Atiku’s Legal Contingency: Why Supreme Court May Remove President Tinubu From Power

The political atmosphere in Nigeria is currently turgid, pregnant and abuzz with discussions and speculations about the possibility of the Supreme Court removing President Bola Tinubu from power.

Atiku Abubakar’s legal team, led by Chris Uche SAN, filed a motion on notice at the Supreme Court, invoking Order 2 Rule 12 of 1985. This motion seeks to admit fresh evidence of certificate forgery and perjury in support of Atiku’s pending appeal before the Court. Atiku asserts that the evidence he presents proves that Tinubu’s Diploma Certificate from Chicago State University is not authentic and was allegedly forged.

The motion filed by Atiku’s legal team is predicated on several grounds, the most significant being the release of academic records of Tinubu and the deposition of the Registrar of Chicago State University before a United States Court. These grounds further highlight the fact that Tinubu was not qualified to contest the election as required by Section 137 (1) (j) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended).

This development stems from recent revelations and lingering legal actions initiated by Atiku Abubakar, the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2023 general elections. Atiku’s legal team has presented fresh evidence to the Supreme Court, accusing President Tinubu of forgery and perjury. In this article, we will delve into the details of this case and explore the reasons why the Supreme Court may decide to remove President Tinubu from power.

The Allegations of Forgery and Perjury
Atiku Abubakar’s legal team has submitted new evidence to the Supreme Court, alleging that President Tinubu forged a certificate from Chicago State University (CSU) and committed perjury by submitting it to Nigeria’s Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) during the 2023 presidential election. The crux of the matter lies in the authenticity of the academic records of President Tinubu, which were obtained from CSU following an Illinois court order. Atiku’s legal team claims that the certificate submitted by Tinubu to INEC is a forgery and that the Chicago evidence supports this claim.

The Role of Chicago State University
Chicago State University plays a pivotal role in this case as it was compelled by a US court order to release President Tinubu’s academic records to Atiku’s legal team. The university provided the requested documents, allowing Atiku’s lawyers to scrutinize the records for any alleged discrepancies. The obtained records include certificates of other students, which were requested to compare and identify potential inconsistencies.

[READ MORE ON 9NEWS NIGERIA - NIGERIA'S FAVOURITE NEWS SOURCE]
https://9newsng.com/atikus-legal-contingency-why-supreme-court-may-remove-president-tinubu-from-power/

Impossible

Atiku no won rest again o

No place for cyberspace oluwole certificate in our constitution

Even if you want to lie at least start your lies in the second paragraph!

Which political atmosphere did you describe with all those adjectives?

Joblessness and greediness will make someone like Atiku to use millions of Naira and Dollars to pursue useless case while left his poeple he claimed to love to govern in hunger without dishing any palliatives out for nigerians to make him better than Tinubu who remove subsidy with Cains for Nigerians.

if the supreme Court accept the new evidences, it's over for tinubu

oyichi:
if the supreme Court accept the new evidences, it's over for tinubu

Oblivious Senseless Things, with no iota of shame whatsoever, no wonder it was very easy for Gringory Obi & Atiku Malu to take them on a fantastic political voyage.

oyichi:
if the supreme Court accept the new evidences, it's over for tinubu

How can the Supreme Court of Nigeria accept a pre election issue?

zebrawebs:
Atiku’s Legal Contingency: Why Supreme Court May Remove President Tinubu From Power

The political atmosphere in Nigeria is currently turgid, pregnant, and abuzz with discussions and speculations about the possibility of the Supreme Court removing President Bola Tinubu from power.

Atiku Abubakar’s legal team, led by Chris Uche SAN, filed a motion on notice at the Supreme Court, invoking Order 2 Rule 12 of 1985. This motion seeks to admit fresh evidence of certificate forgery and perjury in support of Atiku’s pending appeal before the Court. Atiku asserts that the evidence he presents proves that Tinubu’s Diploma Certificate from Chicago State University is not authentic and was allegedly forged.

