Mowoe:
People who do not support abortion(pro-lifers) only care about a baby before it's born; after you give birth they'll tell you to 'carry your cross,' and ask you why you'd give birth to a baby you cannot take care of.



SHIT HAPPENS!

FutureIsFemale:
I have modified it.

dhardline:


Exactly the same reason murder makes no sense even though people still commit it just like in this case. Abortion is Murder.

UDUJ:


Okay send it bro. No promises, but I will do my best.

Evangelynn:

Logically and scientifically abortion is not and can never be muder.Never you compare a human being with inalienable rights to a foetus/embryo because the person carrying such an embryo has full and exclusive rights to her body to decide how she sees fit not the embryo.

Abortion is not murder that is just the emotional religious blackmail we hear.

dhardline:


You can argue from now till tomorrow just to suit your hearts desire for it not to be, but we all know the baby is a seperate entity in the woman's body same reason when a person kills a pregnant woman he/she is charged with double homicide. So I'm wondering where your 'logically and scientific' claim comes from, when the law says otherwise.

Masterclass32:
If you are not ready, or cannot afford to be a parent, maybe due to financial limitations or whatever, then don't do the do.

kiddkash:

product of a whores lechery

FutureIsFemale:
I don't support abortion but if I find out that the man is not willing to take up the responsibility, I would abort.

Better to abort than to bring irresponsible souls to the world.

Cases of robbery, raping and other social vices done are done by children whose dad rejected their pregnancy.

Evangelynn:

If not for science a foetus or embryo will not survive without the woman carrying it so how can it be a human being when it cannot survive on its own.The charges of double homicide depend on the laws of the country it may or may not apply.Do you carry out census on the foetus,apply for scholarships or benefits for children on a foetus/embryo if your answer is no then you have no point.
My logical/scientific claim comes from research which I will advice you do,a foetus is not a human being and abortion where it is legal cannot be murder.Abortion is a choice and not a must.The topic of this thread is Texas which is in the united states where the supreme court in the case of Roe v Wade made abortion legal in the United States and it is a judicial precedent which must be followed.

FutureIsFemale:
I don't support abortion but if I find out that the man is not willing to take up the responsibility, I would abort.

Better to abort than to bring irresponsible souls to the world.

Cases of robbery, raping and other social vices done are done by children whose dad rejected their pregnancy.

Evangelynn:

If not for science a foetus or embryo will not survive without the woman carrying it so how can it be a human being when it cannot survive on its own.The charges of double homicide depend on the laws of the country it may or may not apply.Do you carry out census on the foetus,apply for scholarships or benefits for children on a foetus/embryo if your answer is no then you have no point.
My logical/scientific claim comes from research which I will advice you do,a foetus is not a human being and abortion where it is legal cannot be murder.Abortion is a choice and not a must.The topic of this thread is Texas which is in the united states where the supreme court in the case of Roe v Wade made abortion legal in the United States and it is a judicial precedent which must be followed.

GerogeI:


Your last phrase is an absolute lie.

For your point, instead of aborting another life, why not use condom ab initio. It's almost free or Take a drug to kill the sperm.
You leave all those options, then come six weeks later to kill the child.


If Texans do not want rampart abortion, why force them in the name of womens right. What about the rights of the baby?

GerogeI:


Jeeze what kind of idiot is this?

We cannot even understand a tenth of human brain, talkless of declaring at what stage it should be regarded as conscious. A foetus is not a human it's a tadpole according to clowns.

dhardline:


Since science also keeps those in a coma, who cannot survive on their own alive should we go ahead and not regard them as human beings! The charges of double homicide does apply fully in this very country and state we are talking about. So if a person cannot apply for scholarships or cannot be counted it therefore gives reason to not regard the person as a human being allowing him or her to be killed? Does this in anyway sound logical to you? Abortion is legal so it's not murder and yet slavery was once legal too. By now you should know that the laws men make should never be taken a final words. Roe VS wade made abortion legal and Taxas law makers are saying they want it illegal! Their state their laws.

Evangelynn:

Go and argue with science and next time don't insult me.

