if you are open minded and understand these basic fallacies such as :
Strawman
red herring
non sequitor
Ad hominem

then let's get talking, if you don't, go google and understand them, then we can get talking ait? if u won't then don't waste my time

baba no start abeg this sun too hot....


just look my signature

Blogthug:
if you are open minded and understand these basic fallacies such as :
Strawman
red herring
non sequitor
Ad hominem

then let's get talking, if you don't, go google and understand them, then we can get talking ait? if u won't then don't waste my time

dat is a white elephant project blive me

I would gladly take you up IF you also adhere by these

1. don't argue from ignorance eg "We don't know, therefore god" aka Argumentum ad ignorantum

2. don't argue for a god devoid of claims aka deistic god because most atheists like me feel there's no need arguing against the existence of one and if it does exist, there's no difference in believing it does or it doesn't as it's more of an indifferent god
If this god doesn't intervene in the universe, he is indistinguishable from a God that just doesn't exist in the first place.

Why can't God heal diseases?
Yahweh, Allah and Jesus all healed the sick in the books, why can't he do it in our time?

hopefulLandlord:
I would gladly take you up IF you also adhere by these

1. don't argue from ignorance eg "We don't know, therefore god" aka Argumentum ad ignorantum

2. don't argue for a god devoid of claims aka deistic god because most atheists like me feel there's no need arguing against the existence of one and if it does exist, there's no difference in believing it does or it doesn't as it's more of an indifferent god
If this god doesn't intervene in the universe, he is indistinguishable from a God that just doesn't exist in the first place.

agreed! just God's existence, u game?

Blogthug:


agreed! just God's existence, u game?

i am game ....

Blogthug:


agreed! just God's existence, u game?

Which god are you referring to exactly so we can be on the same page

lifecashmoney:
baba no start abeg this sun too hot....


just look my signature

lol, gaining new knowledge ain't a bad idea u know

hahn:


Which god are you referring to exactly so we can be on the same page

capital G, which I will define as Creator of universe and origin of life, any deity that's defined this way fits to be called God, eg Allah, Brahman, Yahweh

johnydon22:
i am game ....

OK Do u believe God exists?

I remember Blogthug.
Who asked if anyone could prove that their mum is not a figment of their imagination, I provided it and he gave one very impish reply.
The guy is a troll. He won't abide by his own rules.

Blogthug:


OK Do u believe God exists?

no i don't

Blogthug:


capital G, which I will define as Creator of universe and origin of life, any deity that's defined this way fits to be called God, eg Allah, Brahman, Yahweh

do you think it makes any difference to spell dog with capital D or small d.. the letter makes no difference here.

Blogthug:


capital G, which I will define as Creator of universe and origin of life, any deity that's defined this way fits to be called God, eg Allah, Brahman, Yahweh

Pick one because you cannot logically conclude, even as a theist, that these three gods are all the supreme being

Blogthug:


lol, gaining new knowledge ain't a bad idea u know

yes... check my signature and let your financial eyes be opened

CatfishBilly:
I remember Blogthug.
Who asked if anyone could prove that their mum is not a figment of their imagination, I provided it and he gave one very impish reply.
The guy is a troll. He won't abide by his own rules.

naa u thought u did but u only ended up presupposing something else that hasn't been proven to not be a figment of your imagination, u are not that intelligent yet, unlike Seun that admitted it was impossible , and he was right , I wonder how he is still an Atheist with all that intelligence smh

Blogthug:


naa u thought u did but u only ended up presupposing something else that hasn't been proven to not be a figment of your imagination, u are not that intelligent yet, unlike Seun that admitted it was impossible , and he was right , I wonder how he is still an Atheist with all that intelligence smh

What proof is more than a DNA test in a parental conflict?
Pray, do tell.

johnydon22:
no i don't

do u believe nothing exists?

hahn:


Pick one because you cannot logically conclude, even as a theist, that these three gods are all the supreme being

it's like a scientist asking another scientist " which nature exists ? " nature is nature and God is God, though no two scientists will describe Nature same way, so as no two religion will describe God same way , get it?

Blogthug:


do u believe nothing exists?

lol i already see where this is going - lets roll with it..

i know the universe exist, i know many things exist - it's not a belief.. so?

CatfishBilly:

What proof is more than a DNA test in a parental conflict?
Pray, do tell.

u are diverting my attention from the purpose of the post, it's called a Red herring

Blogthug:


it's like a scientist asking another scientist " which nature exists ? " nature is nature and God is God, though no two scientists will describe Nature same way, so as no two religion will describe God same way , get it?

there is no two definition of nature that differ or contradict each other in principle or essence so this comparison makes no sense at all.

johnydon22:
lol i already see where this is going - lets roll with it..

i know the universe exist, i know many things exist - it's not a belief.. so?

do u believe it's not a belief?

Blogthug:


do u believe it's not a belief?

jesus. there is a difference between belief and knowledge. something certain and sure cannot be said to be belief a belief while a belief on the other hands bears a stinging mark of uncertainty.

Blogthug:


u are diverting my attention from the purpose of the post, it's called a Red herring

Ooooh.
What happened to the great and intelligent Blogthug?
Can't answer just a simple question?
And you'll be here shouting intelligence up and down.

johnydon22:
there is no two definition of nature that differ or contradict each other in principle or essence so this comparison makes no sense at all.

it makes a lot of sense, remember I specified Capital letter G, the capitalization is important, it denotes a different category of being with ability to create /cause the universe , get it?

Ma sign my presence here. Tosyne2much, this thread go make sense die. Come learn new things OOO.... Kíá kíá

Blogthug:


it makes a lot of sense, remember I specified Capital letter G, the capitalization is important, it denotes a different category of being with ability to create /cause the universe , get it?

it doesn't make any sense what so ever because even using nature for example. using capital N and small n doesn't give the word any special meaning than it already has.

so far you have not brought up any argument just dragging over capital G and small g, i still patiently await your arguments.

johnydon22:
there is no two definition of nature that differ or contradict each other in principle or essence so this comparison makes no sense at all.

strawman, I said Describe , please read properly

Blogthug:


do u believe nothing exists?

What is your definition of "nothing"?

Blogthug:


strawman, I said Describe , please read properly

haaaaaaay Jesus..... there still are no contradicting descriptions of nature either in principle or essence so you still have no case with this.