atiku4President:
His view is not law

kahal29:
In a Supreme Court judgement delivered by justice Onnoghen in the case of Saraki vs CCB he held the view that a federal high Court cannot stop the sitting of the tribunal..... In his words while resolving Issue No he said and I quote verbatim....


I hold the view that the instant issue is an attempt at intimidating the Code of Conduct Tribunal, which is very unfortunate.


Law is good.....


https://nigerialii.org/ng/judgment/supreme-court/2016/53

kahal29:


His view is law because it is a Supreme Court judgement

kahal29:
In a Supreme Court judgement delivered by justice Onnoghen in the case of Saraki vs CCB he held the view that a federal high Court cannot stop the sitting of the tribunal..... In his words while resolving Issue No he said and I quote verbatim....


I hold the view that the instant issue is an attempt at intimidating the Code of Conduct Tribunal, which is very unfortunate.


Law is good.....


https://nigerialii.org/ng/judgment/supreme-court/2016/53

kahal29:
In a Supreme Court judgement delivered by justice Onnoghen in the case of Saraki vs CCB he held the view that a federal high Court cannot stop the sitting of the tribunal..... In his words while resolving Issue No he said and I quote verbatim....


I hold the view that the instant issue is an attempt at intimidating the Code of Conduct Tribunal, which is very unfortunate.


Law is good.....


https://nigerialii.org/ng/judgment/supreme-court/2016/53

omonaijiria:


Is Saraki a judicial officers


Ore mi your OP holds no water

atiku4President:
His view is not law

ImperialYoruba:


Who said this, ....a Nigerian?

One day this guy will be looking for vote to be a lawmaker in this country.

Do you know what a Judge does? Interprete the law.


Anyway, this is a precedence.

nonsobaba:
Oh this is lovely. It means the CCT can totally disregard the useless FHC judgement and go about its business of docking the chief justice to answer for his crimes.

omonaijiria:
If you have anything against CJN the Nigeria constitution makes it clear.

From. Whoever to CCB, to CJN, To President, to senate

In this case was it followed.

So this case is different

Sirjamo:
So, if Onnoghen commit murder now, the executive will first take permission from njc to prosecute him despite he's the chairman of njc?

nonsobaba:
Oh this is lovely. It means the CCT can totally disregard the useless FHC judgement and go about its business of docking the chief justice to answer for his crimes.

Sirjamo:
So, if Onnoghen commit murder now, the executive will first take permission from njc to prosecute him despite he's the chairman of njc?

JusticeSeeker:
I've realized that many of these e-warriors on Nairaland are illiterates. How can a court of coordinate jurisdiction stop another from executing it's function. Strange to law.

PaChukwudi44:


The CJN will never show up before the CCT.Suck on it

baralatie:
This is an except from the judgement delivered by the supreme court in the case of saraki vs cct
.Note the bolded


I have carefully gone through the record particularly the order of the Federal High Court in suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/775/2015 issued on the 17th day of September, 2015 and reproduced at pages 946 - 949 of Vol. 2 of the record and the judgment of the lower court on the issue particularly at pages 1243 - 1244 of the record and I have no hesitation in agreeing with
the decision of the lower court on the matter. The lower court found/held as follows, inter alia-
"It is apparent on the face of the record of appeal that the tribunal was misled into believing or thinking that the Federal High Court made an order "barring" it from sitting. There was[b] no such order.[/b] The order of the Federal High Court reproduced above, merely directed the main respondents "to appear before this court ………… And show cause why the interim orders of injunction being sought by the plaintiff/appellant should not be made ……… " The respondent to the Appellant ex-parte application could "appear" before the Federal High Court either by themselves or by their legal practitioners* to react to the appellant's motion on notice for interim injunction. The order of the Federal High Court did not ask the Tribunal to stay proceedings or further proceedings in the case, the subject matter of this appeal Since there was[b] no order by the Federal High Court directing the tribunal to stay proceedings, the argument of the contending parties on whether or not the tribunal is a superior court having coordinate jurisdiction with the Federal High Court are merely of academic relevance." [/b]

the present ruling by the Fhc abuja BARRED the cct from hearing the matter
which means that the cct cannot rely on the saraki vs cct case as a precedence.