Malami abi milimi is the worste AGF to have ever held this position since the inception of Nigeria!

He defends criminals so long as they're northerners!

Desperation
Resign to contest

Malami is the devil's elder brother, but Tinubu using his toy boy Gbajabiamila to enact stupid laws that benefit him is what the pope ordained.
Una never see anything yet.

Laggafin:
Lol.. but e go choke malami.. he has just nailed his governorship ambition and will never be Govnor.. this Karma dat is coming has short fuse and lacks patience

Well,he is very much interested in nailing Tinubu's lifetime ambitions

Which means any other law which does not Suit who ever is Power, can be changed by just deleting and rewriting.

And there are So many of them.
PIB
FOI
Anti grazing bills
EFCC act
etc

Once the act doesn't favour you, just delete.

Zoo.

00FFT00:
Malami is the devil's elder brother, but Tinubu using his toy boy Gbajabiamila to enact stupid laws that benefit him is what the pope ordained.
Una never see anything yet.

The only wise comment. Any law that Buhari perceive to be for Tinubu's interest will always be thwarted. Tinubu will understand better soon

Brendaniel:
Is this possible? I don't think so, how would lawmakers make a law and then a court now amends the law and the attorney general now says he has implemented it, so what is now the use of the lawmakers in the first place...

Secondly: this case was just filed a few days ago, how did they get speedy judgement on it, yet the tax case btw states and FG dragged for a long time, Nigeria has never had it this bad in law, what Malami just did does not hold waters, the supreme court will throw it out(except the supreme court is compromised)...

Malami has turned to a lawmaker...

Just few days ago o.

No adjournment for further hearing, kangaroo justice system. Who is the defendant and who is the complainant??
Best leader attracts best of allies who will work with him in his cabinet. Buhari attract his kinds no doubt.
Malami has become both pencil and eraser of the law all by himself.

Impunity at its peak, only under Buhari

So...I expect a Cold war between the executive and legislative arm to kick off any moment...

Wasted effort, if him like tell the printer to rush and print, the appeal court will order a stay pending the determination of the court case and it will be served on INEC and the political parties. Na the printer go still reprint the original version. Abokii lawyer

ityP:




Well,he is very much interested in nailing Tinubu's lifetime ambitions

Lol.. e choke on all fronts

Useless and dead country.

1 and 2nd reading plus Presidential assent is equal to Malami plus Kangaroo Judge..

No time

Mallami's interest just prevailed against the interest of NASS. This bastardization of strength of the Legislative.

pquaver:


Oga small sense for this thing no for bad.. There are 3 arms of government..
1 Legislators - makes the law
2 Judiciary - interpreters of the law
3 executive - executes the law...
Small social studies bro, this 1 no need university degree to understand na.
The legislative has made a law which has been interpreted by the judiciary to have infringed on the constitution with a recommendation to excuteive to delete, which has been carried out.. Again abeg how e take confuse u abeg.. Or u just want to wail. The law is law of d politicians by d politicians for d politicians.. Abeg u dey contest...

The constitution is clear on how a law shall be amended..

I expect that the NJC effectively retires that Judge.

fergie001:


SOURCE


PREVIOUS THREAD:
https://www.nairaland.com/7035755/federal-high-court-allows-sitting

See how Malami is laughing at NASs

Proflere:
So, I entered FIRS the other day see three pictures on the wall: Mr President, Finance minister and the Firs Chairman.. Na there I know say " we are done for".

All Hausa Fulani I suppose?

Agbegbaorogboye:

See how Malami is laughing at NASs

chloride6:


The constitution is clear on how a law shall be amended..

I expect that the NJC effectively retires that Judge.

Stop showing your ignorance, go & peruse section 315(3) of the Constitution of 1999 as Amended, & you would realize how oblivious you really are.

Brendaniel:
Is this possible? I don't think so, how would lawmakers make a law and then a court now amends the law and the attorney general now says he has implemented it, so what is now the use of the lawmakers in the first place...

Secondly: this case was just filed a few days ago, how did they get speedy judgement on it, yet the tax case btw states and FG dragged for a long time, Nigeria has never had it this bad in law, what Malami just did does not hold waters, the supreme court will throw it out(except the supreme court is compromised)...

Malami has turned to a lawmaker...

My problem is that most of us are on this forum celebrating Mr Malami. Forgetting that what he just did is opening the pandora box.

If the court can give such a kangaroo order for a law passed by the legislative process and accented by the president, then we are doom. Tomorrow, of course nobody stays in power forever, another Attorney General will do the same on any law he feels he not ok with. This is because Mr Malami has sent a precedent.

For those saying that the amended electoral law is not in tune with the constitution of the land, that's a fallacy because the law do not stop anyone from voting and be voted for, but for political appointees, you must resign to create a level playing field for everyone. That's fairness and justice.

Coming days will be interesting, politically, economically etc

The youth, the leaders of tomorrow were are we in all these??

