Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,156,771 members, 7,831,478 topics. Date: Friday, 17 May 2024 at 07:24 PM

Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court - Politics (2) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court (29419 Views)

Ihedioha To Storm Okorocha’s Estate With “Citizens" / Ihedioha To Sign Order On TSA As Imo Uncovers 250 Accounts Operated By Okorocha / Okorocha Urges Ihedioha To Continue Free Education, Keep Alive His 1000 Projects (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by Nobody: 9:59am On Mar 01, 2020
this embarrassing judgement that set dangerous precedent should be reverse

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by happney65: 10:02am On Mar 01, 2020
Sunnymatey:
Jst arrange your N60m come monday.

100million sef..lol

4 Likes

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by fergie001: 10:05am On Mar 01, 2020
Tomorrow beckons.......
Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by AstroG: 10:05am On Mar 01, 2020
tsephanyah:
Wow!


Oya come and say ur normal rubbish

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by Openbusiness: 10:05am On Mar 01, 2020
Another 60m fine loading, if you know, you know cheesy

2 Likes

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by Sufisunni: 10:06am On Mar 01, 2020
Racoon:
The Imo case is clear case of judicial injustice hence a culdesac the supreme court must redeem itself from.
Emeka didn't even have 25% of votes cast in 2/3 LGA of Imo state. Worst case scenario will be to cancel the entire election and order new one.

2 Likes

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by olisaEze(m): 10:07am On Mar 01, 2020
This is what u get when a Sharia court judge is made the CJN. If to say e pass Lit in English, e for know say the future is determined by the past. Just confusing law students Upandan! No recourse to precedence, the one being set now can only lead to confusion if referred to in the future. This man and his people have so destroyed Naija. angry

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by Alwaysachick: 10:07am On Mar 01, 2020
Very convincing....beyond reasonable doubt except Tanko wants to reason with his anus grin
Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by Openbusiness: 10:08am On Mar 01, 2020
Sunnymatey:
Jst arrange your N60m come monday.
To reverse their judgment will make them the most useless and incompetent supreme Court in the history of the whole world. Why would they do that to themselves. Even though they know they did a terrible wrong, they will rather die and maintain status quo than to reverse it and become the laughing stock of the world for centuries to come. Na one chance Ihedioha dey so oooh cheesy

3 Likes

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by Alwaysachick: 10:11am On Mar 01, 2020
Openbusiness:

To reverse their judgment will make them the most useless and incompetent supreme Court in the history of the whole world. Why would they do that to themselves. Even though they know they did a terrible wrong, they will rather die and maintain status quo than to reverse it and become the laughing stock of the world for centuries to come. Na one chance Ihedioha dey so oooh cheesy


I don't think so, they gave judgment with the supposed evidence.

PDP as at then had no case in court, so they didnt fault in any way. But its let for PDP now to proof beyond reasonable doubt that Hope's numbers were falsified.

1 Like

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by josite: 10:15am On Mar 01, 2020
tomorrow supreme court will do the unthinkable.will recommend lawyers for disbarments.their names will be moved to be taken of the roll of lawyers.it will not be money fines.

1 Like

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by TrebleChamp(m): 10:16am On Mar 01, 2020
Hope Uzodinma will be #100m richer by the end of 2moro...
Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by winterfell007(m): 10:17am On Mar 01, 2020
The case in Imo State is clearly as error on the part of Supreme Justice. How could they have validated such concocted figures by has been repudiated by INEC on the grounds of irregularities. Does it mean that the Supreme Court now entertains perjury in its hallowed chambers??

2 Likes

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by MoIbrahim: 10:19am On Mar 01, 2020
J111333:
Ihedioha has a good case if presented well.
I wish him good luck.

Good case that should set precedence for review of supreme court judgement? What then is supreme about the court?

You people should be deceiving yourselves there o.
Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by fabre4: 10:19am On Mar 01, 2020
Wiseandtrue:
Any right thinking judge knows that Ihedioha has a case!!!

He did no wrong, as a citizen, he has the right to appeal the great injustice and his mandate which was BOLDLY snatched from him!!!

Restore the hope of the masses in the judiciary, do the right thing!!!

History never forgets!!!

All PDP has to do is to prove is that they and INEC sufficiently contested the results Hope Uzodimma presented in court. If they can't do that well no amount facts will change the decision of the supreme Court

3 Likes

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by Openbusiness: 10:20am On Mar 01, 2020
Alwaysachick:



I don't think so, they gave judgment with the supposed evidence.

