Sangoamadioha1:



We don hear😏. Believe anything you want and leave people to believe they want. With all your grand standing, you are just as clueless about life like everyone else. If you don't believe in prayers, keep it to yourself and allow those that believe in prayers do their thing.

How did you interpret my post as me not allowing people who believe in prayers do their thing?

Nonsense

Work hard to make your heart desires come to pass. praying is a futile attempt. there's been no single study that points to prayer being useful. Templeton Foundation (a religious group) ran a study and found out prayers are useless

You would have the same success praying to a milk jug as you do praying to god -- the milk jug sometimes answers your prayer the way you want to, sometimes not and sometimes the answer is delayed. See the problem here? If things turn out the way you want them to, you say it was because you prayed. If not, it's because god knows what's best and you didn't pray for the right thing. Or, if it happens 10 years later you say god answered your prayer, it was just delayed. This is nonsense. You would have the exact same effect doing nothing.

I'm confident we'd win at Allianz on Tuesday

Awesome01:


What I don't understand is that: if all this is so evident and obvious , why are the club presidents of la liga clubs so tongue tied about these bias happenings.

They should show their grievances about Tebas double standards and vote to remove him.

I have no problems with Madrid doing anything and everything to win but where the president of la liga cannot be objective enough to give everyone a sense of competition it becomes flawed from the start. A foul play.

LMAO, Madrid have been voting against Tebas for long now while your club keeps voting for his policies. Seems your club sees something you're not seeing

Kilishihunter:

Everybody is talking about the goal which has even taken the spotlight off Vazquez's dive for the first goal, Saka did the same stuff against Bayern Munich in the UCL but didn't get a penalty so can you imagine the scenes if the roles were reversed, Wetin dey vex me about all this would still be the funny section of their section shouting negreira despite we being on the end of lots of key 50/50 decisions

In no world was Vazquez falling a dive lol. Barca fans keep focusing on Vazquez right leg but turn blind eye on his left leg which what clipped by overrated Cubarsi. Go and watch the replays again and focus on the left leg of Vazquez and you can see he tried to jump over the outstretched legs of Cubarsi but was tripped

Instead of blaming your Defender for sliding like an idiot or Even João Cancelo for going for a bodycheck rather than focus on the ball which he had advantage for Which made him get lost and couldn't recover which in turn put the rest of the defense under immense pressure trying to cover for him and lead to stupid tackle by Cubarsi which lead to the penalty. You're here blaming Tebas, referee, Var, uefa, CNN, UNICEF, UN, NATO etc. keep blaming them lol
Same way you blamed referee for your loss to PSG but didn't work on preventing their first goal from happening again which is why Vazquez scored a similar goal against you days later. Keep blaming so Cancelo can keep defending like Berbatov and Cubarsi can keep throwing his legs around like a retard. No need to correct anything when you can just blame ref and call it a day

jpmoriarti:
Yeahh that's the problem. Everything works in Real Madrid favour in laliga. Once there's a doubtful/ controversial decision, it ends up in there favour. That's how you know a corrupt club. All 50/50 situation goes in their favour.

If the situation of this ghost goal was reserved, that is, it was Real Madrid who scored a goal and it wasn't sure if it was a goal, the referee will award it for Real Madrid.

Remember all the handball goals they scored, if it were other teams, it's definitely a handball but ones it is Real Madrid, it'll be determined as shoulder goal and allowed.

The only referee who had the gut to stand against their corruption against Valencia, that's Gil Manzano, was suspended since that incident for a long time. I don't know of he has refereed a laliga match since then. Fortunately for him, he's the only Laliga referee drafted to officiate in upcoming Euros. That shows he's been vindicated.

Lmao! Every 50-50? Hahaha

Aemmyjah:



So you agree with Jaephoenix that your brain is poorly made?

Whatever you say is correct boss

jpmoriarti:
This is what Barça and other clubs have had to contend with.

Real Madrid controls everything in Spain, from the government to the league to the referees to the media. And they're the one that controls the narrative. They cry victim to serve as smokescreen while they perpetuate their grand scheme of corruption.

I hear the government is designing a new tax law that will allow new foreigners earning a certain amount to avoid paying tax.

This is believed to be targeted to Mbappe imminent arrival, to allow him to earn as much as he is earning in PSG, while Real Madrid avoids paying more in taxes. It is outrageous.

