MXrep:

The pilot study is admissible as evidence

See the pilot study here

https://www.nairaland.com/5158257/why-enugu-state-people-considered

socialmediaman:


The law stipulates that INEC must publicly announce the final results, right? Did the law specify that INEC must announce the results on national TV using a microphone? Does it mean that if they choose to announce the results on national TV, the video and audio evidence will not be admissible in court?

What you don't know you ask. Check no 4 there

Emedu:

What you don't know you ask. Check no 4 there

absolutely right

Jesusloveyou:
hahahahahahahahahaha,
you are too funny.

show us the video where inec chairman said result will be transmitted through card reader.
and how all the 120,000 poling unit card reader were able to function properly and transmitted result successfully.

Suit yourself mister.
https://www.nairaland.com/4335961/inec-transmit-2019-elections-results#64880550



https://www.dailytrust.com.ng/inec-to-transmit-2019-elections-results-through-satellite.html


Now you've shifted it to how all 120,000 units where able to transmit results , if you're not blinded be sentiment,I believe you must have read here on nairaland where some INEC staff that conducted the election had to sleep over till Sunday in other for them to transmit the results.

Emedu:


Your problem is that you don't study enough.
According to our law there Must be oral announcement of the results according to what was written on EC A4 form.

Ive seen this a lot where people jumped on one’s question when they didn’t understand it. You didn’t seem to understand my question so I’ll rephrase. I didn’t see where the law said INEC must announce the result using “NATIONAL TELEVISION”. Does it mean the election result is not valid if INEC used national TV to announce it?

Without Using Television?? or U mean without been broadcast?
Incoherent comparison!

socialmediaman:


Ive seen this a lot where people jumped on one’s question when didn’t understand it. You didn’t seem to understand my question so I’ll rephrase. I didn’t see where the law said INEC must announce the result using “NATIONAL TELEVISION”. Does it mean the election result is not valid if INEC used national TV to announce it?

Funny You to make such a poor comparison. Don't say judges has compromised when they released their judgement o

Emedu:


What you don't know you ask. Check no 4 there

And when the votes becomes ijebu garri which rises at inec office, then the electronically transmitted results will be consulted to verify

Emedu:


Funny You to make sure a poor comparison. Don't say judges has compromised when they released their judgement o

The only thing that gives buhari supporters confidence is buhari's tyrannical approach.

udemzyudex:


Suit yourself mister.
https://www.nairaland.com/4335961/inec-transmit-2019-elections-results#64880550



https://www.dailytrust.com.ng/inec-to-transmit-2019-elections-results-through-satellite.html


Now you've shifted it to how all 120,000 units where able to transmit results , if you're not blinded be sentiment,I believe you must have read here on nairaland where some INEC staff that conducted the election had to sleep over till Sunday in other for them to transmit the results.

if some were able to transmit fictitious number to unknown server,
will that be admissible in court since all the card reader can not function and thief atiku got all the result in inec server,
but the manual in my poling unit indicate how pcp got 20 vote, and in thief atiku server, pcp got zero vote in 120,000 poling unit.
how is that possible?.
does that mean thief atiku add all the other candidate scores to his own.
pls tell us the technology that divert all other candidate scores to pdp.
that is how the po’s err in their e-collation.

Jesusloveyou:
if some were able to transmit fictitious number to unknown server,
will that be admissible in court since all the card reader can not function and thief atiku got all the result in inec server,
but the manual in my poling unit indicate how pcp got 20 vote, and in thief atiku server, pcp got zero vote in 120,000 poling unit.
how is that possible?.
does that mean thief atiku add all the other candidate scores to his own.
pls tell us the technology that divert all other candidate scores to pdp.
that is how the po’s err in their e-collation.

Oga you have nothing reasonable to say again jare.

You're talking about transferring fictitious number,but you accept the manual results as the real one right?
The transmitted ones is the wrong one right?

You're deluded oga

udemzyudex:


Oga you have nothing reasonable to say again jare.

You're talking about transferring fictitious number,but you accept the manual results as the real one right?
The transmitted ones is the wrong one right?

You're deluded oga

Actually,its true.the manual is the best,it has legal backing and overrides every other result.why didnt the presiding officers transmit the results to the collation centers electronically

MXrep:

And when the votes becomes ijebu garri which rises at inec office, then the electronically transmitted results will be consulted to verify

it is easy to rise in inec server than to rise manually,
results are be followed from poling unit to ward collation center, from there to LGA collation, from there to State collation center, to abuja collation center,
but, ward collation center can not get the result of poling unit from inec server,
and LGA collation center can not transmit result to State collation center through inec server.

garfield1:

Actually,its true.the manual is the best,it has legal backing and overrides every other result.why didnt the presiding officers transmit the results to the collation centers electronically

You're talking out of point as usual,go through the link I posted above,did the chairman say anything about transmitting to the collation centres or INEC server?

When we started using manual,there was nothing like card reader , everything was done manually including accreditation.
When card reader was introduced some people kicked against it but the law as ammended gave INEC the power to determine how election would be conducted.