The motion filed by Atiku’s legal team is predicated on several grounds, the most significant being the release of academic records of Tinubu and the deposition of the Registrar of Chicago State University before a United States Court. These grounds further highlight the fact that Tinubu was not qualified to contest the election as required by Section 137 (1) (j) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended).

This development stems from recent revelations and lingering legal actions initiated by Atiku Abubakar, the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2023 general elections. Atiku’s legal team has presented fresh evidence to the Supreme Court, accusing President Tinubu of forgery and perjury. In this article, we will delve into the details of this case and explore the reasons why the Supreme Court may decide to remove President Tinubu from power.

The Allegations of Forgery and Perjury
Atiku Abubakar’s legal team has submitted new evidence to the Supreme Court, alleging that President Tinubu forged a certificate from Chicago State University (CSU) and committed perjury by submitting it to Nigeria’s Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) during the 2023 presidential election. The crux of the matter lies in the authenticity of the academic records of President Tinubu, which were obtained from CSU following an Illinois court order. Atiku’s legal team claims that the certificate submitted by Tinubu to INEC is a forgery and that the Chicago evidence supports this claim.

The Role of Chicago State University
Chicago State University plays a pivotal role in this case as it was compelled by a US court order to release President Tinubu’s academic records to Atiku’s legal team. The university provided the requested documents, allowing Atiku’s lawyers to scrutinize the records for any alleged discrepancies. The obtained records include certificates of other students, which were requested to compare and identify potential inconsistencies.

[READ MORE ON 9NEWS NIGERIA - NIGERIA'S FAVOURITE NEWS SOURCE]
https://9newsng.com/atikus-legal-contingency-why-supreme-court-may-remove-president-tinubu-from-power/

Order 2 cannot stand the test of time...

zebrawebs:
Atiku’s Legal Contingency: Why Supreme Court May Remove President Tinubu From Power

The political atmosphere in Nigeria is currently turgid, pregnant and abuzz with discussions and speculations about the possibility of the Supreme Court removing President Bola Tinubu from power.

Atiku Abubakar’s legal team, led by Chris Uche SAN, filed a motion on notice at the Supreme Court, invoking Order 2 Rule 12 of 1985. This motion seeks to admit fresh evidence of certificate forgery and perjury in support of Atiku’s pending appeal before the Court. Atiku asserts that the evidence he presents proves that Tinubu’s Diploma Certificate from Chicago State University is not authentic and was allegedly forged.

The motion filed by Atiku’s legal team is predicated on several grounds, the most significant being the release of academic records of Tinubu and the deposition of the Registrar of Chicago State University before a United States Court. These grounds further highlight the fact that Tinubu was not qualified to contest the election as required by Section 137 (1) (j) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended).

This development stems from recent revelations and lingering legal actions initiated by Atiku Abubakar, the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2023 general elections. Atiku’s legal team has presented fresh evidence to the Supreme Court, accusing President Tinubu of forgery and perjury. In this article, we will delve into the details of this case and explore the reasons why the Supreme Court may decide to remove President Tinubu from power.

The Allegations of Forgery and Perjury
Atiku Abubakar’s legal team has submitted new evidence to the Supreme Court, alleging that President Tinubu forged a certificate from Chicago State University (CSU) and committed perjury by submitting it to Nigeria’s Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) during the 2023 presidential election. The crux of the matter lies in the authenticity of the academic records of President Tinubu, which were obtained from CSU following an Illinois court order. Atiku’s legal team claims that the certificate submitted by Tinubu to INEC is a forgery and that the Chicago evidence supports this claim.

The Role of Chicago State University
Chicago State University plays a pivotal role in this case as it was compelled by a US court order to release President Tinubu’s academic records to Atiku’s legal team. The university provided the requested documents, allowing Atiku’s lawyers to scrutinize the records for any alleged discrepancies. The obtained records include certificates of other students, which were requested to compare and identify potential inconsistencies.

