Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,153,499 members, 7,819,813 topics. Date: Tuesday, 07 May 2024 at 12:25 AM

Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja - Politics (5) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja (49963 Views)

WAEC Denies Gregory Ibe’s Certificate As He Faces Fresh Legal Hurdles / Demolition Of Billboards Commences In Uyo Metropolis (Photos) / Bitumen Exploitation Commences In Ondo State As Equipment Land In Irele (PHOTOS) (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by Odogwu230: 6:59pm On Jul 08, 2020
NaijaRoyalty:
The supreme court governor must Go!
he is not going anywhere he is doing well
Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by fergie001: 7:12pm On Jul 08, 2020
babaolofin:
This NJC has issues.
We all know how Tanko became CJN...
The NBA President (himself a member of the NJC), is enmeshed in deep corruption waters.
Now you know...

I always appreciate your contributions and that of Fergie001 on legal matters on nairaland, but in reality, based on my personal opinion, the arguments, submissions and deep reasonings and even technicalties are mere academic exercise under the present Judiciary and it seems NJC and NBA cannot do anything. Intelligent Lawyers can be fined and silenced. The matter of Uche Nwosu being recognized by SC as the authentic APC candidate is a valid judgement that would have been considered when Ihedioha team pointed to it, but was ignored.
Permit me as this might be long........
The APC Primaries was held on October 01, 2018.
Uche Nwosu CLAIMED he won the elections announced by his faction on October 06, 2018.
On October 09 2018, he sought an interim injunction compelling the Party to submit his name to INEC as the flagbearer for the 2019 elections. This plea was granted by Justice Valentine Ashi (now deceased) of the FCT High Court, Apo Division.
NOTE: Interim Injunctions aren't life-long.

Prince Madumere (Deputy Governor of Imo State), one of the Aspirants in the said Primaries had taken the case to Court in Suit No HOW/756/2018 at the Imo State High Court.
On Nov 21, 2018..Justice Kemakolam Ojiako upheld all prayers....
A. That the Party should send the name of the winner of the Primaries, Hope Uzodinma, as announced.

B. That the Primary elections was fair and free and barred the Party from submitting the name of any other candidate.
This case wasn't appealed by Nwosu till date.
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2018/11/madumere-floors-okorocha-again-in-court/amp/

FACTS
Due to the stiff opposition, he was offered the AA ticket, which he took.
Leonard Okolienta, an AA Chieftain had taken him to Court that he was the authentic flagbearer for AA, and not Nwosu.
He failed to show substantial proofs and rightly lost at the High, Appellate and Supreme Courts respectively, who upheld that Nwosu was the authentic candidate of the AA for the 2019 elections.

February 27, 2019....the APP and its Deputy National Chairman, Nnadi, had asked the Federal High Court, Abuja to interprete Section 37 of the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended). Section 37 surrounds penalties involved with multiple nominations when the person involved "knowingly" avails himself. (APC & Uzodinma weren't parties to the suit)

Justice Ekwo ruled that based on the order of October 9 wherein Nwosu CLAIMED he won the Primaries, Nwosu also took the AA ticket, without first showing cause for resignation from his former party, the APC.

WHAT WAS EKWO'S JUDGEMENT;

“An order of this honourable court is hereby made directing the 1st defendant (INEC) to remove the name of the 2nd defendant (Nwosu) as the governorship of the 3rd defendant (AA) in the 2019 Imo State governorship election for multiple nomination in violation of the provision of section 37 of the Electoral Act 2018 (as amended).

“An order of this honourable court is hereby made restraining the 1st defendant (INEC) from recognising the 2nd defendant (Nwosu) as the governorship of the 3rd defendant (AA) and/or any other political party for the 2019 Imo State governorship election.

“An order of this honourable court is hereby made restraining the 1st defendant (INEC) from giving value to any act done in pursuance of the 2nd defendant purported candidature of the 3rd defendant (AA) and/or any other political party in the 2019 Imo State governorship election”, the judge held.
https://businessday.ng/politics/article/court-sets-aside-nomination-of-uche-nwosu-as-governorship-candidate/amp/
The Appellate and Supreme Courts agreed with Ekwo's judgement.