Card reader was use for accreditation alone but this year INEC decide to use it for both accreditation and transmitting of result.

Now,if all presiding officers who conducted the election agreed that results were transmitted,this is on polling unit ,while manual will be done after taking it to collation centres Which can be several miles away from the polling unit, which one do you think will be easily tampered with?

If manual is backed by law is card reader accreditation back by law?

Emedu:


Funny You to make sure a poor comparison. Don't say judges has compromised when they released their judgement o

You characterized the analogy but couldn’t answer the question?

udemzyudex:


Oga you have nothing reasonable to say again jare.

You're talking about transferring fictitious number,but you accept the manual results as the real one right?
The transmitted ones is the wrong one right?

You're deluded oga

are you afraid to answer the simple question.
why other candidates score zeros in thief atiku server,
but they all score votes across all the 120,000 poling unit.

Jesusloveyou:
are you afraid to answer the simple question.
why other candidates score zeros in thief atiku server,
but they all score votes across all the 120,000 poling unit.

Oga I don't answer stup1d questions, first you talk about how possible it is to transmit results from all the polling units,now you shift your point to other party scoring zero . Oga Meet Atiku at the tribunal.

udemzyudex:


You're talking out of point as usual,go through the link I posted above,did the chairman say anything about transmitting to the collation centres or INEC server?

When we started using manual,there was nothing like card reader , everything was done manually including accreditation.
When card reader was introduced some people kicked against it but the law as ammended gave INEC the power to determine how election would be conducted.

Card reader was use for accreditation alone but this year INEC decide to use it for both accreditation and transmitting of result.

Now,if all presiding officers who conducted the election agreed that results were transmitted,this is on polling unit ,while manual will be done after taking it to collation centres Which can be several miles away from the polling unit, which one do you think will be easily tampered with?

If manual is backed by law is card reader accreditation back by law?

hahahahahahahahahaha,
you are too funny,
so thief atiku got all the poling unit result transmitted to inec server even when all the card reader could not function,
thief atiku has implicated himself,
even in his own allegation that SE votes were suppress, meaning many could not vote due to card reader not functioning,
how come thief atiku was able to get the result even as the card reader could not transmit result to inec server.
he even award 1.5m votes for buhari in SE and gave their son moghalu, zero vote in SE.
very wicked.

udemzyudex:


Oga I don't answer stup1d questions, first you talk about how possible it is to transmit results from all the polling units,now you shift your point to other party scoring zero . Oga Meet Atiku at the tribunal.

hahahahahahahahahaha,
how can thief atiku answer that at the tribunal,
because the case has already be struck out,
and thief atiku must go jail for tempering with inec server by imputing his own fictitious figures.
idiotic pigs will soon Start to cry for thief atiku alcameroon

Jesusloveyou:
hahahahahahahahahaha,
how can thief atiku answer that at the tribunal,
because the case has already be struck out,
and thief atiku must go jail for tempering with inec server by imputing his own fictitious figures.
idiotic pigs will soon Start to cry for thief atiku alcameroon

Are you part of the judges? keep deceiving yourself

Mahmood Yakubu is a pure thief and liar

God will purnish him

udemzyudex:


You're talking out of point as usual,go through the link I posted above,did the chairman say anything about transmitting to the collation centres or INEC server?

When we started using manual,there was nothing like card reader , everything was done manually including accreditation.
When card reader was introduced some people kicked against it but the law as ammended gave INEC the power to determine how election would be conducted.

Card reader was use for accreditation alone but this year INEC decide to use it for both accreditation and transmitting of result.

Now,if all presiding officers who conducted the election agreed that results were transmitted,this is on polling unit ,while manual will be done after taking it to collation centres Which can be several miles away from the polling unit, which one do you think will be easily tampered with?

If manual is backed by law is card reader accreditation back by law?

One,not all polling units used card readers nor trsnsmitted results electronically to inec server.
Two,while the electoral act gives inec power to use card reader or any other means,the constitution clearly recognizes the manual system thereby making it superior to any other system inec may decide to bring.
All transmissions are supposed to go through the collation centers and be declared publicly there.how can you just send polling unit results sheets to abuja without it passing through ward,lg and state levels collation? This has invalidated it.
Mind you all manual result sheets of polling units are done at the units while electronic transmission were mostly done outside rendering it prone to manipulations.

Finally since you and atiku have problems with collated results,the solution is polling unit result sheets.let him gather all of it and re collate the results and stop wasting our time.

garfield1:

One,not all polling units used card readers nor trsnsmitted results electronically to inec server.
Two,while the electoral act gives inec power to use card reader or any other means,the constitution clearly recognizes the manual system thereby making it superior to any other system inec may decide to bring.
All transmissions are supposed to go through the collation centers and be declared publicly there.how can you just send polling unit results sheets to abuja without it passing through ward,lg and state levels collation? This has invalidated it.
Mind you all manual result sheets of polling units are done at the units while electronic transmission were mostly done outside rendering it prone to manipulations.

Finally since you and atiku have problems with collated results,the solution is polling unit result sheets.let him gather all of it and re collate the results and stop wasting our time.

