Olanipekun said the witness in his report awarded a margin of victory which the petitioners never claimed in their petition.

The lawyer also said, while the petitioners conceded defeat in Katsina State, the witness in his report of analysis of the results gave victory to the petitioners.

Gbenga, an Industrial Chemistry graduate from the University of Ilorin, who described himself as a Database Analyst and Designer, appeared before the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal in Abuja at the instance of the Peoples Democratic Party and its candidate, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar.

Both Atiku and the PDP are in their joint petition challenging President Muhammadu Buhari’s victory at the February 23, 2019 presidential election.

Under cross-examination by the respondents’ lawyers, Gbenga said he was engaged by the petitioners to analyse the results of the presidential poll in 11 out of the 36 states of the federation.

Fielding questions from Buhari’s lawyer, Olanipekun, the witness said he was not aware the petitioners conceded defeat in eight out of the 11 states which their presidential election results he analysed in his report.

Asked, the witness said he was unmindful of who won or lost in the 11 states, in order to be able to do a professional and unbiased job.

He said he had not gone through the pleadings contained in the petitioners’ petition.

Olanipekun also asked, “But are you aware that you have given them a margin of win in 11 states that is more than what they are claiming in the 36 states excluding the FCT?”



Responding, the witness said, “I am not aware. I worked on documents provided for me.”

Asked, again, he said he was not aware that the petitioners conceded defeat in Katsina State.

“But by your analysis you gave them victory,” Buhari’s lawyer said.

Asked, the witness said he had been receiving trainings in data analysis but had not been certified.

He however said he had previously been engaged by the World Health Organisations, among other organisations.

He confirmed that he was engaged to do analysis of results of the election in Yobe State.

He said the Yobe State job was the first he ever took up in respect of elections before his engagement for the presidential election.

Fielding questions from the All Progressives Congress’ lawyer, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), the witness said the job he did was not something any literate person could do as suggested by the lawyer.

The witness also said he was aware that hacking of websites was a global phenomenon.


https://punchng.com/buharis-lawyer-accuses-petitioners-data-analyst-of-awarding-atiku-victory-margin-not-claimed-in-petition/

CC Garfield1 Tuniski Engineerboat

i told the BMC crew not concentrate on only Server result. The manually collated PU results are saying PDP won in the 11 contested state

Engineerboat still dey alive??

ATIKU you can only be Nigeria's president in the imaginations of your native doctors

At the end let justice be done.

deji68:
Olanipekun said the witness in his report awarded a margin of victory which the petitioners never claimed in their petition.

The lawyer also said, while the petitioners conceded defeat in Katsina State, the witness in his report of analysis of the results gave victory to the petitioners.

Gbenga, an Industrial Chemistry graduate from the University of Ilorin, who described himself as a Database Analyst and Designer, appeared before the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal in Abuja at the instance of the Peoples Democratic Party and its candidate, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar.

Both Atiku and the PDP are in their joint petition challenging President Muhammadu Buhari’s victory at the February 23, 2019 presidential election.

Under cross-examination by the respondents’ lawyers, Gbenga said he was engaged by the petitioners to analyse the results of the presidential poll in 11 out of the 36 states of the federation.

Fielding questions from Buhari’s lawyer, Olanipekun, the witness said he was not aware the petitioners conceded defeat in eight out of the 11 states which their presidential election results he analysed in his report.

Asked, the witness said he was unmindful of who won or lost in the 11 states, in order to be able to do a professional and unbiased job.

He said he had not gone through the pleadings contained in the petitioners’ petition.

Olanipekun also asked, “But are you aware that you have given them a margin of win in 11 states that is more than what they are claiming in the 36 states excluding the FCT?”



Responding, the witness said, “I am not aware. I worked on documents provided for me.”

Asked, again, he said he was not aware that the petitioners conceded defeat in Katsina State.

“But by your analysis you gave them victory,” Buhari’s lawyer said.

Asked, the witness said he had been receiving trainings in data analysis but had not been certified.