Michelle70:
Why them no go delete am?
Na because e favour them na.

why don't you want it deleted?

Is not deleting it solve the huge problems of this country?

Law markers are supposed to be making good laws but instead they choose to witch hunt others. This is what happens when you vote stupid people to the senate and house of reps.

They don't know their duties and responsibilities as law makers.

pquaver:


Oga small sense for this thing no for bad.. There are 3 arms of government..
1 Legislators - makes the law
2 Judiciary - interpreters of the law
3 executive - executes the law...
Small social studies bro, this 1 no need university degree to understand na.
The legislative has made a law which has been interpreted by the judiciary to have infringed on the constitution with a recommendation to excuteive to delete, which has been carried out.. Again abeg how e take confuse u abeg.. Or u just want to wail. The law is law of d politicians by d politicians for d politicians.. Abeg u dey contest...

Do you know what you are saying, I don't think so, to delete something means to make change and not interpret, to interpret is to explain for better understanding, that is not what happened here, deleting is to remove something which was legislated upon in the constitution, no court not even the supreme court has the power to delete any part of the constitution made by the legislative arm, if they can add or remove any part of the constitution then they have made themselves law makers too, which is not under their jurisdiction, that is why till today no region can sue the FG to court asking for a referendum because the constitution does not support it, no court can add it, only the law makers can do that, so please know what you are saying, what happened here is judicial rascality...

anyilalaz:


My problem is that most of us are on this forum celebrating Mr Malami. Forgetting that what he just did is opening the pandora box.

If the court can give such a kangaroo order for a law passed by the legislative process and accented by the president, then we are doom. Tomorrow, of course nobody stays in power forever, another Attorney General will do the same on any law he feels he not ok with. This is because Mr Malami has sent a precedent.

For those saying that the amended electoral law is not in tune with the constitution of the land, that's a fallacy because the law do not stop anyone from voting and be voted for, but for political appointees, you must resign to create a level playing field for everyone. That's fairness and justice.

Coming days will be interesting, politically, economically etc

The youth, the leaders of tomorrow were are we in all these??

Section 315 (3) of The Constitution of 1999 As Amended gives the power to a High Court to invalidate any existing law not consistent with the provisions of the Constitution ie. The Electoral Act.

Brendaniel:


Do you know what you are saying, I don't think so, to delete something means to make change and not interpret, to interpret is to explain for better understanding, that is not what happened here, deleting is to remove something which was legislated upon in the constitution, no court not even the supreme court has the power to delete any part of the constitution made by the legislative arm, if they can add or remove any part of the constitution then they have made themselves law makers too, which is not under their jurisdiction, that is why till today no region can sue the FG to court asking for a referendum because the constitution does not support it, no court can add it, only the law makers can do that, so please know what you are saying, what happened here is judicial rascality...

Nonsense.

Andyg:
D lawmakers makes law while d judiciary interpreate it. Why did d lawmakers approaches court 4 lnterpretiation of law?

Do you know what you are saying, I don't think so, to delete something means to make change and not interpret, to interpret is to explain for better understanding, that is not what happened here, deleting is to remove something which was legislated upon in the constitution, no court not even the supreme court has the power to delete any part of the constitution made by the legislative arm, if they can add or remove any part of the constitution then they have made themselves law makers too, which is not under their jurisdiction, that is why till today no region can sue the FG to court asking for a referendum because the constitution does not support it, no court can add it, only the law makers can do that, so please know what you are saying, what happened here is judicial rascality...

fergie001:


SOURCE


PREVIOUS THREAD:
https://www.nairaland.com/7035755/federal-high-court-allows-sitting

Malami shouldn't be allowed to do that. It looks suspicious

buckeyemedia:
Nonsense.

I'm not surprised you call it nonsense Because it's the truth...

Brendaniel:


I'm not surprised you call it nonsense Because it's the truth...

Ignorance is no excuse in law, please go & read the constitution of Nigeria, peruse section 315 (3) diligently.

buckeyemedia:
Ignorance is no excuse in law, please go & read the constitution of Nigeria, peruse section 315 (3) diligently.

Do you know what you are saying, I don't think so, to delete something means to make change and not interpret, to interpret is to explain for better understanding, that is not what happened here, deleting is to remove something which was legislated upon in the constitution, no court not even the supreme court has the power to delete any part of the constitution made by the legislative arm, if they can add or remove any part of the constitution then they have made themselves law makers too, which is not under their jurisdiction, that is why till today no region can sue the FG to court asking for a referendum because the constitution does not support it, no court can add it, only the law makers can do that, so please know what you are saying, what happened here is judicial rascality...

It is obvious this is the worst AGF in the history of this country. Same AGF that does not care about court orders, hastens to effect this one since it favours him. smh

buckeyemedia:
Stop showing your ignorance, go & peruse section 315(3) of the Constitution of 1999 as Amended, & you would realize how oblivious you really are.

We know your kind, you can never speak without insult. I will not reply you and your kith again.

Good day.