Not all polling unit used card reader if that's the case then there was no election in that polling unit because INEC chairman made it compulsory with the card reader.

Oga stop talking about the constitution clearly recognizing the manual system ,just take this nonsense point out of whatever you're saying here because the same constitution doesn't recognise accreditation with card reader but it was used in 2015 and 2019.

You're talking about transmission going through coalition centres,my question for you is that did INEC tell the presiding officer to transmit to coalition centre s? Is there any arrangement like servers at the coalition centres that will collect all the transmitted results from all polling unit in the state?

Mind you all manual results sheet will have to b taken to the coalition centre making it prone to manipulation too.

Lastly, I have told you to join either INEC or APC legal team to defend their fraud at the tribunal.

udemzyudex:


Not all polling unit used card reader if that's the case then there was no election in that polling unit because INEC chairman made it compulsory with the card reader.

Oga stop talking about the constitution clearly recognizing the manual system ,just take this nonsense point out of whatever you're saying here because the same constitution doesn't recognise accreditation with card reader but it was used in 2015 and 2019.

You're talking about transmission going through coalition centres,my question for you is that did INEC tell the presiding officer to transmit to coalition centre s? Is there any arrangement like servers at the coalition centres that will collect all the transmitted results from all polling unit in the state?

Mind you all manual results sheet will have to b taken to the coalition centre making it prone to manipulation too.

Lastly, I have told you to join either INEC or APC legal team to defend their fraud at the tribunal.

We are getting somewhere gradually.i cant take the constitution out of any argument.all points in thid case must be clearly supported by the constitution which is superior to any sentiments or inec guidelines.
That inec gave an order or followed a process does not make it legal as far as its not in the constitution.non use of card readers cannot invalidate an election.cancellation of elections in polling units that didnt use card readers will affect both parties equally.
You said manual results are prone to manipulations once taken to the collation centres.yes but each party has copies which cant be manipulated plus any alterations illegally done on the original will nullify it.on the other hand,electronic results have no copy or witnesses and doesn't undergo stringent processes like the manual.
Pdp agents all have copies,let them calculate and get the real figures

udemzyudex:
The INEC chairman is just coming up with this nonsense to save face,

That interview was from January 2019.

You may continue your discussion in that regards.

garfield1:

We are getting somewhere gradually.i cant take the constitution out of any argument.all points in thid case must be clearly supported by the constitution which is superior to any sentiments or inec guidelines.

Save some energy, lawyers have been paid to do the arguments at the Tribunal.

INEC and APC were trying to be too clever by half.

However, their craftiness has put them into trouble.

Inec deployed the e-collation and transmission technology basically to gain advance knowledge about the outcome of the election.

However and sadly, the outcome did not favour their paymaster.

Hence the next option was to rig and this was how the rigging happened in twists and turns.

Atiku's votes were reduced by 3.3 million votes in the north and by 3.79 million votes in the south.

On the other hand, buhari's votes were also deliberately reduced by 2.59 million in the south just to confuse investigation.

In the north buhari's votes were inflated by 991,000 votes.

260,000 in North West
619,000 in North East
112,000 in North Central

Atiku won the election but he was rigged out.

I pray he reclaims his mandate.

MXrep:

Ordinary camera recording can be a valid evidence let alone results transmitted by inec to its own server
If the law does not recognise it to be the real result it is enough evidence to void the declared result

LEAVE THE RETARDED IDIOT...

udemzyudex:


You're talking out of point as usual,go through the link I posted above,did the chairman say anything about transmitting to the collation centres or INEC server?

When we started using manual,there was nothing like card reader , everything was done manually including accreditation.
When card reader was introduced some people kicked against it but the law as ammended gave INEC the power to determine how election would be conducted.

Card reader was use for accreditation alone but this year INEC decide to use it for both accreditation and transmitting of result.

Now,if all presiding officers who conducted the election agreed that results were transmitted,this is on polling unit ,while manual will be done after taking it to collation centres Which can be several miles away from the polling unit, which one do you think will be easily tampered with?

If manual is backed by law is card reader accreditation back by law?

Card reader was use for accreditation alone but this year INEC decide to use it for both accreditation and transmitting of result.

Can you show us a written proof from electoral act or official INEC guidelines that certified transmission of results using CARD readers.

Emedu:



Card reader was use for accreditation alone but this year INEC decide to use it for both accreditation and transmitting of result.

Can you show us a written proof from electoral act or official INEC guidelines that certified transmission of results using CARD readers.

Oga please stop quoting me with stup1d questions.

Can you also show me any written prove that certified the usage of card reader for accreditation?

Pls just stop quoting me if you have nothing new to post.

udemzyudex:


Oga please stop quoting me with stup1d questions.

Can you also show me any written prove that certified the usage of card reader for accreditation?

Pls just stop quoting me if you have nothing new to post.

I don't argue without facts by my training. By the way what is your profession?

Most of the activities you see during election are backed by law and stipulated written guidelines.

So don't come here with sentiment to argue without facts