HIGHLIGHTING THE ERRORS IN THE OSUN TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN'S VERDICT BY HASHIM ABIOYE ESQ.


1. NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE BVAS MACHINES BUT WITH THE INEC SERVER AS AGAINST THE ERRONEOUS HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.

2. ACCREDITATION WAS BY BVAS MACHINES CONCURRENTLY WITH THE VOTERS' REGISTERS. BVAS MACHINES, VOTERS REGISTER AND THE FORMS WERE WHAT WERE USED TO CONDUCT AND DECLARE ELECTION RESULTS, NOT THE SERVER WHICH THE APC RELIED UPON AND UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PREMISED HIS VERDICT.

3. INTRODUCTION OF BVAS HAS NOT REMOVED VOTERS REGISTER AS AGAINST THE HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.

4. DIRECT INFORMATION FROM BVAS MACHINES CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH THE INFORMATION FROM THE SERVER WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY NETWORK.

5. OYETOLA'S PETITION WAS DETERMINED UPON THE BVAS REPORT FROM SERVER NOT UPON THE PHYSICAL INFORMATION ON THE BVAS MACHINES WHICH HAS NOT CHANGED SINCE THE DAY AND TIME OF THE ELECTION.

6. BVAS MACHINE IS DIFFERENT FROM SERVER REPORT. BVAS IS THE DIRECT PRIMARY SOURCE, WHILE SERVER IS NOT, AS AGAINST THE VERDICT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TRIBUNAL.

7. BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN ELECTION WERE IN EVIDENCE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, THE INFORMATION ON THEM TALLIES WITH THE FORMS EC8A, THEREFORE NO DISCREPANCIES AS AGAINST THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL.

8. SERVER CREATED DISCREPANCIES BY PRODUCING TWO DIFFERENT BVAS REPORTS, BUT THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES PRODUCED ONLY ONE WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN JETTISONED.

9. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PICKED THE SERVER REPORT WHICH THE PETITIONERS SERVED AS THE PILLAR OF THEIR CASE, ABANDONED THE LATER SERVER REPORT. THE TRIBUNAL EQUALLY CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES AND THE FORMS EC8As THAT WERE PHYSICALLY BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL.

10. THE TRIBUNAL WAGED A WAR AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE DIRECT DATA EXTRACTED FROM THEM, WHEN INDEED THE WAR SHOULD BE AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL BVAS REPORTS.

11. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN GRANTED AN ORDER FOR PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF THE BVAS MACHINES, YET CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE REPORT OF THE SAID PHYSICAL INSPECTION INCLUDING THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES.

12. THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES, AND THE REPORT OF PHYSICAL INSPECTION DID NOT ESTABLISH OVER-VOTING AT ALL, BUT THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN WENT ON TO HOLD OVER-VOTING ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT.

13. NIGERIANS AND THE WORLD SHOULD KNOW THAT THE DOCUMENT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN HELD TO BE FORGERY WAS THE SAME DOCUMENT IN RESPECT OF WHICH THE SUPERIOR COURT OF APPEAL HAS VINDICATED ADELEKE, SINCE THERE WAS EVIDENCE THAT HE ATTENDED EDE MUSLIM GRAMMAR SCHOOL AND SAT FOR WAEC. THE TRIBUNAL FAILED TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE SAID JUDGMENT WHICH CLEARED ADELEKE OF FORGERY.

14. NO NECO RESULT WAS CONTAINED IN ALL THE DOCUMENTS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AS FALSELY BEING PEDDLED BY THE APC AND THEIR PROPAGANDISTS.

15. THE WHOLE WORLD SHOULD RISE TO DEFEND THE BVAS MACHINES AS AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL SERVER REPORTS UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN BASED HIS JUDGMENT.

16. THE APC PROPAGANDISTS AND MERCINARIES ARE HOLDING ON TO BIG LIES, A BASELESS REPORT TO TOPPLE A VALIDLY ELECTED GOVERNOR.

