Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,152,749 members, 7,817,074 topics. Date: Saturday, 04 May 2024 at 03:17 AM

Lai Mohammed: Proscription Of Boko Haram And Ansaru Violates The Constitution - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Lai Mohammed: Proscription Of Boko Haram And Ansaru Violates The Constitution (539 Views)

Nigeria Police Tactical Forces Storm Ansaru Terrorist Camp / Ansaru Planning Renewed Attacks In North-Central Nigeria - Sahara Reporters / Shiites React To Proscription Of Its Activities By FG (2) (3) (4)

(1) (Reply) (Go Down)

Lai Mohammed: Proscription Of Boko Haram And Ansaru Violates The Constitution by Osezua: 7:06pm On Sep 25, 2017
June 10, 2013


The Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) has said that the recent proscription of Boko Haram and Ansaru, desirable as it may be in tackling the terrorist organisations, violates the Constitution.
According to the party, the proscription stifles the press and tampers with the fundamental human rights of Nigerians.

In a statement yesterday by its National Publicity Secretary, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, the ACN said the order also makes it easy for an increasingly intolerant government to clamp down on the opposition, which it sees more as an irritant than an indispensable part of democracy.

It urged professional media organisations to challenge the Order in court to save journalists from long jail terms “simply for carrying out their constitutional duties”.

The ACN urged the Federal Government to clarify “the knotty and vague areas” of the open-ended Order, that may end up punishing journalists and infringing on the civil liberties of the citizens more than it will curtail the activities of the sects.


‘’Against the background of insinuations in government circles, let us be clear that we do not condone the activities of these sects that have killed and maimed innocent Nigerians and turned a section of the country into a battle field. Terrorism in all its ramifications is condemnable, and no responsible government will allow any group, no matter its name, grievances or ideology, to carry out terrorist acts unchecked.

‘’But we believe that whatever action government takes – even in an emergency – must pass the Constitutional test, especially since the relevant sections of the Constitution have not been suspended,’’ the party said.

It said the offensive section of the Order is Section 5 (1), which prescribes a term of imprisonment of not less than 20 years ‘’for any person who knowingly, in any manner, directly or indirectly, solicits or renders support for the commission of an act of terrorism or to a terrorist group’’.

The ACN said “support”, as defined by the Order, includes ‘’incitement to commit a terrorist act through the Internet, or any electronic means or through the use of printed materials or through the dissemination of terrorist information.

‘’Is this subsection not in conflict with Chapter II Section 22 of the Nigeria constitution, which says ‘The press, radio, television and other agencies of the mass media, shall AT ALL TIMES BE FREE (emphasis ours) to uphold the fundamental objectives contained in this chapter and uphold the responsibility and accountability of the government to the people?’

‘’By stifling the press, is the Order not abridging a part of the fundamental human rights guaranteed every citizen under Chapter Four of the Nigerian Constitution in Section 39 (1), which states thus: ‘Every person shall be entitled to freedom of expression, including freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart ideas and information without interference?’(emphasis ours).

‘’Can journalists escape being sentenced to 20-year jail terms for publishing statements issued by the sects? Can they freely report on videos periodically posted on YouTube by Boko Haram leader Shekau? Can the media freely report the kind of massacre that took place in Baga in April without being held liable for ‘supporting’ terrorism? Can radio and television stations organise talk shows on terrorism without the discussants being held liable for ‘supporting’ terrorism?

‘’Can the opposition criticise the government’s strategies against the terrorist sects, through its regular intervention, without being perceived as offering support to the sects? Does this Order cover the satellite broadcast channels that can be accessed in many homes across the country? Who determines when this Order has been breached? These are some of the questions that arise under the proscription Order,’’ the party said.

It said the government must take a cue from what obtains in other countries, especially in the US, which are also battling terrorism, adding that the media in those countries have continued to report freely on the activities of the global terrorist organisation Al-Qaeda, despite the horrendous attacks it has carried out in the US and Europe, among others.

‘’In a statement we issued on May 5th, we said inter alia: ‘The Jonathan Administration is steadily descending into despotism with a brazen assault on the freedom of expression and the press, the use of national institutions against perceived enemies and a growing inclination to denigrate opposition leaders.

‘’The Jonathan Administration is anchored on a Transformation Agenda. But the only transformation that we can see is the one from a democratically-elected

President to an Emperor, a despot…If the President is not prevailed upon to change course, Nigeria may be in for another season of anomie, reminiscent of the days of the maximum ruler who took the country to the brink before his sudden demise.’

‘’We hate to say this has turned out to be prescient, in view of the dangerous provisions of the Boko Haram’s and Ansaru’s proscription Order. The Order’s assault on the press freedom and the Constitutionally-guaranteed rights of ordinary Nigerians is unprecedented in the country’s history. We call on the Federal Government to take a second look at this Order, with a view to resolving any conflict it may have with the Constitution,” the ACN said.

In a reaction to the AC N statement, House of Representatives Minority Leader Femi Gbajabiamila said: “You make a controversial butb an interesting and valid point. The order itself is in order but for the word support which is ambiguous n needs interpretation.”. http://newsrescue.com/lai-mohammed-proscription-boko-haram-ansaru-violates-constitution-rescued/
Re: Lai Mohammed: Proscription Of Boko Haram And Ansaru Violates The Constitution by generalbush(m): 7:07pm On Sep 25, 2017
Lol
Re: Lai Mohammed: Proscription Of Boko Haram And Ansaru Violates The Constitution by RomeSankara: 7:08pm On Sep 25, 2017
Silly Hypocrites ... Sarrki come and see your boss

1 Like

Re: Lai Mohammed: Proscription Of Boko Haram And Ansaru Violates The Constitution by LionDeLeo: 7:08pm On Sep 25, 2017
Ipob is a terrorist organisation.

Parents/guardians, advise your children/wards to steer clear of that terrorist group to avoid stories that touch.

Nothing more, nothing less.
Re: Lai Mohammed: Proscription Of Boko Haram And Ansaru Violates The Constitution by Omeokachie: 8:30pm On Sep 25, 2017
They supported murderous Boko haram yesterday, with their leader nominated as preferred negotiator by boko haram.


Today they are trying a little too hard in portraying a non-existent morality as believing in the sanctity of life.


Nothing they do will paper-over the cracks of their complicity in the festering of the violence that ensued, and attendant loss of lives.

What they did with Boko haram, they are repeating with the herdsmen!

3 Likes

(1) (Reply)

October 1st!!! Independence Or Eviction? / Who Fit President Pass Wike Or Fayose? / Buhari' Writes Paul And Peter: The Unity Of P-square Is Non-negotiable

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 17
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.