgin2:


You are in bondage, you cannot do without criticizing Christians everyday, you are in bondage

Sapiosexuality:
Don't make it simplistic. I'm not arguing for God or for theism but questioning the basis on which any deluded person calls other deluded people deluded.

So, Mr Atheist, how is atheism a logical position? How is atheism not a worse display of arrogant ignorance?

Don't try to use God as your helping hand. Show me you are better than theists lime you claim to be. If theists are dumb how does an atheist know and still calls himself an atheist? Go on, you have the floor.

BaEnki:


Hello!

Arguing for or against any choice of belief can easily renders anyone an ignoramus which I've chosen to avoid, our views on the same topic are always subjective and parallel, you can call my house white while I see it as black, though in my mind based on my on definition.

If you find peace in whatever you do, continue doing it.

akintom:

Which illogical proposition in atheism, are you referring to specifically?

BaEnki:


Hello!

Arguing for or against any choice of belief can easily renders anyone an ignoramus which I've chosen to avoid, our views on the same topic are always subjective and parallel, you can call my house white while I see it as black, though in my mind based on my on definition.

If you find peace in whatever you do, continue doing it.

frank317:


Nice one but the problem is... If God exists how what should he do about our differences? If you, an ordinary human can understand this fact about human? How then should our creator handle it... Why the silence?

BaEnki:


Hello!

Arguing for or against any choice of belief can easily renders anyone an ignoramus which I've chosen to avoid, our views on the same topic are always subjective and parallel, you can call my house white while I see it as black, though in my mind based on my on definition.

If you find peace in whatever you do, continue doing it.

Sapiosexuality:
Very good. I'm impressed.

It is not an illogical proposition in Atheism but Atheism is the illogical proposition. I've been thinking: 'If absence of evidence is not evidence of presence(or absence) on what ground is atheism logical?'

The question is, how was atheism arrived at from rational thought?

akintom:

By Frank Fernandez

This is your first problem. Atheist don't say that there's no god. Atheists say that they don't believe the claim that God exists. These are two very different things.

One is the rejection of a positive claim. The other is a positive claim. Someone who says they don't believe in a God has no need to disprove the God claim.

The burden of proof lies on the person making the claim. If you claim that a god does exist then it's YOUR job to prove it. It's not the other person's job to prove it false.

If someone says the there is no God, they are now making a claim that does carry a burden of proof. But we atheists don't claim that God, in fact, does not exist. We simply reject the claims that one does.

So you can toss all the word salads you want. But you're not gonna pin the burden of proof on us. You claim that God is real, then it's your job to prove it. Plain and simple.

akintom:


It's obvious you're badly hurt in the anterior sphere of the orifice.

Sorry, you didn't have to repeat the "bondage". lol

Sapiosexuality:
Very good. So what atheism has is a 'BELIEF' and not a 'FACT' that there's no God? A simply yes will do.

akintom:

You may have to read this simple piece again. If you understand what the piece explained in simple English, you wouldn't ask this question.

Sapiosexuality:
Twenty four words to criticize instead of a Yes or No.

From your definition(leave the unnecessary part) Atheism is just a Belief there is no God. Would I be wrong to say atheists, in defence of atheism, build their conclusions on "Faith" based premises?

akintom:

Absence of evidence.

Omoluabi16:
You are in BONDAGE.

Sapiosexuality:
Logically, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Obviously you don't agree, so tell me, how is absence of evidence the evidence for which any rational thought be built for absence of existence?

If in a hide-and-seek game, the one whose turn is it to search searches for his/her peers and couldn't find them, absence of evidence occur, would that form a rational basis for the evidence of absence? Explain.

Jeromejnr:
The OP is in bondage.

akintom:
https://www.nairaland.com/3672486/absence-evidence-evidence-absence

Sapiosexuality:
Your thread didn't say how absence of evidence is evidence of absence. Maybe you should read it again. You see, I stake my handle, if you can prove to me how Absence of Evidence is Evidence of Absence(How Atheism is Logical) I'd DEACTIVATE this account.

Sapiosexuality:


If in a hide-and-seek game, the one whose turn is it to search searches for his/her peers and couldn't find them, absence of evidence occur, would that form a rational basis for the evidence of absence? Explain.