Funny thing about the "Referee" part is that Tebas doesn't control the referees. It's RFEF that does that. Also remind me sir, which club was paper trail of almost €8M in payment traced from them to former head of refereeing? If my memory serves the club's name starts with B, ends with A and seems to have arcelon in the middle but I can't seem to remember everything

hensben:
Imagine a president is a fan of Real Madrid, no wonder the league is corrupt and duo-policed

Everyone knew he was a Madrid fan before being voted in and clubs still believed he will carry out his duties without his being a Madrid fan affecting it. You must be deceiving yourself if you think even referees don't have their favourite teams and in a country like Spain most of them will be soft or hardcore Real Madrid or Barcelona fans anyways. Do you also know Real Madrid votes against him a lot and he doesn't like Perez? They don't see eye to eye. Perez refused so sell future TV rights (CVC deal) also voted against increasing his salary. Did you know YOUR CLUB, Barcelona, voted to increase his salary?

jaephoenix:

I'm sorry, u can't debate Aemmyjah. Dude is denser than they come. You'll just collapse out if his sheer retardation. Don't bother

Thanks for the heads up

Aemmyjah read about William Lane Craig's "Kalam cosmological argument". Probably watched a few debates that some "atheist professor" went up against Craig and couldn't satisfactorily, according to Craig, dismantle the argument and felt hes finally gotten an eureka moment that would not only demolish atheism but also prove Christian god is actually real and true.
He however made one fatal mistake, he used the argument in a way that the "original" arguer, Craig, never intended it to be used. Craig, whenever he's making the argument always shy away from saying this is proof Christianity is true and says something like "This is just an argument for a generic god, not the Christian god" which means he's making th argument for "Deism" not even "Theism" let alone "Christianity". Craig wouldn't dare do that because he knows he would be demolished which is why he would then move to other arguments very fast. Infact Craig's only argument for Christianity is that "Christ rose from the dead because if he didn't then bla bla bla bla". Same Craig however was once asked a question by a debater saying "If it happens that we invent a time machine tomorrow and we go back in time on the so-called resurrection day and we wait but jesus doesn't come out of the tomb would he still believe Christianity is true"
Craig said he would still be a Christian regardless lol


I would've loved to debate a nairalander based on the arguments you copied and pasted asides the last part about it being the bible god but looking at your conclusion it won't take long before someone like you will expose the fact that you don't even understand enough the position you chose


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y-IbL-yLkk


That's video of WLC debating an actual Cosmologist using Kalam cosmological argument and you can see Craig seems like a fish out of water. Sean argument boils down to "Craig, you're not even knowledgeable enough to be labeled 'wrong'"

BigkokoRep:
Not at all! The moment anyone kills for a god, gods or G-d, it makes the being an invalid.

not necessarily but I guess we're on the same page

BigkokoRep:
My point is that the coward, like many others like him, avoid Muslims because of real consequences! Even the owner of nairaland, a self styled atheist avoid Muhammadeens and Muhammad...
And this is because Christians & Christianity is largely peaceful and so forgiving!

Well, as me be Judeo-Christian, anyone wey try me, go collect wotowoto...after the wotowoto, I go forgive am!

I think I got your point even the first time. My question still stands though. Does humans killing another human for a statement that criticises an all-powerful entity affect the validity of such a statement?

BigkokoRep:
If they born you well mention Muhammad and Arabs.... Na Christian body these cowards dey get power!

Let me understand your point. If he mentions Mohammed being an ordinary zealot and then gets beheaded by angry Muslim mob. Does that prove or disprove Mohammed being an ordinary zealot?

raumdeuter:


Guantanamo is for people who planned terror attacks on US

oh! sweet summer child

raumdeuter:


The concept of human right or anything free is applcable only in the west

Guantanamo bay says hi!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEbFtMgGhPY

abduleez1:


I no wan follow you exchange words cos you're actually the one talking stupidly. If I give you my location sef, dem no born you we'll talk the nonsense wey you just yarn.

Why were Barca attacking around the 75th minute and hunting for a goal after going a goal down and with ten men?? Why dem attack? Shebi na 10 man.

because they NEEDED to in order to get back in the game. You can't attack and pressure from 30 minutes onwards with a peer team and not render your players dead on their feet by 70 minutes. You have to defend earlier and then try to snatch a victory later in the game by zerg rush

OkpaNsukkaisBae:
Na city and Pep be my hope now.

how's your hope now?

PJtech:


Oga sh^t the f^^k if you don't have any reasonable thing to say. What was he supposed to do? He should leave the guy to go and score as a defender

considering Barcola is hardly known for his finishing and Barcelona being 2 goals ahead in the tie, it makes sense to let him shoot. Best case scenario he misses or MAtS saves it. Worst case scenario he scores and Barcelona would still be a goal ahead in the tie while also having 11 men to play with. It was a brain-dead move from Araujo and I think the true idiots are those who think what Araujo did made any sense.

Okay

At some point, you will be the next person on Earth to die.

Deemas:


You're a fool. Is Palestine a country? Go and validate yourself.

There's a reason I used the word country in quote but you're too dumb to know what it implies

Obaranje:
go and tell okuama community in ugheli this story, they needs it more than us

2 wrongs don't make a right

Deemas:


Which Palestinian in the strip is innocent? If only Northern christians in Nigeria can be as ruthless as the Jews, Muslim nonsense would have been curbed.