17. THE WORLD SHOULD BE TOLD THAT BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN 2022 GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION HAD NO PROBLEM, NO OVER-VOTING, BUT A SERVER REPORT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN ERRONEOUSLY RELIED UPON.

18. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN LACKED JURISDICTION BY VIRTUE OF SECTION 51(1),(2),(3) & (4) OF THE ELECTORAL ACT, 2022, TO DECLARE OYETOLA THE WINNER AFTER CANCELLING VOTES OF THE PARTIES ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT, EVEN THOUGH THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE FORMS EC8As TENDERED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL DID NOT ESTABLISH SUCH.

- Compiled by Hashim Abioye Esq.

https://www.facebook.com/100028527937018/posts/pfbid02MqVzVaWGp2TAvYJdz2dhGKiLGL8JiwuZ81Lkn5a59wfHxBarqy5RajkH4MVye8DYl/?app=fbl

Let Abioye represent Adeleke in court.

The wish of Osun people should be respected and shouldn't be tampered with, an attempt to dubiously or fraudulently upturn the choice of the people will boomerang.

Event of 14/4/2007 in Osun and reactions of the people statewide on 15/4/2007 still linger!

Cc mynd44 cc Seun cc OAM4j cc lalasticlala cc nlfpmod cc Dominique cc fergie001 FP

Observing

There is no way any sane person will tell me that Adeleke was not voted by majority of the Osun state electorate. But as usual, bullion van bandits have done it again just like Imo state. Nigeria judges have no fear of God...

Until this evil people who miscarry justice start experiencing attacks from the masses just like endsars, this criminals won't change

The day uzodonma was declared governor by supreme court, against will of masses who voted pdp is the day peace ended in once peaceful IMO state

The tribunal's verdict is an exercise in futility.

I don't need to over-flog it.

Supreme Court will clear Adeleke

Creamypie:
The day uzodonma was declared governor by supreme court, against will of masses who voted him is the day peace ended in once peaceful IMO state

yes soo. Bad ruling from the Supreme Court of justice . The so called then CJN and other justices that sat on that case are no where to be found today. Almost have retired.

Creamypie:
The day uzodonma was declared governor by supreme court, against will of masses who voted him is the day peace ended in once peaceful IMO state

And that is responsible for ongoing anarchy in the state

fergie001:
I don't need to over-flog it.

wow nice response from barrister fergie001.

slivertongue:
Supreme Court will clear Adeleke

yes soo. Supreme Court of justice will affirmed his victories in the July 16th, 2022 governorship poll

Chairman don mess up.

Cc Seun cc nlfpmod cc lalasticlala, kindly move this post to nairaland front page, let Nigerians analyse it critically but if you are not doing that I’m leaving nairaland for the next 4 months till Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice decide on the case.

Who is Hashim Abioye ?

Cc justwise cc fynestboi cc Seun Fp, kindly move this posts to front page. These highlights is highly detailed and enable everyone to understand the majority judgement of Osun State governorship tribunal.

YeeboMuslim:
Who is Hashim Abioye ?

check google about him.

psucc:
Chairman don mess up.

Infact NJC will sack him on the black market judgement he read last week.

press9jatv:
check google about him.

.

press9jatv:
HIGHLIGHTING THE ERRORS IN THE OSUN TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN'S VERDICT BY HASHIM ABIOYE ESQ.


1. NOTHING WAS WRONG WITH THE BVAS MACHINES BUT WITH THE INEC SERVER AS AGAINST THE ERRONEOUS HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.

2. ACCREDITATION WAS BY BVAS MACHINES CONCURRENTLY WITH THE VOTERS' REGISTERS. BVAS MACHINES, VOTERS REGISTER AND THE FORMS WERE WHAT WERE USED TO CONDUCT AND DECLARE ELECTION RESULTS, NOT THE SERVER WHICH THE APC RELIED UPON AND UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PREMISED HIS VERDICT.

