I feel obligated to address Pastor Suleimans unfortunate diatribe, if only for posterity sake.
I wouldn't have felt much need to debunk these lies had they not also been spread from the most unlikely quarters - the educated, and even by mainstream media.
This is only a part of a very dangerous new trend of targeted hostile messaging against a particular section of the Nigerian populace that now also emanates from pulpits and Oba's palaces, deepening existing fault lines of religious and ethnic hate and bigotry. It is now a common trend for anyone who wakes up on the wrong side of his bed to pick on Igbos. All decency and caution have been thrown to the winds. Akin only to xenophobia, this is becoming an alarming trend.
If this kind of messaging were just being propagated by illiterates and certified idiots as usual, I wouldn't be much bothered. But, alas it is also gaining prominency among those we would otherwise have considered enlightened.
I mean, how do you blame a zone with 15 out of 109 Senators for the high turnover of Senate Presidents during the Obasanjo era. Does that even make sense to you? Indeed, out of the 15 only 14 were regular voting senators because 1 was the Senate President. The people who spread these pedestrian tales by moonlight cannot tell you any important role that South East people played in these persons removal. Yet, they keep peddling the falsehood.
How would you allege that it was the disunity of South East that got the 5 Senate Presidents out, except you are determined to do violence to facts and rape common sense?
First, the zone has the least number of senators of all geopolitical zones in Nigeria and so can hardly ever influence the selection or, removal of anyone, or indeed decide any direction for the House.
Secondly, out of the 5 Senate Presidents of that era, only 2 were impeached. Anyim and Nnamani served out their terms. Wabara resigned after the early morning broadcast by Obasanjo in which he alleged Wabara's involvement in "cash for budget". So the only 2 impeached were Okadigbo and Enwerem.
If you ever bothered to read Obasanjos book "MY WATCH" you will know that the removal of those Senate Presidents was a product of the political supremacy battle between Atiku and Obasanjo. Obasanjo wrote it in no uncertain terms that his battle for political space led to the manipulations, scheming, and shenanigans that consumed the political fortunes of those men. Money was regularly shared and the 109 house did their bit, upon the helplessness of the South East.
What those who spread these tales are doing is similar to where an adult farts and turns around to blame an innocent child seated nearby. So, even where the South East hasn't been disunited, some people still find a way of smuggling in the word "disunity" just because they must give a dog a bad name in order to seem justified in hanging it.
You would note of course that in the same era the position of PDP Chairmanship also witnessed a similar high turnover of occupants of that office - 6 Chairmen in 8 years !!! The Speakership of the House of Representatives zoned to North West also witnessed a similar turnover - 3 Speakers in those years. From Salisu Buhari (who was exposed by his own step mother and forced to resign by the northern majority in the House of Representatives) to Ghali Umar Naaba (who wasn't allowed to return to the House) to Aminu Bello Masari
It was all due to the fight between two gladiators, Obasanjo and Atiku. These two other important positions weren't being occupied by the South East. Yet, no one talks about those as disunity of the people that occupied the positions.
If you look at our recent political history you will see where persons from other zones fought each other to a standstill whether politically or otherwise. Yet no one makes a topic of "them vs them", because it is just seen as politics. I can cite several examples but I'll hold my brakes for now.
I am therefore at a loss why some people keep peddling these lies against Igbos and why they are still believed by some persons.
Ordinarily, political contestation should be a given in a democracy and it doesn't matter that the contestants share the same ethnicity, and we have seen this play out several times among persons of other ethnic groups, without stereotypes being created about them. But it seems that Igbos have even been denied such right in Nigeria, that anytime they have a different opinion from one another then it is a product of their disunity.
How can we build a nation when lies become more important than truths? How can we build a nation when you must find a reason to blame and castigate a part for what is not any of their fault? Why are some people bent on pushing this false stereotype of disunity, if not that they stand to gain from such disunity?
You say Igbo are not united because some apprentices steal from their oga, yet you forgot that the Igbo apprenticeship system has been the most successful job creation and entrepreneurship building platform. Would it have been that successful if what you mentioned was so rampant?
Is there any ethnic group in the world without good and bad people? Shouldn't it have been taken as normal that such a vast scheme that takes in millions of new entrants annually will also have some deviants?
How do you accuse the same people that through sheer creativity evolved their own unique structure which they have used to help one another grow from the ashes of a devastating war to a vastly successful people, of disunity ?
Why this constant attempt to gaslight and demonise a section of this country? Why has hate speech become normal and acceptable in Nigeria whenever it is directed at Igbos ?
Nigeria is walking a dangerous slope with acceptance of this anomally as normality
This is the time for all and especially prominent Nigerians involved in this to apply caution.

By Jimmy Abia
culled from his Facebook wall

cc: Lalasticlala, I wish you can push this article to frontpage, so as to balance views regarding Igbo disunity as widely believed.

Hmm