You're comparing 2 "countries" fighting to an insurgency? Mumu

Kukutenla:

It seems people like you want everyone to believe that only Hamas has the license to kill innocents. I hardly hear any of you condemn what happened on Oct 7th. It's the response to that event you usually criticise.
No matter how you want to paint it, the aggressor here is Hamas. They are only limited by their war capabilities. If they had as much capabilities as Israel, I suspect folks like you will find more peace in spreading "pray for Israel" hashtags.
Hamas still exist in Gaza. Tell them to come out and face what they asked for instead of hiding behind civilians like cowards

You guys keep missing the point. Were those bombed by precision drone strikes in the vans "Hamas hiding behind civilians"?

Fourthpredator:

I am an atheist like you so it is not about israel being the 'chosen country of God'that is influencing my response.

even if reverse were the case I'd still discuss it anyways.

Hamas launches thousands of missiles into israel every month before the war if not for Iron Dome, tens of thousands of israelis would have died so stop pretending that hamas is innocent or that hamas is not waging war in israel.[/quote ] Bravo! You just strawmanned me very badly you can counter this by telling me exactly where I even implied Hamas is "innocent" [quote]The only reason most people think israel is commiting a genocide in Gaza is because Israel is stronger than Hamas militarily. If there strength were on the same level,you would realize that a lot of people would died on both Hamas and Israel sides.

This still doesn't even address my point. Seems you just love the sound of your voice bro. Perhaps you should've made this as your own fresh post rather than a reply to me

Anyways war is war,war is not a picnic.
Nigeria starved over a million biafran citizens (which were mostly innocent children who knew nothing about the reason for the civil war)to Death and Gowon the person behind it is still alive today which should tell you that LIFE IS NOT FAIR.
The same thing that justifies muslims killing Deborah Samuel for 'blasphemy' and Atefe Rajabi Saahaaleh a 16 year old girl for being raped(she was tried on adultery because she was raped by a married man who was a paedophile).
The same reason muslims kill time and time again even in afghanistan that is practicing sharia law and is a conservative islamic nation which just shows that they are blood thirsty and are just hiding under mohamed to cause chaos.

way to go buddy. You still haven't addressed my post at all

If a poll is carried out tomorrow on whether to nuke Gaza because I am a good person who wants all muslims to meet and have sex with 72 virgins,I will support nuking Gaza.
You might say there are a lot of innocent children in gaza but those innocent children will grow up to attack israel in the future so it is better to nip this in the bud now.

this shows you are ignorant. You assume Gazans are 100% Muslims. Newsflash, they are not. They still have Christians amongst them but don't let facts get in the way of your ethnic cleansing stance. BTW as much as I think most politicians are idiots discussing with the average man like you makes me feel better about politicians idiocy.
Let's even assume all Gazans are Muslims and "terrorists" (a term that is determined by which direction your weapon is pointing) and they get nuked, do you think Israel would survive even a week afterwards? Because Muslims comprise 18% of Israeli population and many of those IDF fighting in Gaza are actually Muslims. You think they'd just go "tough luck Gaza" and just go on business as usual?




BTW all I posted that you replied was just me looking at the event from the lenses of the aid workers but it seems you missed it completely

Picture this. You're in a war torn "country" to help the starving by giving out foods donated worldwide by fellow caring people. You've got three trucks and you've given your routes to those in control of the area to avoid mistakes. as you're about carrying out your duty your vehicle was struck by an ordinance from a drone. Not to be deterred you picked up your injured and managed to get to the other vehicle and continued your mission while reporting that you're being fired upon to the military responsible for the area. Few minutes later the vehicle you're in gets bombed again and this time there were more injuries. Nevertheless you still managed to drag yourself and others to the third and final vehicle. Now you're seven in the vehicle with varying degrees of injuries. You get to the third vehicle and again you were bombed. This time you didn't survive

The bombers in that story are Israelis and this incident calls into question thousands of "Hamas terrorists" they've been claiming to have killed. Ask yourself what if most of those labelled "terrorists" and getting bombed by Israelis in this war aren't really terrorists but innocent people?
Note that this story of three vehicles getting bombed made mainstream news just cuz those killed were charity volunteers from several countries. If these people were Palestinians then Israelis would've just said they were terrorists and that would be it afterall dead men tell no tales

AllahRapesPigs:

Put your best foot forward. I have debated real atheists from the West and they had no answers to my Christian arguments which show the validity of the Christian faith as a source of salvation and moral guidance.

I'd like to hear these "Christian arguments" of yours that "real atheists from the West" couldn't answer.

Hooray!!

And on that day their god they gathered there for decided to work in "mysterious ways", ways extremely similar to nonexistence

Because we have survival instinct in us. It takes great effort to override that instinct no matter what your believe