Good

nepapole:
yes....they should be compennsated. Such tragedies result fromm government's inability to pperform their duties properly.

It is not in the Government's place to pay compensation when a PRIVATE building collapses..

They should go and meet their Insurance company..

Or hold the Owner..

When I go through most of the comments on NL
Its clear people don't know how this works
The system is corrupt
Buy a land
Erect just a few blocks to window level
U will see the red sign for demolition
All they need is for u to come to the office
Pay some money and u can continue
No one comes to look at what u are building
After many years the building collapses
They will bring out your file and say the building was marked for demolition
They know how to beat us in our own game

tiredoflife:
When I go through most of the comments on NL
Its clear people don't know how this works
The system is corrupt
Buy a land
Erect just a few blocks to window level
U will see the red sign for demolition
All they need is for u to come to the office
Pay some money and u can continue
No one comes to look at what u are building
After many years the building collapses
They will bring out your file and say the building was marked for demolition
They know how to beat us in our own game

Your moniker get as e be o

Tundexxy:


Your moniker get as e be o

Face the message
U dey fear death

Inabilities government shame

tiredoflife:

Face the message U dey fear death

I no fear at all bro
Na wetin i dey pray for be that....lol

Now Ipob tax payers money will be used to compensate afonjas for refusing to do the right thing.

OboOlora:
With whose money, tax payers money?
We need to get off this sentimental behavior of ours in this country.
The govt should fish out whoever removed that demolition mark!

Great point

its actually a court case between the injured and the owner of the (private) building- the burden of safety lies with him. it should be somewhere in the contract the tenants signed

i dont get it- is it the government who should pay a fine for not demolishing on time (which is an offence)

in which case the government has to get the exact department, worker and their superior who were assigned to monitor that building

or was the owner supposed to demolish it?

Makes no sense. If the building was marked for demolition... it means the owner disregarded the order and had the building occupied. He should be facing X (number of dead)charges for manslaughter. The head person in charge of enforcing the regulations and the one responsible for ensuring the building was unoccupied..... the one who is responsible for having all private schools inspected and registered and are in compliance .... they all need to be fired and face some kind of charge for negligence of duty. As long as there is no accountability nor consequences.... it will be a free for all.

Pavore9:


Where was it mentioned in the article that the FG should pay compensation in those 2 states?

I tire o. no mind that thing.