Presidential Election: What the PDP and Atiku/Obi presented to the Supreme Court...How Buhari lied on Oath

*Ground of Appeal Number 9*

One of the grounds of appeal presented before the Supreme Court by the PDP and Atiku/Obi is the fact that the 2nd Respondent (President Muhammadi Buhai), failed to attach the certificates he claimed in his form CF001to INEC.

President Buhari had lied on oath that he attended Primary School and has Primary School Certificate in 1952. That he has Secondary education and WASC in 1961 and for his Higher School he stated “OFFICER CADET” 1963.

But no certificates were attached to his form CF001 as required by law. Rather, President Buhari attached an affidavit, the same one he deposed to in 2014, stating that his certificates were currently with the Nigerian Army..

But the Army through its Secretary, Brigadier General Olajide Laleye, in 2014 told the world that the Army does not have President Buhari’s certificates as claimed by him in the said affidavit.

PARTICULARS OF ERROR:

1. Form CF001 mandatorily requires that the 2nd Respondent (Muhammadu Buhari), was to attach his qualifying certificates; which requirement was not fulfilled by the 2nd Respondent.

2. Evidence was led by the Appellants (PDP and Atiku/Obi) to show that the 2nd Respondent (President Muhammadu Buhari) does not possess the Certificates he listed in Form CF001.

3. The Appellants (PDP and Atiku/Obi) having established that the 2nd Respondent (President Muhammadu Buhari) does not have the certificates to attach to his Form CF001, the burden of proof shifted to the 2nd Respondent (Muhammadu Buhari) to prove, in accordance with the mandatory requirement of Form CF001, the schools he attended and attach the certificates obtained, to authenticate that claim, which burden the 2nd Respondent failed to discharge.

4. The evidence of RW1 and RW2 and the contents of the 2nd Respondent’s CV are not substitutes for the documentary evidence of the qualifying certificates.

5. The 2nd Respondent (Muhammadu Buhari), who had claimed on oath that he possesses the Certificates for Primary School, Secondary School and “Officer Cadet” in part C of Form CF001 was shown not to have those Certificates, and the 2nd Respondent (Muhammadu Buhari) was not able to produce the said Certificates.

6. The lower Court was wrong to equate the 2nd Respondent’s (Muhammadu Buhari) attendance of Primary School, Secondary School, and Officer Cadet Course, for the representation of the 2nd Respondent that he possesses these Certificates.

7. The lower Court was wrong to infer that the 2nd Respondent (Muhammadu Buhari) handed over his certificates to the Secretary Military Board at any time whatsoever.

8. There was oral evidence from RW1 to the effect that the representation of 2nd Respondent (Muhammadu Buhari) of having submitted his “Certificates” to military authorities was false.

9. There was evidence from PW1 and PW2 and from Exhibits P80 and P24 on the denials of the Military Authorities that they are in possession of 2nd Respondent’s “Certificates” as deposed to on Oath by 2nd Respondent (Muhammadu Buhari).

It’s time to #RescueNigeria

Pls after supreme court, which other higher court can one go in case you disagree with the ruling of the supreme court?

Cos I don't want this cuming to end few months from now.

DEAD ON ARRIVAL.

Lawyers make una carry go biko......

It's ya time to shine!

good luck

[s]

post=82779029:
DEAD ON ARRIVAL.

Lawyers make una carry go biko......

It's ya time to shine!

[/s]

No server case

Still on the matter. Case study continues...

Simplyleo:
Pls after supreme court, which other higher court can one go in case you disagree with the ruling of the supreme court?

Cos I don't want this cuming to end few months from now.

China Court

Atiku is no longer claiming he won the election. They made so much noise about the fake server results but they cannot even present it as a ground of appeal.

The issue of certificates is another matter that is dead on arrival. They are on a wild goose chase again.

The only serious ground of appeal from the PEPT judgement is the issue of perjury. Even at that, they will struggle to prove it because a 2014 politically motivated press statement by Gen. Olajide Laleye may not be acceptable by the apex court as the true position of the Nigeria Army. Nevertheless, we await the decision of the Supreme Court on the appeal.

Lawyers sha!!! They must eat anyhow. How can we explain to them that they will understand? There's no where either in our constitution or electoral act that requires certificate of candidates to be submitted to INEC but evidence that the candidate enducated up to SSCE I.e affidavit or even letter from principal is suffix. If you want to prove that Buhari is not educated up to SSCE then collect cambridge list of graduates in 1961 in that school and if Buhari name is not there then he should be disqualified.