*Read the executive summary of the FBI’s supplemental investigation into Kavanaugh allegations*

*Supplemental FBI Investigation Executive Summary*

*Background*

At the Senate Judiciary Committee’s request, the FBI opened a supplemental background investigation into Judge Kavanaugh. It’s his seventh FBI background investigation in 25 years, going back to 1993. The request was for an investigation into current credible allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.

In the course of its investigation, the FBI decided to reach out to eleven people, ten of whom agreed to be interviewed. The FBI reached out to all witnesses with potential firsthand knowledge of the allegations. The FBI provided to the Senate 12 detailed FD-302 reports summarizing their interviews with the witnesses as well as supporting materials cited by the witnesses during their interviews.

*Interview Subjects*

The FBI interviewed the following ten individuals:

*Ford Allegations*

The three individuals identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as having attended the gathering where she was allegedly assaulted. Mark Judge PJ Smyth Leland Keyser

Mark Judge

PJ Smyth

Leland Keyser

Two other individuals included on Judge Kavanaugh’s July 1, 1982 calendar entry. Timothy Gaudette Christopher Garrett

Timothy Gaudette

Christopher Garrett

An attorney for one of the witnesses

*Ramirez Allegations*

Deborah Ramirez
Two alleged eyewitnesses named by Deborah Ramirez (a third alleged eyewitness refused to submit to an interview)
Deborah Ramirez’s close friend from college

*Conclusion*

The Supplemental Background Investigation confirms what the Senate Judiciary Committee concluded after its investigation: there is no corroboration of the allegations made by Dr. Ford or Ms. Ramirez.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/read-the-executive-summary-of-the-fbis-supplemental-investigation-into-kavanaugh-allegations

The way the guy responded aggressively to questions by senate committee really makes me wonder if he has manners, or trying to intimidate those who were supposed to approve him.


One thing is that guilty persons are always the loudest and most aggressive with their attempt to end investigation

zlantanfan:
The way the guy responded aggressively to questions by senate committee really makes me wonder if he has manners, or trying to intimidate those who were supposed to approve him.


One thing is that guilty persons are always the loudest and most aggressive with their attempt to end investigation

He was only being rude to some Democrats who earlier called him "evil" and disaster. They made it too political, according to the guy.

I listened to the whole interview and he was only trying to defend himself.

BTW, how can somebody wake at the point of your promotion and say you molested her 36 years ago.

Let them park well.

zlantanfan:
The way the guy responded aggressively to questions by senate committee really makes me wonder if he has manners, or trying to intimidate those who were supposed to approve him.


One thing is that guilty persons are always the loudest and most aggressive with their attempt to end investigation

So he is supposed to sit there and take all their crap right?

VISTIN:


He was only being rude to some Democrats who earlier called him "evil" and disaster. They made it too political, according to the guy.

I listened to the whole interview and he was only trying to defend himself.

BTW, how can somebody wake at the point of your promotion and say you molested her 36 years ago.

Let them park well.

OK, but their is no smoke without fire, someone said a nominee for such position is not even suppose to have any uncertainty baggage.

But from his response he tried to make it a democrat witchhunt to get Republican solidarity.

I feel the guy would have political undertone in his dealings as supreme court judge, trump mocking of ford isn't even helping issues