3. INTRODUCTION OF BVAS HAS NOT REMOVED VOTERS REGISTER AS AGAINST THE HOLDING OF THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN.

4. DIRECT INFORMATION FROM BVAS MACHINES CANNOT BE EQUATED WITH THE INFORMATION FROM THE SERVER WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY NETWORK.

5. OYETOLA'S PETITION WAS DETERMINED UPON THE BVAS REPORT FROM SERVER NOT UPON THE PHYSICAL INFORMATION ON THE BVAS MACHINES WHICH HAS NOT CHANGED SINCE THE DAY AND TIME OF THE ELECTION.

6. BVAS MACHINE IS DIFFERENT FROM SERVER REPORT. BVAS IS THE DIRECT PRIMARY SOURCE, WHILE SERVER IS NOT, AS AGAINST THE VERDICT OF THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TRIBUNAL.

7. BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN ELECTION WERE IN EVIDENCE BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, THE INFORMATION ON THEM TALLIES WITH THE FORMS EC8A, THEREFORE NO DISCREPANCIES AS AGAINST THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL.

8. SERVER CREATED DISCREPANCIES BY PRODUCING TWO DIFFERENT BVAS REPORTS, BUT THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES PRODUCED ONLY ONE WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN JETTISONED.

9. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN PICKED THE SERVER REPORT WHICH THE PETITIONERS SERVED AS THE PILLAR OF THEIR CASE, ABANDONED THE LATER SERVER REPORT. THE TRIBUNAL EQUALLY CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES AND THE FORMS EC8As THAT WERE PHYSICALLY BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL.

10. THE TRIBUNAL WAGED A WAR AGAINST THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE DIRECT DATA EXTRACTED FROM THEM, WHEN INDEED THE WAR SHOULD BE AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL BVAS REPORTS.

11. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN GRANTED AN ORDER FOR PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF THE BVAS MACHINES, YET CLOSED ITS EYES AGAINST THE REPORT OF THE SAID PHYSICAL INSPECTION INCLUDING THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES.

12. THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES, AND THE REPORT OF PHYSICAL INSPECTION DID NOT ESTABLISH OVER-VOTING AT ALL, BUT THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN WENT ON TO HOLD OVER-VOTING ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT.

13. NIGERIANS AND THE WORLD SHOULD KNOW THAT THE DOCUMENT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN HELD TO BE FORGERY WAS THE SAME DOCUMENT IN RESPECT OF WHICH THE SUPERIOR COURT OF APPEAL HAS VINDICATED ADELEKE, SINCE THERE WAS EVIDENCE THAT HE ATTENDED EDE MUSLIM GRAMMAR SCHOOL AND SAT FOR WAEC. THE TRIBUNAL FAILED TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF THE SAID JUDGMENT WHICH CLEARED ADELEKE OF FORGERY.

14. NO NECO RESULT WAS CONTAINED IN ALL THE DOCUMENTS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AS FALSELY BEING PEDDLED BY THE APC AND THEIR PROPAGANDISTS.

15. THE WHOLE WORLD SHOULD RISE TO DEFEND THE BVAS MACHINES AS AGAINST THE CONTROVERSIAL SERVER REPORTS UPON WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN BASED HIS JUDGMENT.

16. THE APC PROPAGANDISTS AND MERCINARIES ARE HOLDING ON TO BIG LIES, A BASELESS REPORT TO TOPPLE A VALIDLY ELECTED GOVERNOR.

17. THE WORLD SHOULD BE TOLD THAT BVAS MACHINES USED FOR OSUN 2022 GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION HAD NO PROBLEM, NO OVER-VOTING, BUT A SERVER REPORT WHICH THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN ERRONEOUSLY RELIED UPON.