This judgement didn't compel APC on anything. There was never a prayer wrt the APC or its candidate.
The SC in SC.1384/2019 didn't decide on who won the Primaries, neither did it authenticate NWOSU as flagbeàr but decided on the "double nomination" of Nwosu.

EVERY CASE IS A MERIT ON ITS OWN.

It based its judgement on Nwosu's CLAIM and not the "meat" involved with the authentic candidate(s) which had been decided on Nov 21, 2018 which wasn't appealed against.


There are several cases that contradict themselves beginning from Amaechi and Celestine Omeliha to the present IMO case and many are still coming. Edo is on awaiting result until after election. The final governor in Edo State would be by Supreme Court. After IMO and Bayelsa Supreme Court judgements, It now dawn on me that Ganduje and Wike exchange of words is a preparatory seminars for after election tussle.
Amaechi/Omehia case was correct at the time...2007.
Our Electoral Act at the time, saw the position as owned by the Party.

The amendment that came on in 2010 changed all of that.
Now you must go through all stages of the election or your Party loses out.

CONTRADICTIONS:
Section 285(9) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) was very clear that all pre-election cases should commence within 14 days after the cause of action (Party Primaries).
However, APP filed close to 4 months after Primaries had ended, yet, Justice Ekwo, dwelt on the legality and illegality of it.
His sentiments was also shared by the Appellate and Supreme Courts.

MY OWN THOUGHTS;
I just think the Courts, SC inclusive, were ambushed in this Imo case.


dansuqi ejimatic kahal29 agborojietoye
Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by Dansuqi: 7:19pm On Jul 08, 2020
fergie001:

This NJC has issues.
We all know how Tanko became CJN...
The NBA President (himself a member of the NJC), is enmeshed in deep corruption waters.
Now you know...


Permit me as this might be long........
The APC Primaries was held on October 01, 2018.
Uche Nwosu CLAIMED he won the elections announced by his faction on October 06, 2018.
On October 09 2018, he sought an interim injunction compelling the Party to submit his name to INEC as the flagbearer for the 2019 elections. This plea was granted by Justice Valentine Ashi (now deceased) of the FCT High Court, Apo Division.
NOTE: Interim Injunctions aren't life-long.

Prince Madumere (Deputy Governor of Imo State), one of the Aspirants in the said Primaries had taken the case to Court in Suit No HOW/756/2018 at the Imo State High Court.
On Nov 21, 2018..Justice Kemakolam Ojiako upheld all prayers....
A. That the Party should send the name of the winner of the Primaries, Hope Uzodinma, as announced.

B. That the Primary elections was fair and free and barred the Party from submitting the name of any other candidate.
This case wasn't appealed by Nwosu till date.
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2018/11/madumere-floors-okorocha-again-in-court/amp/

FACTS
Due to the stiff opposition, he was offered the AA ticket, which he took.
Leonard Okolienta, an AA Chieftain had taken him to Court that he was the authentic flagbearer for AA, and not Nwosu.
He failed to show substantial proofs and rightly lost at the High, Appellate and Supreme Courts respectively, who upheld that Nwosu was the authentic candidate of the AA for the 2019 elections.

February 27, 2019....the APP and its Deputy National Chairman, Nnadi, had asked the Federal High Court, Abuja to interprete Section 37 of the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended). Section 37 surrounds penalties involved with multiple nominations when the person involved "knowingly" avails himself. (APC & Uzodinma weren't parties to the suit)

Justice Ekwo ruled that based on the order of October 9 wherein Nwosu CLAIMED he won the Primaries, Nwosu also took the AA ticket, without first showing cause for resignation from his former party, the APC.

WHAT WAS EKWO'S JUDGEMENT;

“An order of this honourable court is hereby made directing the 1st defendant (INEC) to remove the name of the 2nd defendant (Nwosu) as the governorship of the 3rd defendant (AA) in the 2019 Imo State governorship election for multiple nomination in violation of the provision of section 37 of the Electoral Act 2018 (as amended).

“An order of this honourable court is hereby made restraining the 1st defendant (INEC) from recognising the 2nd defendant (Nwosu) as the governorship of the 3rd defendant (AA) and/or any other political party for the 2019 Imo State governorship election.