[READ MORE ON 9NEWS NIGERIA - NIGERIA'S FAVOURITE NEWS SOURCE]
https://9newsng.com/atikus-legal-contingency-why-supreme-court-may-remove-president-tinubu-from-power/

Confirmed Oblivious Mumurist, ignorant @ best, 3rd party vendor diploma replacement is forgery?

Bush Native Thing, 200 million Naira fine is what the Supreme Court is waiting to impose on that senseless Malu.

blabulu2000:



Order 2 cannot stand the test of time...

Atiku Abubakar confirmed cow, he claims Tinubu presented a forged certificate to INEC, so he went all the way to Illinois to collect the original authentic certificate of Tinubu from CSU to submit to the court as evidence?

Malu is always a Malu.

Tinubu is a clueless drug barron and a certificate forger. We can't have such criminal as President in this 21st Century!

zebrawebs:
Atiku’s Legal Contingency: Why Supreme Court May Remove President Tinubu From Power

The political atmosphere in Nigeria is currently turgid, pregnant and abuzz with discussions and speculations about the possibility of the Supreme Court removing President Bola Tinubu from power.

Atiku Abubakar’s legal team, led by Chris Uche SAN, filed a motion on notice at the Supreme Court, invoking Order 2 Rule 12 of 1985. This motion seeks to admit fresh evidence of certificate forgery and perjury in support of Atiku’s pending appeal before the Court. Atiku asserts that the evidence he presents proves that Tinubu’s Diploma Certificate from Chicago State University is not authentic and was allegedly forged.

The motion filed by Atiku’s legal team is predicated on several grounds, the most significant being the release of academic records of Tinubu and the deposition of the Registrar of Chicago State University before a United States Court. These grounds further highlight the fact that Tinubu was not qualified to contest the election as required by Section 137 (1) (j) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended).

This development stems from recent revelations and lingering legal actions initiated by Atiku Abubakar, the presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in the 2023 general elections. Atiku’s legal team has presented fresh evidence to the Supreme Court, accusing President Tinubu of forgery and perjury. In this article, we will delve into the details of this case and explore the reasons why the Supreme Court may decide to remove President Tinubu from power.

The Allegations of Forgery and Perjury
Atiku Abubakar’s legal team has submitted new evidence to the Supreme Court, alleging that President Tinubu forged a certificate from Chicago State University (CSU) and committed perjury by submitting it to Nigeria’s Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) during the 2023 presidential election. The crux of the matter lies in the authenticity of the academic records of President Tinubu, which were obtained from CSU following an Illinois court order. Atiku’s legal team claims that the certificate submitted by Tinubu to INEC is a forgery and that the Chicago evidence supports this claim.

The Role of Chicago State University
Chicago State University plays a pivotal role in this case as it was compelled by a US court order to release President Tinubu’s academic records to Atiku’s legal team. The university provided the requested documents, allowing Atiku’s lawyers to scrutinize the records for any alleged discrepancies. The obtained records include certificates of other students, which were requested to compare and identify potential inconsistencies.

[READ MORE ON 9NEWS NIGERIA - NIGERIA'S FAVOURITE NEWS SOURCE]
https://9newsng.com/atikus-legal-contingency-why-supreme-court-may-remove-president-tinubu-from-power/

hahahaha

favor914:
How can the Supreme Court of Nigeria accept a pre election issue?

By electoral Act 2022,issue of qualification can be pre or post election matter. There is likelihood that S'court would not admit a new evidence ,this is consistent with provisions of electoral Act 2022. It ought to have been brought up within 21 days after the announcement of presidential election result. As it is now,it is dead on arrival.

favor914:
Atiku Abubakar confirmed cow, he claims Tinubu presented a forged certificate to INEC, so he went all the way to Illinois to collect the original authentic certificate of Tinubu from CSU to submit to the court as evidence?

Malu is always a Malu.

😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆













😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