I didn't do it but saw it advertised on some site. I figure shilling would like to be aware of it. . .

Sure, it has few issues here and there but it's clean, functionalstraight to the point: www.

@poster,i work with ...can i ask for your opinions and inputs for me to work on

Sure. From a bird's eye view:

1) http://www./dealer - the form on this page isn't validating properly. Also, look to offer front end validation as well, not just back end. This will also help reduce the load on your servers, especially if the site gets heavy traffic. NOte that this may also apply to other forms on the site

2) On the vehicles details page, only show photos if they exist. In other words, there is no need for "no image" to show.

3) "view mobile site" at top left should do just that - take me to the mobile site. No need for a modal to explain to me what I think is pretty much standard these days. As for the SMS, again, no need sending it to me. If I click the link, I expect to be taken to the site.

4) I see flags at top left but I couldn't tell what they were for. At first, I thought they were for translations but when I noticed the countries the flags belonged to, I clicked, only to be taken to the country's specific site. Maybe the call to action should be more explicit.

Just to add to wots being said....When a user has clicks on a particular car instead of details of that car showing up on another page, a modal box should pop up on that same page showing details of the car. This will greatly increase the usability of the site . Ive attached a mockup to explain what i mean.

Doncigalo, good one but let me add to you addition if I may

I once worked for a popular auto website in the US. It was all about clicks. Why? Clicks drove traffic which drove ad revenue. In other words, revenue trumped usability. . .and they always got millions of hits daily. I don't know if that is the thinking here sha.

May I suggest a possible compromise? To tease the customer, have a modal with a summary and a "more" link or button to the detailed page.

*Creeps past*. . .

@yawatide tru, aint arguing wit u on dat , but these two websites operate on two total different models. checki.com.ng doesn't operate on a pay per click ad revenue model, they generate revenue from folks who want to advertise their cars on the website. So I would seriously consider the usability of the site as a top priority, this will ensure that users can easily browse and find what they r looking for, this automatically translates in a positive browsing experience that increases the number of visitors to the site, which as a result leads to more sales.

^^^ fair enough. . .

yawa-ti-de:
I didn't do it but saw it advertised on some site. I figure shilling would like to be aware of it. . .

Sure, it has few issues here and there but it's clean, functionalstraight to the point: www.

Like you said, clean, functional and straight to the point. Nothing impressive here, sorry!

^^^ Too bad.