“An order of this honourable court is hereby made restraining the 1st defendant (INEC) from giving value to any act done in pursuance of the 2nd defendant purported candidature of the 3rd defendant (AA) and/or any other political party in the 2019 Imo State governorship election”, the judge held.
https://businessday.ng/politics/article/court-sets-aside-nomination-of-uche-nwosu-as-governorship-candidate/amp/
The Appellate and Supreme Courts agreed with Ekwo's judgement.

This judgement didn't compel APC on anything. There was never a prayer wrt the APC or its candidate.
The SC in SC.1384/2019 didn't decide on who won the Primaries, neither did it authenticate NWOSU as flagbeàr but decided on the "double nomination" of Nwosu.

EVERY CASE IS A MERIT ON ITS OWN.

It based its judgement on Nwosu's CLAIM and not the "meat" involved with the authentic candidate(s) which had been decided on Nov 21, 2018 which wasn't appealed against.



Amaechi/Omehia case was correct at the time...2007.
Our Electoral Act at the time, saw the position as owned by the Party.

The amendment that came on in 2010 changed all of that.
Now you must go through all stages of the election or your Party loses out.

CONTRADICTIONS:
Section 285(9) of the 199) Constitution as amended was very clear that all pre-election cases should have a life span of 14 days after the cause of action (Party Primaries).
However, APP filed close to 4 months after Primaries had ended, yet, Justice Ekwo, dwelt on the legality and illegality of it.
His sentiments was also shared by the Appellate and Supreme Courts.

MY OWN THOUGHTS;
I just think the Courts, SC inclusive, were ambushed in this Imo case.


dansuqi ejimatic kahal29 agborojietoye

You like contradicting and making things hard for yourself. you made brilliant points and presentations and went into an anti climax by spoiling it.where was the judicial ambush?

Again,don't forget that even though the case filed by app was out of time,the defendants needed to remind the court that it was filed out of time and I don't think they did
Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by idahme(m): 8:22pm On Jul 08, 2020
seunmsg:


Don’t be deceived, there is absolutely nothing in the case. It is time barred so the court will throw it out without looking at the merit.


already raised your opinion in my post read carefully again......
Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by Killdemboth: 8:25pm On Jul 08, 2020
BeijinDossier:
[s]Where's the cursed useless old man called abagworo? Your supreme court governor is about to go down.

Okoroawusa and Ihedioha looted and left, Hopeless Uzodimma is now looting his own.

Imo state is in deep trouble with over 153 billion naira internal debt, borrowed and looted with nothing to show in the state.

Good job to Okoroawusa, Ihedioha and Hopeless Uzodimma for making sure that Imo state remained down with endless political crisis that ensured backwardness cheesy[/s]

This useless Chino you have not told us what IMO state did to you that you want to die on their matter.
Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by osusuallstars: 8:46pm On Jul 08, 2020
Anything that will remove this pig is highly welcomed

1 Like 1 Share

Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by Christmasdon(m): 8:55pm On Jul 08, 2020
proeast:
How would all these distractions help Imo state?! Nigeria's judicial system is as failed as the Nigerian state itself.

Tufiakwa!
.THEY SHOULD GIVE THEM THEIR MANDATE.

1 Like

Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by Billygee2u: 11:14pm On Jul 08, 2020
NaijaRoyalty:
The supreme court governor must Go!
Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by Billygee2u: 11:15pm On Jul 08, 2020
osusuallstars:
Anything that will remove the chief YahooMan is highly welcomed
Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by Billygee2u: 11:19pm On Jul 08, 2020
Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by Billygee2u: 11:22pm On Jul 08, 2020
Agboriotejoye:
I always felt his legitimacy as candidate of APC ought to be contested given the SC's affirmation of Uche Nwosu as valid APC candidate for the election. Note that the primaries that produced Uzodinma was different from the one that produced Nwosu. Which means it's illegal
cc: fergie001, Dansuqi
Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by Billygee2u: 11:25pm On Jul 08, 2020
SmartProf:
Lol...this man got a black market judgement from the Supreme Court. He feels to me like a non-eligible player captaining a football team in a world cup tournament.
Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by Billygee2u: 11:25pm On Jul 08, 2020
Racoon:

The supreme court abracadabra masked all these observations you have raised just to created this unprecedented judicial robbery of installing the supreme court governor.The illegality of that judgement will continue to reverberate.
Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by fergie001: 12:06am On Jul 09, 2020
Dansuqi:


You like contradicting and making things hard for yourself. you made brilliant points and presentations and went into an anti climax by spoiling it.where was the judicial ambush?

