Imo Supreme Court Judgment: To Set Aside or Not To Set Aside?

The issue here is not whether the Supreme Court can over rule itself or not...The allegation here is that of "fraud" because what was allegedly delivered (read out of judgment) is not now on the hardcopy of the judgment subsequently given to the parties.

This sad development may not be totally unexpected given the public outcry and uproar, as well as, analysis on the incongruity of the gap between accredited voters and actual scores now allocated by the judgment.
In this view, yes there is a possibility of the review of the judgement.
So we challenge the record of the SC. That is the record of 14th from hardcopy judgment. By law, a person challenging the record (hardcopy judgment) must swear to an affidavit. Obviously to be attached as Exhibits to the affidavit is/are what the applicant says is the correct record (audio or whatever of pronouncement of 14th Jan)
See Horst Sommer v. FHA (1992) LPELR-3103 (SC); Gonzee Nig Ltd v. NERDC (2005) LPELR-1332(SC); Chief of Army Staff v. Isah (2017) LPELR-41979(CA)
The record of the judgment (hardcopy) is different from reality of 14th and with this the subsequent record of the Supreme Court is a product of fraud and manipulation and should be nullified and set aside.

See full details here
http://www.nigeriantelegraph.com/2020/01/imo-supreme-court-judgment-to-set-aside.html