Nexton2468:
Oyibo fine Sha that one for middle

Evangelynn:

Have you heard of Euthanasia?Google it it answers your question on coma because it seems you have a problem grasping what choice means and see,also Roe V Wade made it the law of the land Texas law makers cannot supercede or overturn federal law and precedent which is why they will lose in court and it cannot stand unless the supreme court overrules itself and in this case it will be very hard to do.Since a foetus and embryo cannot apply for the aforementioned it is not a human being that is the logic I am trying to pass across or why don't you add an embryo to a census and give it an identity or better still name it while yet unborn .Thankfully slavery is now illegal and abortion will never be,the legality or illegality of abortion doesn't stop back alley abortions from happening till date

FutureIsFemale:
I don't support abortion but if I find out that the man is not willing to take up the responsibility, I would abort.

Better to abort than to bring irresponsible souls to the world.

Cases of robbery, raping and other social vices done are done by children whose dad rejected their pregnancy.

GerogeI:


Which science are you talking about? Psuedo Scientist
Make clear distinction between science and popular rumours. As of today, science cannot even clearly and absolutely define the colour red, talkless of a human being.

Do you even know the difference between a theory, a law and absolute truth?

GerogeI:


Neither can your baby or 4 year old apply for any of your aforementioned. You have always done it for them. Your parents did all your applications in your behalf. Your selective logic is not only childish, but downright stupid.

GerogeI:


Neither can your baby or 4 year old apply for any of your aforementioned. You have always done it for them. Your parents did all your applications on your behalf. Your selective logic is not only childish, but downright stupid.

In case you are not aware, you are fighting the concept of Human Transcendence. The single most important factor why any and all progress humans have made on this earth was ever achieved. In layman's terms you call it hope. Hope of a Generation that their ofsprings grows into a profitable humans. And it does not start after they are born, no. For carefully planners it starts before conception, for accidental parents it starts from the foetus or your none human tadpole. Never again standup to tell people what is and what is not human, because in that moment you will be mocking the parents that concieved and gave birth to you.

Evangelynn:


Lol abortion isn't murder and a foetus isn't a human being technically,children are born by parents who prepare and choose to have them so bye bye

FutureIsFemale:
I don't support abortion but if I find out that the man is not willing to take up the responsibility, I would abort.

Better to abort than to bring irresponsible souls to the world.

Cases of robbery, raping and other social vices done are done by children whose dad rejected their pregnancy.

Evangelynn:

How exactly does this concern me
Lol,in a bid to sound smart you miss the point when a child is born isn't it obvious that the parents made a choice of wanting to keep it and decide for it until it reaches the age of consent,which is why the parent is a guardian,a foetus/embryo doesn't get this benefit neither is the benefit open to a foetus/embryo.You are the one with selective logic since you couldn't see the point I was driving at,is the application for children open for an unborn yes or no?that was the point and next time try not to insult me again

Evangelynn:

Have you heard of Euthanasia?Google it it answers your question on coma because it seems you have a problem grasping what choice means and see,also Roe V Wade made it the law of the land Texas law makers cannot supercede or overturn federal law and precedent which is why they will lose in court and it cannot stand unless the supreme court overrules itself and in this case it will be very hard to do.Since a foetus and embryo cannot apply for the aforementioned it is not a human being that is the logic I am trying to pass across or why don't you add an embryo to a census and give it an identity or better still name it while yet unborn .Thankfully slavery is now illegal and abortion will never be,the legality or illegality of abortion doesn't stop back alley abortions from happening till date

CXLVII:


That’s 1 in 1 million


Go the street of South Chicago, California, Alabama, Arizona and Alaska, Over 90 percent of those gang boys are from unwanted homes.

BabaIbo:


Yes "dull" because they think people don't know they are the ones orchestrating it.

So, you think that is smartness?

GerogeI:


Jeeze what kind of idiot is this?

We cannot even understand a tenth of human brain, talkless of declaring at what stage it should be regarded as conscious. A foetus is not a human it's a tadpole according to clowns.

dhardline:


The same Euthanasia is equally illegal in the US that's what you fail to understand. It's a thing, yes; but it's illegal because it's murder

How hard is it to grasp this things! Abortion will never be illegal and yet you talk about back alley abortions

Let me try and make it easy for you to understand. When the government makes a law it does not mean some people will not break that law what it simply means is if you are caught then you'll bear the brunt

And on religious grounds its taking the life of another person( A seperate and distinct person) who was looking forward to living life to the fullest but you took laws into your own hands and choose that he/she would amount to nothing. Shalom.