A CLOSER LOOK AT MIKE IGINI'S ACCLAIMED INTEGRITY.

How can a lawyer defy a court order, question the judgment of a court of law outside appeal window, mislead ignorant Nigerians with fraudulent interpretation of the import of status quo order; recognizes a candidate whose parallel primary was not conducted by the national headquarters of the political party as the law clearly says?

What type of integrity is that? A man who's utterances INEC his employers have renounced? For instance, he claimed there was no APC primary for Eket Federal Constituency just because it was conducted by Ntukekpo. Yet Eseme Eyibo's name was published by INEC who emerged from the Ntukekpo led primary.

He claimed that the Stephen Ntukekpo led executive is illegal and had no power to conduct primaries but that of Austin Ekanem is the lawful exco, thereby defying subsisting court order. See copy of court order above

Yet INEC published the names of all candidates filed by Ntukekpo except Akpabio. Not even one person filed by Austin Ekanem has been accepted by INEC. Yet Mike Igini keeps shouting in the media that what he says is INEC's position.

Yet it was only the temporary suspension of the publication of Akpabio's name by INEC that people went online declaring that Mike Igini is right.

Does Mike Igini's conduct above really show an unbiased umpire? Is his conduct not suggestive of working for certain political interests in a matter he is expected to be neutral? If he is working for certain interest in breach of his oath of impartiality, is he doing it for free?

*Copied

Two02:

Seun

ok

CleanInAll:
ok

Cc lalasticlala
Mydd44

Mike Igini is squeezing life out of Akpabio's political scrotum.