lonelydora:
Rape is 100% wrong. But if the guy is remorseful and wants to marry rhe girl and she agrees, then no issues.

Any man who goes after my daughter against her wish will meet his creator immediately. I no dey for all these police or court case.


Meanwhile,

16 years old girl is on her mid-level olosho-ism career in Port Harcourt and Owerri.


You will be calling her small girl and she will teach oyou what you don't know in bedmatics.

BlackManta:
Daddy Freeze is right.

A man trying to to marry a girl he raped is supported by the Bible.
It is written in the Bible.


Deuteronomy 22:28-29 which reads:

If a man encounters a young woman, a virgin who is not engaged, takes hold of her and rapes her, and they are discovered, the man who raped her must give the young woman’s father 50 silver shekels, and she must become his wife because he violated her. He cannot divorce her as long as he lives.

People will argue that it is an Old Testament commandment bla bla bla..

But why do Christians shun this particular Old Testament commandment that supports a rapist marrying his victim but applaud and encourage tithes and first fruits which is also an Old Testament commandment

Christians only cherry pick the commandments in Old Testament that suits the appetite of their pastors.

If Old Testament is outdated and law of Moses is no longer valid in Christianity, then pastors must stop collecting tithes and first fruits as well

therealakuko:




Tithing is supported by Jesus Christ himself. Refer to Matt 23: 23 of the Bible. There is no cherry picking here.

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.

in other words... Jesus was telling the Pharisees and scribes that while they ought to pay their tithe, (which isn't just limited to their income alone but to other possessions of theirs even those as insignificant as spices such as mint and cummin) they also ought to take into consideration more important matters of Law such as judgement, mercy and faith... In other words, there is no cherry picking. You ought not to leave one undone at the expense of the other. You ought to do both. GRACIAS...

lonelydora:
Rape is 100% wrong. But if the guy is remorseful and wants to marry rhe girl and she agrees, then no issues.

Any man who goes after my daughter against her wish will meet his creator immediately. I no dey for all these police or court case.


Meanwhile,

16 years old girl is on her mid-level olosho-ism career in Port Harcourt and Owerri.


You will be calling her small girl and she will teach you what you don't know in bedmatics.

VULCAN:
This is why they say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

Since you are not a Christian, don't you think you should take the time to study the Bible instead of making ignorant comments about things that are not your forte?

There is a very big difference BTW The Law of Moses and The Old Testament. You have lumped them together and made a hot mess.

Your homework is to go find out what that difference is?

Submit within 24 hrs

Lanretoye:
rape is not a spiritual offence in nigeria.

PopeFlatino:
Finally FTC ...under 6months of officially been an active member, although I have been into comment reading for 10 years now

Friends wish me well..I have a TOEFL exam to take tomorrow pls

therealakuko:




Tithing is supported by Jesus Christ himself. Refer to Matt 23: 23 of the Bible. There is no cherry picking here.

Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.

in other words... Jesus was telling the Pharisees and scribes that while they ought to pay their tithe, (which isn't just limited to their income alone but to other possessions of theirs even those as insignificant as spices such as mint and cummin) they also ought to take into consideration more important matters of Law such as judgement, mercy and faith... In other words, there is no cherry picking. You ought not to leave one undone at the expense of the other. You ought to do both. GRACIAS...

lonelydora:


16 years old girl is on her mid-level olosho-ism career in Port Harcourt and Owerri.


You will be calling her small girl and she will teach you what you don't know in bedmatics.

BlackManta:
Daddy Freeze is right.

A man trying to to marry a girl he raped is supported by the Bible.
It is written in the Bible.


Deuteronomy 22:28-29 which reads:

If a man encounters a young woman, a virgin who is not engaged, takes hold of her and rapes her, and they are discovered, the man who raped her must give the young woman’s father 50 silver shekels, and she must become his wife because he violated her. He cannot divorce her as long as he lives.

People will argue that it is an Old Testament commandment bla bla bla..

But why do Christians shun this particular Old Testament commandment that supports a rapist marrying his victim but applaud and encourage tithes and first fruits which is also an Old Testament commandment

Christians only cherry pick the commandments in Old Testament that suits the appetite of their pastors.