Again,don't forget that even though the case filed by app was out of time,the defendants needed to remind the court that it was filed out of time and I don't think they did
That is because you did not bother to read the link I attached.
It is no contradiction, that is my personal thoughts.

They made that point across the Courts, HC, CoA, & SC.
It failed.

What the Courts said was that "pre-election time limits shouldn't be used to perpetrate illegality".

“It must be said that an illegal or prohibited act does not become legal by virtue of being time-barred,” the judge added.
This was Ekwo's reply, and this was upheld up till the SC.

Would this same barrister be wrong to file same case away from the pre-election window and quote this judgement?
That's the Contradiction, this time from the Courts, not from me.
Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by kahal29: 4:01am On Jul 09, 2020
fergie001:

That is because you did not bother to read the link I attached.
It is no contradiction, that is my personal thoughts.

They made that point across the Courts, HC, CoA, & SC.
It failed.

What the Courts said was that "pre-election time limits shouldn't be used to perpetrate illegality".

“It must be said that an illegal or prohibited act does not become legal by virtue of being time-barred,” the judge added.
This was Ekwo's reply, and this was upheld up till the SC.

Would this same barrister be wrong to file same case away from the pre-election window and quote this judgement?
That's the Contradiction, this time from the Courts, not from me.


My issue with this case is that..... Is it being filed as what? Pre - election or Post - election matter?

Asked this because the time for filing both pre and post election matters has elapsed and the issue being canvassed here is that APC has no candidate based on supreme court judgement on Uche Nwosu of which the supreme court said that it was a PRE ELECTION MATTER in their judgment declaring Uzodima as the duly elected Governor of Imo state...... And you know very well that the Supreme court cannot Double Speak on a matter they have clearly reffered to as pre-election matter which is bound by Section 285(9) of the Nigerian constitution.

Secondly Uche Nwosu & AP case came under Double nomination which I may say is first of its kind in recent times but this one is arguing that APC has no candidate in the election whereas there is a court judgement which has not been set aside till date saying it has a candidate in the person of Hope Uzodinma.

Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by Agboriotejoye(m): 8:32am On Jul 09, 2020
fergie001:

This NJC has issues.
We all know how Tanko became CJN...
The NBA President (himself a member of the NJC), is enmeshed in deep corruption waters.
Now you know...


Permit me as this might be long........
The APC Primaries was held on October 01, 2018.
Uche Nwosu CLAIMED he won the elections announced by his faction on October 06, 2018.
On October 09 2018, he sought an interim injunction compelling the Party to submit his name to INEC as the flagbearer for the 2019 elections. This plea was granted by Justice Valentine Ashi (now deceased) of the FCT High Court, Apo Division.
NOTE: Interim Injunctions aren't life-long.

Prince Madumere (Deputy Governor of Imo State), one of the Aspirants in the said Primaries had taken the case to Court in Suit No HOW/756/2018 at the Imo State High Court.
On Nov 21, 2018..Justice Kemakolam Ojiako upheld all prayers....
A. That the Party should send the name of the winner of the Primaries, Hope Uzodinma, as announced.

B. That the Primary elections was fair and free and barred the Party from submitting the name of any other candidate.
This case wasn't appealed by Nwosu till date.
https://www.vanguardngr.com/2018/11/madumere-floors-okorocha-again-in-court/amp/

FACTS
Due to the stiff opposition, he was offered the AA ticket, which he took.
Leonard Okolienta, an AA Chieftain had taken him to Court that he was the authentic flagbearer for AA, and not Nwosu.
He failed to show substantial proofs and rightly lost at the High, Appellate and Supreme Courts respectively, who upheld that Nwosu was the authentic candidate of the AA for the 2019 elections.

February 27, 2019....the APP and its Deputy National Chairman, Nnadi, had asked the Federal High Court, Abuja to interprete Section 37 of the Electoral Act 2010 (as amended). Section 37 surrounds penalties involved with multiple nominations when the person involved "knowingly" avails himself. (APC & Uzodinma weren't parties to the suit)

Justice Ekwo ruled that based on the order of October 9 wherein Nwosu CLAIMED he won the Primaries, Nwosu also took the AA ticket, without first showing cause for resignation from his former party, the APC.