18. THE TRIBUNAL CHAIRMAN LACKED JURISDICTION BY VIRTUE OF SECTION 51(1),(2),(3) & (4) OF THE ELECTORAL ACT, 2022, TO DECLARE OYETOLA THE WINNER AFTER CANCELLING VOTES OF THE PARTIES ON THE BASIS OF THE SERVER REPORT, EVEN THOUGH THE BVAS MACHINES THEMSELVES AND THE FORMS EC8As TENDERED BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL DID NOT ESTABLISH SUCH.

- Compiled by Hashim Abioye Esq.

https://www.facebook.com/100028527937018/posts/pfbid02MqVzVaWGp2TAvYJdz2dhGKiLGL8JiwuZ81Lkn5a59wfHxBarqy5RajkH4MVye8DYl/?app=fbl

fact from erudite lawyer Hashim Abioye here. Can Seun the owner of nairaland move this post to front page 📄

Cc Seun cc nlfpmod cc lalasticlala cc justwise FP posts

It is so funny how Urchins are jubilating while the judiciary is messing the whole system up! Same happened in Imo state, now in Osun state but if care is not taking to curb this injustice Nigeria will turn to Banana Island where anything goes. I trust that APC will fail in this Adeleke case. I told you that by January APC will have problem. Now today is 29th January, 2023 and time is 4:15pm. Adeleke will retain his seat as the governor of Osun state. Those Judges has scammed Tinubu and shop his dollar. Supreme court will deliver in the favour of Adeleke. Mark my words and you can as well screen shot this

Give this to Adeleke, let him go to Appeal with this your Ogogoro joint analysis, Lateef Fagbemi SAN will destroy it in 5 minutes.

RHYTHM OF DESPERATION FROM THE OPPOSITION:
NO CAUSE FOR ALARM, Sen. ADEMOLA ADELEKE REMAINS GOVERNOR OF OSUN STATE.

The Osun Tribunal today 27th January, 2023 gave 2 rulings.
The undeniable truth establishing the fact that His Excellency, Sen Ademola Adeleke is eligible and qualified to contest for the July 16 governorship election was the first, and the second that Oyetola won the election while claiming the documents APC tendered to prove over-voting were incomplete due to non-inclusion of registers of voters used at the challenged units.

Isn’t this some sort of malicious ruling?

Well, let’s consider this judgment as a tool to distract good governance in the state, which the Executive Governor will not fall for.

Leveraging on the Boast of confidence to be back in power by July 2023, as said by the outgoing speaker of the Osun House of Assembly, it is evident that the opposition are desperate to continue amassing the common wealth of the citizens of Osun.

To the interest of the general public, kindly consider the judgement of the tribunal as a means to wet the appetite of opposition, and to boost their moral to vote Tinubu as the next president such that when he wins, they can boycott and by over the Appeal and Supreme Court ruling against Sen Ademola Adeleke which must never happen.
The paradigm shift of a true Democracy has begun in Osun State and Nigeria at large, and no court of law presided over by any bias judge or judicial panel will clamp down the gong of a new democracy.

This publication will also serve as note of reminder to all citizens of Osun that everyone should be determined to vote the candidate of their choice and as such a candidate that can transform the economy of the nation at the presidential polls, for the good of the state and the nation at large.

Meanwhile, Sen Ademola Adeleke remains the Executive Governor of Osun State and the people’s mandate this time will not be taken.

We await a positive Appeal court ruling.

Godwin ADEDAYO
Broadcast Journalists and Corporate Communications Executive.
Osun State.

JAMO84:
Give this to Adeleke, let him go to Appeal with this your Ogogoro joint analysis, Lateef Fagbemi SAN will destroy it in 5 minutes.

lateef fagbemi have been heavily defeated before, this is not the first time that he will be defeated in the Appeal court and Supreme Court of justice too. It’s 5 months process

Cc mynd44 cc Seun cc OAM4j cc nlfpmod FP

Johnnyessence:
fact from erudite lawyer Hashim Abioye here. Can Seun the owner of nairaland move this post to front page 📄

i hope he move it to front page.