If Old Testament is outdated and law of Moses is no longer valid in Christianity, then pastors must stop collecting tithes and first fruits as well

davidodiba:



Read. You won't. Try and understand, never...you rather a path leading to your dead end...
The next time you call my daughter again, your clam head will behave a spiritual bleeding until you beg for help...Try it again...just try it again
You and Freeze are same cold blooded antichrist and your end is coming ...

kabukabu50:


Absolutely stupid.
Why would you encourage a marriage between a victim who was been violently abused to the perpetrator of the crime against her��.
Makes no sense.
The rapist should be prosecuted and remanded to the law and victim should get counseling and some form of restitution from the sick monkey man who couldn't control himself.

davidodiba:
Okay. Good for him. He is gradually trying hard to align properly. Not cursing men who have made their names through suffering...
If the girl agrees, he should go ahead and do the right thing

genkins:

Are you a Pharisee,my brother?are you under the law?did Jesus in mat 23:23 refer to Christians?guy,use your brain read in context don't follow what your unintelligent pastors say.smh

phemocheee:
English is just too hard for some people....Daddy freeze is definitely not in support of this man. Based on old testament, especially in the book of Deuteronomy, the rapist would have been justified to marry the girl. However, this is now totally unacceptable since we are no longer under the law.

What freeze is trying to say here is that we are no longer bound by the law. Hence, doctrines around tithing, first fruit, clothing e.t.c specifically stated in the old testament, should be discarded while we accept the teachings of Jesus as well as the disciples.

If you really want to practise the doctrines under the law, practise everything from A to Z. Stop picking the ones that favour you and neglecting the others. That's hypocritical

Wetin I know sef.

alBHAGDADI:


Lalasticlala

Isn't this a perfect rebuttal to the thread below which is currently on front page?


https://www.nairaland.com/5130182/daddy-freeze-supports-man-raped

PopeFlatino:
Finally FTC ...under 6months of officially been an active member, although I have been into comment reading for 10 years now

Friends wish me well..I have a TOEFL exam to take tomorrow pls

phemocheee:
English is just too hard for some people....Daddy freeze is definitely not in support of this man. Based on old testament, especially in the book of Deuteronomy, the rapist would have been justified to marry the girl. However, this is now totally unacceptable since we are no longer under the law.

What freeze is trying to say here is that we are no longer bound by the law. Hence, doctrines around tithing, first fruit, clothing e.t.c specifically stated in the old testament, should be discarded while we accept the teachings of Jesus as well as the disciples.

If you really want to practise the doctrines under the law, practise everything from A to Z. Stop picking the ones that favour you and neglecting the others. That's hypocritical

Wetin I know sef.

budaatum:

Rebuttal, me ass! Your view is crap. It is not a suitable view for frontpage to hold!

You here should come educate him in fact!!

BlackManta:
Daddy Freeze is right.

A man trying to to marry a girl he raped is supported by the Bible.
It is written in the Bible.


Deuteronomy 22:28-29 which reads:

If a man encounters a young woman, a virgin who is not engaged, takes hold of her and rapes her, and they are discovered, the man who raped her must give the young woman’s father 50 silver shekels, and she must become his wife because he violated her. He cannot divorce her as long as he lives.

People will argue that it is an Old Testament commandment bla bla bla..

But why do Christians shun this particular Old Testament commandment that supports a rapist marrying his victim but applaud and encourage tithes and first fruits which is also an Old Testament commandment

Christians only cherry pick the commandments in Old Testament that suits the appetite of their pastors.

If Old Testament is outdated and law of Moses is no longer valid in Christianity, then pastors must stop collecting tithes and first fruits as well

PopeFlatino:
Finally FTC ...under 6months of officially been an active member, although I have been into comment reading for 10 years now

Friends wish me well..I have a TOEFL exam to take tomorrow pls

PopeFlatino:
Finally FTC ...under 6months of officially been an active member, although I have been into comment reading for 10 years now

Friends wish me well..I have a TOEFL exam to take tomorrow pls

BlackManta:
Daddy Freeze is right.

A man trying to to marry a girl he raped is supported by the Bible.
It is written in the Bible.


Deuteronomy 22:28-29 which reads:

If a man encounters a young woman, a virgin who is not engaged, takes hold of her and rapes her, and they are discovered, the man who raped her must give the young woman’s father 50 silver shekels, and she must become his wife because he violated her. He cannot divorce her as long as he lives.

People will argue that it is an Old Testament commandment bla bla bla..

But why do Christians shun this particular Old Testament commandment that supports a rapist marrying his victim but applaud and encourage tithes and first fruits which is also an Old Testament commandment

Christians only cherry pick the commandments in Old Testament that suits the appetite of their pastors.

If Old Testament is outdated and law of Moses is no longer valid in Christianity, then pastors must stop collecting tithes and first fruits as well