He however said he had previously been engaged by the World Health Organisations, among other organisations.

He confirmed that he was engaged to do analysis of results of the election in Yobe State.

He said the Yobe State job was the first he ever took up in respect of elections before his engagement for the presidential election.

Fielding questions from the All Progressives Congress’ lawyer, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), the witness said the job he did was not something any literate person could do as suggested by the lawyer.

The witness also said he was aware that hacking of websites was a global phenomenon.


https://punchng.com/buharis-lawyer-accuses-petitioners-data-analyst-of-awarding-atiku-victory-margin-not-claimed-in-petition/

CC Garfield1 Tuniski Engineerboat

i told the BMC crew not concentrate on only Server result. The manually collated PU results are saying PDP won in the 11 contested state

Are you sure you are not hallucinating? Where is the manual collated result sheets please? Nobody ever concentrated on the server except atiku because he knows he lost in the manual results.wake up

Engineerboat has no network coverage in his area for now. As soon as the network returns,he will definitely comments

The day I knew Atiku was empty was the day Kadaria asked Atiku to defend corruption.Atiku ended up that day defining himself as the grand patron of corrupt elements

deji68:
Olanipekun said the witness in his report awarded a margin of victory which the petitioners never claimed in their petition.

The lawyer also said, while the petitioners conceded defeat in Katsina State, the witness in his report of analysis of the results gave victory to the petitioners.

Gbenga, an Industrial Chemistry graduate from the University of Ilorin, who described himself as a Database Analyst and Designer, appeared before the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal in Abuja at the instance of the Peoples Democratic Party and its candidate, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar.

Both Atiku and the PDP are in their joint petition challenging President Muhammadu Buhari’s victory at the February 23, 2019 presidential election.

Under cross-examination by the respondents’ lawyers, Gbenga said he was engaged by the petitioners to analyse the results of the presidential poll in 11 out of the 36 states of the federation.

Fielding questions from Buhari’s lawyer, Olanipekun, the witness said he was not aware the petitioners conceded defeat in eight out of the 11 states which their presidential election results he analysed in his report.

Asked, the witness said he was unmindful of who won or lost in the 11 states, in order to be able to do a professional and unbiased job.

He said he had not gone through the pleadings contained in the petitioners’ petition.

Olanipekun also asked, “But are you aware that you have given them a margin of win in 11 states that is more than what they are claiming in the 36 states excluding the FCT?”



Responding, the witness said, “I am not aware. I worked on documents provided for me.”

Asked, again, he said he was not aware that the petitioners conceded defeat in Katsina State.

“But by your analysis you gave them victory,” Buhari’s lawyer said.

Asked, the witness said he had been receiving trainings in data analysis but had not been certified.

He however said he had previously been engaged by the World Health Organisations, among other organisations.

He confirmed that he was engaged to do analysis of results of the election in Yobe State.

He said the Yobe State job was the first he ever took up in respect of elections before his engagement for the presidential election.

Fielding questions from the All Progressives Congress’ lawyer, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), the witness said the job he did was not something any literate person could do as suggested by the lawyer.

The witness also said he was aware that hacking of websites was a global phenomenon.


https://punchng.com/buharis-lawyer-accuses-petitioners-data-analyst-of-awarding-atiku-victory-margin-not-claimed-in-petition/

CC Garfield1 Tuniski Engineerboat

i told the BMC crew not concentrate on only Server result. The manually collated PU results are saying PDP won in the 11 contested state

He was given an assignment which he had done,

Its ledt for INEC to open their defense on what happen.

Then APC to open their defense as well.

The Attack is now on Buhari to tender his Academic qualification as conatained in his form submotted to INEC.

This is what this APC Noise makers should be concerned about not making noise about what had been said alresdy.

PDP pettitioned

1. There exist server, that had been proved.

2. SRC usage instruction by INEC was used misaplied and many voters where disenfranchised in some area, while INEC turn blond eye to apme areas that had been proved.

