FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS ON THE DISTORTED 2018 BUDGET – PRESIDENCY
Sequel to the response of the National Assembly justifying its distortion of the 2018 Budget, the following clarifications have become necessary.
1. Throughout the budget consideration process the executive, through the Ministry of Budget and National Planning, was in touch with the National Assembly. The executive was approached by the National Assembly who indicated that they intended to increase the benchmark price by US$5, from US$45 to US$50. Out of the US$5 increase the National Assembly informed the Executive that they intended to utilize US$2 (amounting to about N170 billion) for projects selected by themselves. They asked the Executive to suggest important projects that could be accommodated with the funds arising from the balance of US$3.
2. After some consideration, the Executive was of the view that an increase in the benchmark price of crude oil to US$50 was not unrealistic and the President decided to accept this in the spirit of compromise required for a successful budget exercise. The Executive had, in that spirit, suggested that from the additional funds arising out of the US$3 increase, $1.25 from the increase should not be appropriated as expenditure, but utilized to reduce the deficit in the budget. The Executive therefore restricted itself to submitting, for the consideration of the National Assembly, important items that could be funded from US$1.75 of the US$3 increase. NASS eventually raised the benchmark price to US$51, apparently to accommodate the additional allocations to Health and NDDC.
3. The Executive is therefore surprised that with an additional sum of N170 billion Naira available for the National Assembly to spend on Constituency Projects, together with the sum of N100 billion Naira, already provided for in the Budget, that the National Assembly should feel it necessary to cut allocations to important national projects, and thereby distort the Budget, in order to further increase their allocation for Constituency projects. How much is enough!
4. The President’s position is clear from paragraph 12k of the President’s speech, where he said “About 70 new road projects have been inserted into the budget of the Federal Ministry of Power, Works and Housing. In doing so, the National Assembly applied some of the additional funds expected from the upward review of the oil price benchmark to the Ministry’s vote. Regrettably, however, in order to make provision for some of the new roads, the amounts allocated to some strategic major roads have been cut by the National Assembly”.
FEMI ADESINA
Special Adviser to the President
(Media & Publicity)
June 22, 2018

https://mobile.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1742135542545445&id=100002470489894&_rdc=1&_rdr

I like this

Believe the national assembly version at ur own peril.

I honestly share the same thinking with Osquare, we need a president that is ready to test the limit of the law on this issue, if not, we are just going to keep moving in circle

After 2019 I'm sure Baba will put an end to this

1. NASS is an organ of govt and as important as the executive (or at least should hv been).

2. NASS is the only organ dt is currently ensuring dt PMB does not become complete autocrat.

3. NASS is thief and constituency project allocation is a scam.

4. D executive should never act as though she can control the legislature. In fact, it should be the other way round.