PDP as at then had no case in court, so they didnt fault in any way. But its let for PDP now to proof beyond reasonable doubt that Hope's numbers were falsified.
There's nothing to prove again because judgment on the matter has already been delivered. Ihedioha is just wasting his time and money. He should save it for 2023, same thing with Lyon.
Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by Afamed: 10:23am On Mar 01, 2020
Supreme court and Apc definitely will be N2b richer tomorrow
Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by Alwaysachick: 10:25am On Mar 01, 2020
Openbusiness:

There's nothing to prove again because judgment on the matter has already been delivered. Ihedioha is just wasting his time and money. He should save it for 2023, same thing with Lyon.


Don't be too sure
Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by Truthbites: 10:30am On Mar 01, 2020
Fear of what happened to Bayelsa APC plus lawyers.
Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by Viktom(m): 10:30am On Mar 01, 2020
Ihedioha will easily win tomorrow, I sense the hand of the presidency in this. Buhari want to convince Nigerians that he believe in the rule of law. after tomorrow watch out for the kind of judgements the supreme court will start dishing out.

1 Like

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by victorazyvictor(m): 10:33am On Mar 01, 2020
kahal29:


He has no case but a HUGE FINE awaits him tomorrow.

Idiot

1 Like

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by supereagle(m): 10:35am On Mar 01, 2020
I will see the yansh of PDP tomorrow. APC lawyers won't do mumu tomorrow. Hope has come for IMO( Fr Mbaka, 2020)
Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by mrphysics(m): 10:37am On Mar 01, 2020
CanadaOrBust:


Here is what I don’t understand about people like u: Can’t u forget having a sentimental favorite for a second, and just step back and broadly look at what it is u r supporting??
Can’t u see that if this embarrassment of a judgement is let stand it diminishes every Nigerian including you yourself? Because it blatantly rewards clear cheating and forgery that even kids can tell is cheating and forgery. How can u teach children about not cheating when they can see for themselves that the final court in the land rewards cheating and forgery?? Also, at the very least, it greatly reduces your ability to have a say in who governs u because it allows for any ruling party to “win” any election it wishes, which will inevitably lead to a one-party country.

A Supreme Court overrules all lower courts plus INEC in order to replace an 8-month gov with a 4th place finisher, all based on clearly fraudulent documents. And here u are, gloating about it!

Anyway, whatever happens, the leaders of thought in the country and international community are watching the case. They understand what is at stake and have made their positions clear.
————————————————-

Nobel Laureate, Prof. Wole Soyinka, Prof. Pat Utomi, Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar, leadership of the Nigerian Bar Association, others, to monitor Supreme Court Imo judgement review.

Ihedioha Vs Uzodinma: Civil Society Leaders Urge Supreme Court To Reverse Judgment


BY SAHARAREPORTERS, FEB 11, 2020

Leaders of civil society in Nigeria have asked the Supreme Court to set aside its judgment pronouncing Hope Uzodinma as duly elected governor of Imo State...

The group posited that the court erred in its judgment and faulted the process through which the apex court arrived at the decision.
In the statement signed by Dr Olusegun Awe Obe, the Concerned Leaders of Thought and Conscience in Project Nigeria, highlighted reasons the court should not have pronounced Uzodinma as winner of the election...
Stop wasting your time and energy. There's nothing at stake. The supreme court will let you know again that No court on "Earth" will review it's judgement.

Maybe a Canada Court will
Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by Openbusiness: 10:37am On Mar 01, 2020
Alwaysachick:



Don't be too sure
It's not about me being too sure or not too sure. It's about what the Supreme Court is and what it represents, the final arbiter! They delivered judgment and it is final, whether that judgment is correct or not. The Supreme Court cannot review a case it has already delivered judgment on. It could review another similar case in future that comes before it and deliver the correct thing, but this old case is a forgone issue. They already fined the APC lawyers 60m for daring to put the Supreme Court in a self-compromising position. They might drop a sledgehammer on PDP lawyers for not withdrawing the request for review after they set an example with those APC lawyers. Those guys will definitely get a stiffer penalty, so that no other lawyers will dare ask the Supreme Court for review of its judgment again. You wait and see smiley

3 Likes 1 Share

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by kahal29: 10:40am On Mar 01, 2020
Racoon:
No need for that yet.The supreme court judgement on Imo is still a clear case of wrong judicial indecision that even the apex court justices are thoroughly ashame of even if they cant openly admit it.It will set a legal precedence that will forever hunt them in histroy.