3. Buhari lied in his form submitted to INEC, that had been proved.

4. INEC in collision with APc manipulate result in favour of APC proved also.

The case is now in the Judge hand and for the respondents to open their defense if any.

engineerboat:
PDP pettitioned

1. There exist server, that had been proved.

2. SRC usage instruction by INEC was used misaplied and many voters where disenfranchised in some area, while INEC turn blond eye to apme areas that had been proved.

3. Buhari lied in his form submitted to INEC, that had been proved.

4. INEC in collision with APc manipulate result in favour of APC proved also.

The case is now in the Judge hand and for the respondents to open their defense if any.

Another PDP witness has just come on board.Every thing was proven according to you but failed to show how they were proven

Atiku

Pdp sha wan remain relevants till 2023

garfield1:

Are you sure you are not hallucinating? Where is the manual collated result sheets please? Nobody ever concentrated on the server except atiku because he knows he lost in the manual results.wake up

The manually collated sheets are there too. Atiku was prepared and concentrated on everything.

He is giving INEC real challenge.

garfield1:

Are you sure you are not hallucinating? Where is the manual collated result sheets please? Nobody ever concentrated on the server except atiku because he knows he lost in the manual results.wake up

Thought youre bragging and telling someone that he did ot watch tribunal proceeding some days ago.

Seem youre the one watching from the back of your TV,


Why do you think INEC chaiman was subpoena
Why do you think INEC produce what was requested fprm them.

Go and update yourself on what was submitted by INEC.

Ultimatezlant:
Atifku really goofed he thought everything was about money as agreed by obj.


I was expecting atiku petition to be water tight, how do you just dash people money without verifying you get value for money (I guess money when you nor labour for nor dey hard to dash)

Seem you don't really understand whats going on at the tribunal , but just been moved by APC diversions and propganda machine's

engineerboat:
PDP pettitioned

1. There exist server, that had been proved.

2. SRC usage instruction by INEC was used misaplied and many voters where disenfranchised in some area, while INEC turn blond eye to apme areas that had been proved.

3. Buhari lied in his form submitted to INEC, that had been proved.

4. INEC in collision with APc manipulate result in favour of APC proved also.

The case is now in the Judge hand and for the respondents to open their defense if any.

village square meeting ways of proving.

The man even said he has not been certified. Why is Atiku legal team doing him like this?

engineerboat:
PDP pettitioned

1. There exist server, that had been proved.

2. SRC usage instruction by INEC was used misaplied and many voters where disenfranchised in some area, while INEC turn blond eye to apme areas that had been proved.

3. Buhari lied in his form submitted to INEC, that had been proved.

4. INEC in collision with APc manipulate result in favour of APC proved also.

The case is now in the Judge hand and for the respondents to open their defense if any.

No need to open any defense.its been won and lost.
1) no reasonable prove as to the existence of a server,its mere hearsay and speculative at best.
2 application or misapplication of scr is not part of atiku's pleadings or prayers.read his petition well.
3 none of atiku's witnesses gave any tangible prove that buhari has no certificate.another hearsay.anyway,its a pre election matter and would be dismissed.
4) no reasonable prove that there was any manipulation or substantial manipulation of results.all atiku's witnesses fumbled except a few polling unit agents and the agents for damboa,kukawa,kaduna south and dass lga.unfortunately,its not substantial even if the lg results are canceled.
Atiku couldn't even call any voter to testify.the judges will unanimously dismiss the useless case.even adeleke did far better

muykem:
The man even said he has not been certified. Why is Atiku legal team doing him like this?

Very funny.that statement alone nullified his entire testimony.i dont know why pdp fans cant see this

engineerboat:


Thought youre bragging and telling someone that he did ot watch tribunal proceeding some days ago.

Seem youre the one watching from the back of your TV,


Why do you think INEC chaiman was subpoena
Why do you think INEC produce what was requested fprm them.

Go and update yourself on what was submitted by INEC.

