Metuh:
Saraki this, Saraki that.


APC nightmares

paxonel:
How this saraki dey stop this apc from working sef?

They keep looking for people to blame for their failures. The other time na Jonathan, today na saraki.

Nigeria which way?

uboma:
Is this not the same Femi Gbajabiamila who purchased a car worth NGN75 million for his wife sometime this year?


https://www.lindaikejisblog.com/2018/5/house-of-reps-majority-leader-femi-gbajabiamila-buys-wife-n75m-g-wagon-with-a-customized-assurance-licence-plates-for-her-50th-birthday.html

Don't mind the mumu people just playing us



https://www.vanguardngr.com/2018/05/reps-leader-gbajabiamila-fire-buying-wife-n75m-mercedes-g-wagon/


APC is full of hypocrites.

Neatnewz:
The leader of the House of Representatives and chairman of the APC Caucus, Femi Gbajabiamila, has explained why Bukola Saraki must step down as the Senate President.

In an interview with Premium Times, Gbajabiamila said that though he was family friend with Saraki, this was based on the “letter of the law”.

According to the lawmaker who cited the US Congress as an example, it was not about impeachment, but Saraki’s eligibility for the office he occupies.

“The Senate President is a family friend I grew up with and did not know or meet in politics. That’s why this has been particularly difficult for me and I wish the situation was not what it is now.

I believe beyond the 2/3rds debate, a constitution or law is interpreted based on the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. If a provision is ambiguous as it apparently is now you look at the intention of the drafters and framers if the constitution.

“So the question is – could it have been the intention of the framers that a minority or opposition member would be a senate president? The answer is clearly no. Any other interpretation will lead to absurdity.

If we say yes the law did not mind a situation where such would happen then it means an opposition senate president can use his position to make sure the ruling party/government fails.

It would be in his interest to do so, so as to give his opposition party the opportunity to take over the government. This could never have been the intention.

“If I were the Senate president and I belonged to the opposition I would........[263 more words) http://www.hintnewz.com/2018/08/why-saraki-must-quit-as-senate.html

Esseite:
Stories... if its not 2/3, forget it.

Enice:
2/3 of 109 or 2/3 of quorum. If you say the former, then the idea of the constitution has been defeated cause at present we do not have a complete senate.

magoo10:

According to the lawmaker who cited the US Congress as an example, it was not about impeachment, but Saraki’s eligibility for the office he occupies.

Hypocrites always citing USA as example when they want to fool themselves.

Can the president of united states be absent from office for 3months on health grounds without disclosing the nature of his ailment ,or can the president of america disregard valid court judgements severally. No

Saraki controls the senate ,APC should suck it up