Amid heightened tensions of a potential military invasion of the Niger Republic, which could escalate into a full-blown war, there are serious concerns that President Bola Tinubu could postpone presidential elections by four years should the Supreme Court order a rerun.

Mr Tinubu was, on March 1, declared the winner of the presidential poll adjudged fraudulent, with other candidates challenging his victory at the tribunal, where the case has been lingering for months. Nonetheless, the court will give a verdict no later than September 16 per the provisions of the Electoral Act, which states that petitions must be determined after 180 days.

Aggrieved parties are expected to take the tribunal’s outcome to the Supreme Court for a more robust judgment, which must be issued within 60 days, about mid-November.

Given the crucial nature of the matter and the trove of documents already admitted as evidence by the three candidates, the apex court may order a rerun among the top three contenders, Mr Tinubu (8.1 million votes), Atiku Abubakar of PDP (6.9 million votes) and Peter Obi of the Labour Party (6.1 million votes) to resolve the dispute.

But wielding the powers of the presidency, Mr Tinubu, who may have already invaded the Niger Republic by November, has the constitutional right to delay an election if the National Assembly grants his request.

It is highly unlikely that the Senate, led by Godswill Akpabio, a strong ally of Mr Tinubu whom he staunchly backed to clinch the position, would say no.

Also, members of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) make up most of the Senate, boasting 59 of 109 senators. They would give the president all the necessary support to ensure his requests are speedily acceded, even if it means delaying a court order.

On Friday, Mr Tinubu briefed the National Assembly on ECOWAS’ proposed military action and other sanctions against the coup plotters in the Niger Republic. Obtaining approval to delay the election, if required, seems to be a matter of thunderous ayes over minority nays.

Section 135 (3) of the constitution states that “If the federation is at war in which the territory of Nigeria is physically involved and the President considers that it is not practicable to hold elections, the National Assembly may by resolution extend the period of four years mentioned in subsection (2) of this section from time to time; but no such extension shall exceed a period of six months at any one time.”

While it may be wondered that the Niger Republic, with a small population of about 25 million people, would be easy to defeat, one can never be too certain in wars, particularly the one that now enjoys the alliance of Mali, Burkina Faso and rumoured support of Russia.

A valid case is that the U.S. invaded Afghanistan in 2001 to topple the Taliban following the September 11 attacks in which thousands were killed in coordinated bombings masterminded by Al-Qaeda terrorist Osama Bin Laden.

An invasion presumed to last a few weeks lasted decades, which saw the U.S. government eventually withdraw their troops from Afghanistan in disgrace and humiliation after 20 years.

Operation Iraqi Freedom is another example that captures the uncertainty of the duration of a war.

helinues:
It can only be from razor gazette, the warped media

Except those that have swapped their thinking brains for a pot of noddles would swallow this bunkum epistle

helinues:
It can only be from razor gazette, the warped media

Except those that have swapped their thinking brains for a pot of noddles would swallow this bunkum epistle

BossGerald:


Is that why EBOLA BALABLU wants to embark on war with niger by fire by force?? He don smell his defeat??

There's no peace for mandate thieves

the federation is at war in which the Territory of Nigeria is Physically involved

helinues:


Just imagine how the Obidients went Gaga with this Ebola of a thing as if the word came to be last week.

No be same way zombies dey act, no even reflection before joining the bad wagons

BossGerald:


EBOLA yekini Amoda TILUMBU

AKA Bobo chicago