jmaine:

Manure United is a great football club no doubt and arguably the best in England if the Liverpool fans will like to accent that fact  . . . But you also need to say the truth the way it is . .Arse-anal played better than Manure against Barca dating way back to 2006 final even with Barca a man -down syndrome

texazzpete:

As I recall, Arsenal lost that game.

Also, the Ref cheated for Arsenal. Where do you disallow a valid goal to give a red card and a free kick?!


@Topic
This is hilarious so now all Arsenal fans have to cling on to is that they were the 'better losers'?

It is more shameful to lose a Carling cup final to lowly Birmingham when you haven't won anything for 6 years than to lose to the best footballing side ever (Barca)

snowdrops:

when did they draw

afam4eva:

Both Arsenal and ManU are losers. They should both focus on the premiership where they face clubs like Wigan , Sunderland etc. Local champs.

If only the latter (Manure) can replicate their ability in England  to have a hold on center referees like the Catalonia team have in Europe    . . then they would be dominating the European stage as often as possible . .even without that . .the Manure team is still a great side in Europe no doubt . .Just that their trend of self destructing in Finals against Barca is sour . . They appear to suddenly feel they are very inferior which i doubt considering Manure tanacity when they are up for it . . . Well, who won't be fair to pay respect to this great Barca side when you meet them . . . They make football look so incredibly cheap and very annoying to opposing team members  . .They make you run futile errands on the pitch on a constant basis  without rest 

tunnytox:

Look dude I'm not into in Arsene we trust bull shhhht I believe Arsenal deserve to have been very successful especially in the last 6 years and i also believe Wenger has a lot to answer for why this is not so.
BTW Man utd success does come at a price and judging by the fact that Arsenal hasn't spend so much the 4th positin they achieve may not be bad after all.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1391980/Manchester-United-478m-debt-afford-let-Sir-Alex-spend-spend-spend.html

benlay:

I won't not praise a team that spend less and finish 4th position all the time, just saying, the market is open for everybody to get the players they think will give 'em success. Fourth is not bad afterall that was a joke of the year.

baby-boy:

arsenal didnt have a shot at goal

Can Barcelona do that to Vasco Da Gama, Corinthians or Flamengo or even Atletico Mineiro

martinosi:

^^^^^^^^^^

Becos European Teams are intimidated by Barcelona,

Can Barcelona do that to Vasco Da Gama, Corinthians or Flamengo or even Atletico Mineiro

NO WHY!!!,

Internacional of Brazill made Barcelona Look like Kids in their Friendly Match,

benlay:

I won't praise a team that spend less and finish 4th position all the time, just saying, the market is open for everybody to get the players they think will give 'em success. Fourth is not bad afterall that was a joke of the year.

tunnytox:

How is that a joke? you seem to be reading my post upside down, no one is asking you to praise any team the bottom line is you reap what you sow. Arsenal invest less and they achieved less than United how is that unexpected? However, the thread is really about the 2 teams performances against Barca and as far as I can see Arsenal performed better. Some people claimed they have no shot at goal well that's not the issue its all about the fact that at least they won the first leg, while Barca was only able to score more goals only after Arsenal has been reduced to 10 men. Performances is not only judged by the amount of shot at goal you have but more importantly how much goal you scored and fewer goals conceeded.