Carlo Ancellotti may have won two CL cups but sometimes he still acts daft and goes about his tactics in a sadly predictable manner. He and he alone cost Chelsea the full points on Sunday at the Bridge.
1. He played Torres and Drogba together (Two incompatible players who needed more training together to have a chance of blending)
2. He sacrificed his wingers to accomodate the two strikers mentioned above and thus for a large part of the game Chelsea tried to play from the middle which was not their style and of course was difficult with Liverpool playing three central defenders
3. He left the changes too late when they had conceded. Should have made the changes earlier seeing how badly they were playing

http://soccerfiesta..com/2011/02/chelseas-ancellotti-and-his-school-boy.html

I completely agree . . .

that was my thought when i see the squad also.

1. playing forward of drogba and tores(should have been anelka and tores or drogba and anelka)
simples,anelka will have a better understanding with tores than drogba cos drogba is an out and out st just like tores while anelka can play the cf and cam positions cos he is one who passes the ball better than drogba
4312 was suicide to start with and liverpool had 5 mid,that was death waiting to happen

exactly he ought to adapt to whatever liverpool came with. he never needed to start Torres. Suarez was on the bench throughout because maybe he didn't fit in to what Kenny Dalglish wanted to play.

Nor mind the MOFO of a coach !