torres2:



Can't hear you at the top of the table. Kindly use a loudspeaker.

incredibleone:
Will u people leave hazard alone? Jees let him be abeg,na crime to b a big talent? He z d best dribbler in football,gradually he z getting there,the amount of critic,and advice in form of criticism is a proof u all like him,but he plays for cfc,xo u hate him

Odunharry:

buhahahahahah....u dy mind chekpe supporters?
Hazard is good bt d hyping is too much

i would still pick Nani of today over Hazard

elampiro:


You don't need to prove anything about Hazard's quality. Even those arguing against you know the truth deep down. They did same thing here for a long period trying to rubbish Arjen Robben until the world cup vindicated some of us who have always appreciated his football. Those who know football know a world class player when they see one.

Again, another official list puts Hazard above the likes of Silva. The Players and Coaches who voted are the best in the world. Should some professional stumble on this thread, they would think the posters are village drunks for the ridiculous things being posted.

Just take a look, EPL official list twice= Hazard. Whoscored = Hazard. FIFA/national coaches+captans= Hazard.


Among the argument so far,on THIS THREAD the only one I don't agree with is Di Maria vs Hazard. In the rest argument, Hazard is the winner. Even Fabregas said Hazard is the Messi of Chelsea.

If they said Hazard had a bad world cup and still make this least, it only tells how much he is respect and valued by the professional players, coaches who are authority in the game.

You may have been crowed out in this argument but you are correct.

Hugoboi:


Rubbish

Your arguments are always emotion laden. That has always been your sore point. How can you even keep a straight face while typing the above when it's clear as light of day that awards are given out based on performance over a certain window. If that be the case, what is the justification for Hazard's inclusion and Sanchez's exclusion knowing fully well that Hazard had both a season and world cup to forget while Sanchez came through both smelling of roses.

Some of your arguments here put the 'b' in bizarre...

raumdeuter:


Best player where and in which yr?

Hazard winning best young player at 23? I am sure those who gave him that award were mocking him.

At under 23, Gotze was winning the world cup, Ronaldo and Messi were already best players, Ronaldo was dominating Euro cup at 19

But our Hazard is winning young player at 23. I am sure OBJ would be named Youth leader in your ward

Hugoboi:


Rubbish

Your arguments are always emotion laden. That has always been your sore point. How can you even keep a straight face while typing the above when it's clear as light of day that awards are given out based on performance over a certain window. If that be the case, what is the justification for Hazard's inclusion and Sanchez's exclusion knowing fully well that Hazard had both a season and world cup to forget while Sanchez came through both smelling of roses.

Some of your arguments here put the 'b' in bizarre...

elampiro:


cry river if you wish.

* In how many windows has Hazard got officially rated than Silva?

* Sanchez was just a member of Barcelona team. Hazard is the Messi of Chelsea. Don't you get it?

Any further question. Pls direct it to FIFA.

Hugoboi:


Rubbish

Your arguments are always emotion laden. That has always been your sore point. How can you even keep a straight face while typing the above when it's clear as light of day that awards are given out based on performance over a certain window. If that be the case, what is the justification for Hazard's inclusion and Sanchez's exclusion knowing fully well that Hazard had both a season and world cup to forget while Sanchez came through both smelling of roses.

Some of your arguments here put the 'b' in bizarre...

Hugoboi:


Another dumb analogy.. What Sanchez is to the Chilean team, Hazard will never be to Belgium. You can stuff the official rating BS. Hazard was miles behind Sanchez and there is no way he would have bested him to list if same was devoid of the usual FIFA asskissing. Maybe next, you will rate Hazard over Suarez because he was omitted as well. Boss abeg, go and sip tea....

Danhumprey:
You dey mind Elampawa? He is so blind by emotion that he neglect facts and common sense when arguing most times! Smh.

Odunharry:
Rooney injured?

SIRcumalot:
Hazard deserves to be on the list.
Their are weaker people on that list than Sanchez and most of you think hazard inclusion is the wrong one ?
Suarez isn't on the least because of his Propensity to snack on expose flesh mid game.
The award will be a joke if we gave it to a borderline Cannibal.
It is the same reason Zizou lost to Cannavaro.

coogar:


you are a joker......
what has suarez's suspension(which he's served) gotta do with the shortlist?

when zizou lost to cannavaro, was he shortlisted or not? why is suarez not shortlisted? cos he's not a european?

SIRcumalot:

Then how do you explain is absence ?
His the third best player in the world he wasn't shortlist how else would you spin it.

Things were done differently back then.

raumdeuter:


Best player where and in which yr?

Hazard winning best young player at 23? I am sure those who gave him that award were mocking him.

At under 23, Gotze was winning the world cup, Ronaldo and Messi were already best players, Ronaldo was dominating Euro cup at 19

But our Hazard is winning young player at 23. I am sure OBJ would be named Youth leader in your ward

elampiro:


Then CR7 shouldn't even make the list because he was piss poo at the world cup. He missed the highest number of CCC. His goals to shot return was poo.

* As for Suarez. his indiscipline ruined him. Same way his indiscipline paved way for Bale to win EPL player of the year 2013 and RVP golden boot 2013.

JayKayMaybachz:
⬆⬆
New research by the CIES Football Observatory has revealed that only one club in Europe has produced more footballers currently playing in Europe’s top leagues.United currently have developed 36 players compared to Barcelona’s 43, but completely outshine every other English club in terms of player production.2. Manchester United – 36 players9. Arsenal – 22 players45. Tottenham Hotspur, Southampton, Chelsea and Manchester City – 12 players

*Afta some yeye fanatics co dhey yan dust for United thread

incredibleone:
chelsea nd man city av some mind blowing prospect,but man u don try sha....nd where is ajax plsssssss?? Munich??

coogar:


zidane threw his head into someone's chest in a world cup final that close to a billion people viewed and he was still shortlisted for the award later that year....

suarez didn't even make the top 23 selected by FIFA's technical committee. isn't that a farce on its own. at least, let the voters decide themselves on suarez's case instead of yanking him off from the shortlisted candidates.

this is exactly why maradona was angry with FIFA. suarez bit someone & he was crucified. a french player committed something close to murder on a nigerian player & the matter was swiftly swept under the rug. if the reverse was the case, onazi would have been banned for life.