zataxs:

@OLAADEGBU well unfortunately for you it is , and is verifiable, like science. very unlike your fairy tales,

zataxs:
 
The same methodology that brought you medicine, the internet, is used in all facets of science.

zataxs:

And the same methodology that brought you machetes on muslims faces in Nigeria, the crusade, the inquisition is the same one you are using to right now.

zataxs:

Why don't pray for your God to create a computer, let's see how far that will go

zataxs:

Maybe what you need is a lesson on how to use google.

OLAADEGBU:

"There are some questions that can't be answered by google"

zataxs:

@frosbel some people turn to magic when they get challenges in the real world

frosbel:



Some people think Google is the answer to all the questions in the world !

Kay 17:

If some scientists believe in God, does that mean the claim God exists is falsifiable?

OLAADEGBU:

Some of them even use Google to do their thesis/research work.

Martian:

Are you people just against anything progressive?? What is wrong with using google as a search engine or to supplement research work??

Now the battle is against search engines, I bet y'all would rather have lived in middle ages Europe when the Church was the source of all knowledge.

OLAADEGBU:

There is nothing wrong in using Google, it is just that : "There are some questions that can't be answered by Google"

Martian:

Still quoting from ICR?

Besides google doesn't answer questions, it's like a virtual library where you find information. It seems you just don't like the amount of information google is capable of coming up with because they contradict your views. Since you can't do anything about it, you demonize it.

OLAADEGBU:

No.  It only means that they are being consistent with their beliefs.  This is how scientists who believe in God explains it:

Most fields of science were developed by men who believed the Bible, such as Isaac Newton (dynamics, gravitation, calculus), Michael Faraday (electromagnetics, field theory), Robert Boyle (chemistry), Johannes Kepler (astronomy), and Louis Pasteur (bacteriology, immunization).  Francis Bacon, a Bible-believing Christian who developed the scientific method.

The reason such fields of science developed was the belief that God created the universe and that He instituted laws that we could investigate.  Even today, many great scientists believe the Bible and use good observational science on a daily basis.

Even logic flows naturally from a biblical worldview.  Since we are created in the image of a logical God, we would expect to have logical faculties.  However, logic is not a material entity, so it becomes a problem for the materialist atheist who denies the immaterial realm.  From a materialistic perspective, a logical thought is the same as an illogical thought, it is merely a chemical reaction in the brain.  From a materialistic point of view, then, the perception of logic is due to random processes and has nothing to do with absolute truth, which is also immaterial.

So in a biblical worldview, logic exists and so does truth, both of which are immaterial.  But in a purely materialistic worldview, there is no basis for logic or truth to exist, since they are immaterial.  And if our brains are the result of random mutations and natural selection, how do we know that our brains have evolved in a way that allows us to think and reason according to truth?

To state that logic can yield a truthful result means that absolute truth must exist, hence God.  This does not mean that atheists and evolutionists cannot use logic or do science.  But when they do, they must borrow from the above Christian principles, an action which is not consistent with their professed worldview.  Click here for more

Kay 17:

You insist your God is a supernatural being (whatever it means) which runs contrary to the foundational assumptions of science, that all causes are natural. i wonder how you managed to squeeze scientific explanations out of the bible and religious phenomena.

Kay 17:

Also, logic and faith are incompatible. If you were using logic, you wouldn't have the certainty to say Jesus resurrected from the dead.