My Oga, somehow I have respect for you in this forum so I will take time to explain to you where Ihedioha got it wrong and why the Supreme Court justices cannot be blamed for the way the case went.

How is Imo judgement a case of judicial indecision?

Whose responsibility was it to have raised the issues Ihedioha is raising now?...... The supreme court judges or Ihedioha's lawyers?

Was the question of spread and accredited votes brought before them that they didn't rule on it? Of course you know the court is not a father Christmas to give you what you didn't ask for OR are you insinuating that the Supreme Court should have helped Ihedioha's CASE by descending into the arena?

Judgements are delivered based on pleadings and issues joined. This, Justice Kekerekun clearly stated in her judgement.

To prove some of the things Ihedioha is asking for now requires calling of experts witnesses from INEC/others and that cannot happen because it will amount to FULL BLOWN RE LITIGATION.


See Ihedioha's case failed due to lack of diligent prosecution and he cannot correct it now. His lawyers concentrated so much on Uche Nwosu case that they didn't do due diligence to Uzodinma's case.

What is he is asking the Supreme Court to do is not a Review but to re-litigate the matter.

Is like a team asking for a replay match because one of their defenders was sick on the day the main match was played or cancel a match because a particular goal which was accepted was scored from an off side position.

1 Like

Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by hisexcellency34: 10:48am On Mar 01, 2020
Stubborn goat...your lawyers not yet through with you
Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by Badguy89: 10:50am On Mar 01, 2020
Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by Badguy89: 10:53am On Mar 01, 2020
kahal29:


My Oga, somehow I have respect for you in this forum so I will take time to explain to you where Ihedioha got it wrong and why the Supreme Court justices cannot be blamed for the way the case went.

How is Imo judgement a case of judicial indecision?

Whose responsibility was it to have raised the issues Ihedioha is raising now?...... The supreme court judges or Ihedioha's lawyers?

Was the question of spread and accredited votes brought before them that they didn't rule on it? Of course you know the court is not a father Christmas to give you what you didn't ask for OR are you insinuating that the Supreme Court should have helped Ihedioha's CASE by descending into the arena?

Judgements are delivered based on pleadings and issues joined. This, Justice Kekerekun clearly stated in her judgement.

To prove some of the things Ihedioha is asking for now requires calling of experts witnesses from INEC/others and that cannot happen because it will amount to FULL BLOWN RE LITIGATION.


See Ihedioha's case failed due to lack of diligent prosecution and he cannot correct it now. His lawyers concentrated so much on Uche Nwosu case that they didn't do due diligence to Uzodinma's case.

What is he is asking the Supreme Court to do is not a Review but to re-litigate the matter.

Is like a team asking for a replay match because one of their defenders was sick on the day the main match was played or cancel a match because a particular goal which was accepted was scored from an off side position.

I am not a lawyer but please read this.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2020/02/29/imo-bayelsa-a-case-of-different-facts-disparate-circumstances/amp/

Secondly Ihedioha doesn't need new witnesses. Rather he is only showing the Supreme Court the judicial and constitutional blunders it committed. I haven't seen the judgement but how will an election hv more voters than the total registered voters.
Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by josite: 10:56am On Mar 01, 2020
Openbusiness:

It's not about me being too sure or not too sure. It's about what the Supreme Court is and what it represents, the final arbiter! They delivered judgment and it is final, whether that judgment is correct or not. The Supreme Court cannot review a case it has already delivered judgment on. It could review another similar case in future that comes before it and deliver the correct thing, but this old case is a forgone issue. They already fined the APC lawyers 60m for daring to put the Supreme Court in a self-compromising position. They might drop a sledgehammer on PDP lawyers for not withdrawing the request for review after they set an example with those APC lawyers. Those guys will definitely get a stiffer penalty, so that no other lawyers will dare ask the Supreme Court for review of its judgment again. You wait and see smiley


im very sure you are a lawyer.and i must say a very sound lawyer
Re: Why Imo Case Is Different From Bayelsa, Ihedioha To Supreme Court by modsareuseless: 10:58am On Mar 01, 2020
kahal29:






Oga no need for plenty talk........ Just dey arrange the 100 million fine una go pay tomorrow

typical illiterates. i don't expect more from APC supporters

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (Reply)

Osun PDP Leaders After A Closed-Door Meeting Held In Oyinlola's Country Home / Dogara Urges Nigerians To Forgive Boko Haram Members / Rivers People Now Viewed As Barbarians That Behead Fellow Human Beings’ – APC

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 61
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.