WHAT WAS EKWO'S JUDGEMENT;

“An order of this honourable court is hereby made directing the 1st defendant (INEC) to remove the name of the 2nd defendant (Nwosu) as the governorship of the 3rd defendant (AA) in the 2019 Imo State governorship election for multiple nomination in violation of the provision of section 37 of the Electoral Act 2018 (as amended).

“An order of this honourable court is hereby made restraining the 1st defendant (INEC) from recognising the 2nd defendant (Nwosu) as the governorship of the 3rd defendant (AA) and/or any other political party for the 2019 Imo State governorship election.

“An order of this honourable court is hereby made restraining the 1st defendant (INEC) from giving value to any act done in pursuance of the 2nd defendant purported candidature of the 3rd defendant (AA) and/or any other political party in the 2019 Imo State governorship election”, the judge held.
https://businessday.ng/politics/article/court-sets-aside-nomination-of-uche-nwosu-as-governorship-candidate/amp/
The Appellate and Supreme Courts agreed with Ekwo's judgement.

This judgement didn't compel APC on anything. There was never a prayer wrt the APC or its candidate.
The SC in SC.1384/2019 didn't decide on who won the Primaries, neither did it authenticate NWOSU as flagbeàr but decided on the "double nomination" of Nwosu.

EVERY CASE IS A MERIT ON ITS OWN.

It based its judgement on Nwosu's CLAIM and not the "meat" involved with the authentic candidate(s) which had been decided on Nov 21, 2018 which wasn't appealed against.



Amaechi/Omehia case was correct at the time...2007.
Our Electoral Act at the time, saw the position as owned by the Party.

The amendment that came on in 2010 changed all of that.
Now you must go through all stages of the election or your Party loses out.

CONTRADICTIONS:
Section 285(9) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) was very clear that all pre-election cases should commence within 14 days after the cause of action (Party Primaries).
However, APP filed close to 4 months after Primaries had ended, yet, Justice Ekwo, dwelt on the legality and illegality of it.
His sentiments was also shared by the Appellate and Supreme Courts.

MY OWN THOUGHTS;
I just think the Courts, SC inclusive, were ambushed in this Imo case.


dansuqi ejimatic kahal29 agborojietoye

There's no ambush here, the courts ambushed themselves if you think it's an ambush. It's an obvious failing of our judicial system that happened in Imo which will take years to correct. The meat of the matter is actually binary and not complex as you seem to make it.
1. Uche Nwosu is the authentic candidate of the APC. He stands disqualified due to double nomination. Result: APC has no candidate.
2. Uche Nwosu is not the candidate of the APC but that of AA. He was eligible to contest the election under AA since APC did not recognise the primary that produced him. Result: Uzodinma won the election while Uche Nwosu came fourth.

Note that the primaries that produced Nwosu is different from that which produced Hope. Only one could have been authentic. So, if Hope's primaries was authentic, then Nwosu couldn't be accused of double nomination. If it was Nwosu's that was authentic as SC has ruled, then Hope cannot be governor. This matter is really simple. It's just the problem of our courts to contradict themselves that's been happening.

1 Like

Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by NaijadrivaCars: 10:09am On Jul 09, 2020
That group has a sound argument @seunmsg.
Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by Nobody: 10:28am On Jul 09, 2020
AllTheWayUp:
This is the cabal moving against Hope Uzodimma who seems to be pro Tinubu n Pro Oshiomole

ABBA KYARI who made this fraudulent judgement possible is now late and buried. There is every tendency that Hope Uzodinma may not find someone strong again to rewrite judgement at the supreme court. Useless country Nigeria

1 Like

Re: Fresh Legal Moves To Sack Hope Uzodinma Commences In Abuja by chukel(m): 11:28am On Jul 09, 2020
DOA

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (Reply)

Atiku In Secret Meetings With APC Stalwarts - Authorityngr.com / Aftermath Of Edo Assembly Complex Invasion By Hoodlums (Photos) / I Will Return Stronger To Rebuild PDP,Johnathan Tells Party Leadership

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 54
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.