Pkjoz:
I give it to einstein. His deserve it becos it is a constant in his formular. But for pythagoras he can use X,Y,&Z

obonujoker:
As for me though, I will give it to Einstein, coz I hate bald headed people...
And the bald headed man, is wearing a kaftan like Buhari, so I feel Einstein will do a better job...

So I give it to Einstein...

Lol.. I m not a science student o...

musicwriter:
Neither of them invented it.

Einstein was influenced by Isaac Newton.

Newton was influenced by Pythagoras.

Pythagoras himself was influenced by Imhotep, the world's first multi-genius who lived here in Africa. Imhotep lived during the reign of pharaoh Djoser (2686 BC - 2649 BC) and he was the one that developed the a2+b2 formula when he was building the step pyramid. The formula was later perfected by Pharaoh Kufour, who used it to build the perfect pyramid at Giza. All this happened over 2,000 years before Pythagoras was born. Indeed, Pythagoras learned mathematics, music, and geometry here in Africa where he came to school.

Your schools would never tell you this in the western controlled indoctrination called education.

Imhotep, the world's first scientist.

donefezy:


Are you saying Pharoah built the pyramid of Giza? If yes how is it possible? Can you help me with links

emmanuelpopson:



gbam...
the imperialist would not agree that blacks once dominate the scientific field.. God bless you for this info..

Solstar:
Unrelated hypothesis, it cant even make it to hypothesis, needless to say it is an issue worth being discussed. In one case Pythagoras is representing values of attributes with alphabeths as an illustration and on the other case, Einstein is using Alphabeths to represent energy phases within the Unified Field.

So then, if the battle is about the superiority of the avatars compared, then we must understand that both men, are not Gods on the same aspects of Science. One is a Mathematician and the other is an Quantum Mechanist so the alphabeths represented different variables.

Who is smarter ? I go for Pythogoras, especially when Einstein made a great blunder on the theory of relativity. That error alone has misled so many scientists, many are not still aware of Einstein error today but look at him as some God, but then, the man tried.

Cosplay:


I believe he regretted what his discoveries came to be used for, and not the scientific discoveries themselves.

Science is neither 'good' nor 'bad'. Science is not morality.

It's like facts. A banana is a fruit. That statement is neither good nor bad, neither positive nor negative.

Special relativity was a modern breakthrough which came to have far reaching applications such as in nuclear fission, in nuclear reactors in power plants.

While it is accurate that special relativity created a relatively new breed of powerful weapons, it also fostered insight into fusion and illumination of the Geophysical characteristics of the earth.

You may have read or heard about vital anti cancer drugs like cyclophosphamide used in Breast Cancer or Multiple Myeloma. That would be considered a 'good' development, I'd bet.

However you may not know that during World War II, Nitrogen Mustard gas was discovered and developed subsequently into blistering chemical agents used till this day with devastating effect in chemical warfare.

Cyclophosphamide is a Nitrogen Mustard.

Would you then consider it 'good' or 'bad?

Pepper spray is a powerful personal protection tool.

But did you know that the primary inventor has severally mentioned his regret that it is often used by draconian regimes to curb public protests?

Does that then make Pepper Spray good or bad?

Science is an Objective process. The applications of that scientific process is where morality lies therein.

blingxx:


u talk of warfare as its a good thing.... the theory of relativity was also used when creating the atomic bomb that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki even einstien himself regretted some of his achievements

obonujoker:
Who actually deserves this more??

Einstein or Pythagoras... Science students should know better, and why is the one deserving of it??

Mynd44
Laslaticlala
FTC...

oglalasioux:
C2 is not same in both mathematical expressions. For pythagoras it's a proof of expression of shapes while for Einstein's equation C stands for speed or celeritas in Latin.

pressplay411:


Einstein regretted his letter. But Robert Oppenheimer was the physicist whose team would forever change warfare and now the safety and existence of humanity hangs on a thread.

israelmao:
Scientific invention or discovery is always a progressive modification.If one had not created the basis the other one would not have had an inkling of where to go.In creativity brilliance is borrowed for incremental process.Therefore, if Pythgoras theorem had not existed C square that represents speed of light in the equation would not have been discovered and E and M which represent energy and mass respectively would have been useless.There is no doubt that Albert Einstein's discovery as regards to E=MC^2 which is called theory of relativity,brought great change in our world but one thing led to another.

PVision2020:
100% Pythagoras. There is simply no basis for comparison. When Pythagoras was postulating the theorem for the Area of a right angle triangle (A^2+B^2 = C^2) Einstein was still in the bowel of his ancestors.
It was the finished works of Pythagoras and the other early days mathematicians/philosophers that Einstein and his mate relied on to make their famous discoveries.

In conclusion Pythagoras brought something out of nothing while Einstein stood on the shoulders of the elders (Pythagoras and co) to make exploit

FulaniTerrorist:




Arabs not Blacks
Africa is not only about Blacks that's why the West use the term Sub-Sahara

AkpaMgbor:

Color me cynical, but I think einstein was overhyped..Pythagoras was a greater mathematical genius and as far as geniuses go, Einstein pales in comparison to people like Thomas Edison and Leonardo Da Vinci to mention a few.