Unfortunately for you,yakubu didnt come and those documents were mere formalities.seems you didnt know why your team asked for more time to present their case.those documents are just being dumped on the court.

tuniski:


The manually collated sheets are there too. Atiku was prepared and concentrated on everything.

He is giving INEC real challenge.

You are funny.did he at any time use them to demonstrate any manipulation? So you think those judges will come down and start going through those documents one by one

engineerboat:


Seem you don't really understand whats going on at the tribunal , but just been moved by APC diversions and propganda machine's

You are the one still lost just like in osun.better forget about this case before you become depressed

garfield1:

You are funny.did he at any time use them to demonstrate any manipulation? So you think those judges will come down and start going through those documents one by one

At least, you agreed he brought them. Now at the end when the written submission is being made, wait for how the petitioner will link them.

So far, tones of documents have been presented,how the petitioner links them is part reason they are SAN/professionals.

The petitioners are driving their case based on their own strategies not yours.Neither of the many cyberspace ranters.

For me, I am broad minded about it and watching to see the end game. The intricacies of legal battle interest me more than the court verdict.

tuniski:


At least, you agreed he brought them. Now at the end when the written submission is being made, wait for how the petitioner will link them.

So far, tones of documents have been presented,how the petitioner links them is part reason they are SAN/professionals.

The petitioners are driving their case based on their own strategies not yours.Neither of the many cyberspace ranters.

For me, I am broad minded about it and watching to see the end game. The intricacies of legal battle interest me more than the court verdict.

I told you adeleke will fail and am telling you atiku has failed.let it gi

Ultimatezlant:
Atifku really goofed he thought everything was about money as agreed by obj.


I was expecting atiku petition to be water tight, how do you just dash people money without verifying you get value for money (I guess money when you nor labour for nor dey hard to dash)

Initially I thought it was your money. Leave him with his goof and let him waste his resources. He certainly ain't complaining. He never did all through his spending on politics.

The economy of legal practitioners is enhanced during litigation cos they are largely private firms.

If everybody is dismissive and broke to pursue litigation, then lawyers and other supporting workers will starve.

I am happy an Atiku is the petitioner cos he can fund the very expensive legal battle.

garfield1:

I told you adeleke will fail and am telling you atiku has failed.let it gi

So what? Adeleke fail so? The issues remain unresolved. In any trial someone will win. This fixation on Osun is boring.

tuniski:

So what? Adeleke fail so? The issues remain unresolved. In any trial someone will win. This fixation on Osun is boring.

It is not boring but a good instance,a precedent.seems you lack foresight and comprehension..
Sometimes,you advocate for the perfect,utopian system in your imaginations.it is possible but not now.it is an insult for someone like you in pdp to be advocating for such.its better you join a new party

garfield1:

It is not boring but a good instance,a precedent.seems you lack foresight and comprehension..
Sometimes,you advocate for the perfect,utopian system in your imaginations.it is possible but not now.it is an insult for someone like you in pdp to be advocating for such.its better you join a new party

Too boring. But you can remain fixated it is your choice.

Welll u are the one hallucinating , failing to see the larger picture ... the 11 contested states and over 50000 CTC admitted in evidence the will determine this case..that is why Olanipekun was trying to argue that vicory margin in Analyst report were not in the petition.

garfield1:

Are you sure you are not hallucinating? Where is the manual collated result sheets please? Nobody ever concentrated on the server except atiku because he knows he lost in the manual results.wake up

Well you are programmed to say trash....boring

yarimo:
ATIKU you can only be Nigeria's president in the imaginations of your native doctors

deji68:
Welll u are the one hallucinating , failing to see the larger picture ... the 11 contested state and over 50000 CTC admittedidence the will determine this case..that is why Olanipekun was trying to argue that vicory margin in Analyst report were not in the petition.

Atiku has lost this.the earlier you get it,the better novice

tuniski:

Too boring. But you can remain fixated it is your choice.

Seems your mistaking entertainment section for politics.please snap back to reality