lexy2014:


You haven't answered my questions:

Has he not been stagnant?So what if he scored goal of the season? So u mean that best player award is usually given to players who score goal of the season?

Trying hard to box your argument into goals yea?

We judge performance all through the season, kindly tell me one thing that Kelvin did better than Mo all season.

Don’t try to be clever by asking irrelevant question. No player is expected to perform wonders every day all through the season.

Iretii0511:



Trying hard to box your argument into goals yea?

We judge performance all through the season, kindly tell me one thing that Kelvin did better than Mo all season.

Don’t try to be clever by asking irrelevant question. No player is expected to perform wonders every day all through the season.

Still doesn't answer my questions:

Has he not been stagnant?So what if he scored goal of the season? So u mean that best player award is usually given to players who score goal of the season?

AAA593:

U need help

Dude, I apologized, WTF with the insults man

lexy2014:


Still doesn't answer my questions:

Has he not been stagnant?So what if he scored goal of the season? So u mean that best player award is usually given to players who score goal of the season?

Repeating this nonsense you call question doesn’t in anyway makes your argument smart. Mention where I said the players should be rated by goals only, or that he should have won the award because of his number of goals, that’s when your question can make sense.

As for being stagnant, was Kelvin not stagnant for up to half of the season?

We are talking about their performance season wide not second half of the season unless you mean a player should only be judged by his performance for the second half of the season.

I remember the first time I watched this guy play.

I asked, who's this guy?

He puts his whole soulf and energy into each game, and consistently so.
He's never changed nor waned.

He reminds me so much of Peter Obi.

Iretii0511:


Repeating this nonsense you call question doesn’t in anyway makes your argument smart. Mention where I said the players should be rated by goals only, or that he should have won the award because of his number of goals, that’s when your question can make sense.

As for being stagnant, was Kelvin not stagnant for up to half of the season?

We are talking about their performance season wide not second half of the season unless you mean a player should only be judged by his performance for the second half of the season.

Still far from answering my questions:

Has he not been stagnant?So what if he scored goal of the season? So u mean that best player award is usually given to players who score goal of the season?

Iretii0511:
Salah deserved this by all standard. Highest goal scorer, highest assist.


This is daylight robbery. Football awards are becoming useless these days honestly.

It's their usual politics.

Mustiboy:


As far as stats go, KDB is far (emphasis on far) better than Modric. Common, KDB even has 65% better stats than almighty Ozil.

Modric has only has a more arguably successful than KDB, in terms of trophies.

Modric has more trophy winning stats .... what else?

I mean international too ...not just domestic trophies.....+ a world cup silver medal.

Mustiboy:


As far as stats go, KDB is far (emphasis on far) better than Modric. Common, KDB even has 65% better stats than almighty Ozil.

Modric has only has a more arguably successful than KDB, in terms of trophies.

No need of dragging this too much.
Modric is simply ahead and should not be mention in same sentence.

Well deserved

thesicilian:
Should have been Salah or mane

no be by goals. KDB na "link up" player

I drop cap

Well deserved.

The Top 10 Greatest Goalkeepers Of All Time
https://www.footballorbit.com/the-top-10-greatest-goalkeepers-of-all-time/#more