@therationa,
Anyone looked at this one yet?
Well, while answers are being offered at the others which you floated, one wonders if you have carefully looked at them and offered sound counter-argumnents to sustain your premises. Have you done so?
Care to begin to do so in all of your previous threads? 
Some of my other threads
How many of such threads have you debated issues on a serious note?
Thanks for leaving us the link - and no, I won't be brash to allege "plagiarism" here!

Anyhow, the list you re-posted to form "
your" thread does not say anything about
your own reasoning. Nonetheless, Clarence Williams may need to edit his fallacies for a seasoned debate if he hopes to sustain his arguments.
For example, this:
6) Bring back the hearts of the fathers to the children (Mal 3:24)
Malachi (abbreviated as 'Mal') has only
18 verses to chapter 3, and
not 24! As I do not want to be forward, could you kindly get in touch and enquire what he meant?
2) Gather all Jews to the Land of Israel (Is 43:5-6) In addition all Jews will know the Torah without study (Jer 31:33)
Jeremiah 31:33 does not teach that all Jews will "know the Torah without study". Infact, here is what it says:
But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people.
Certainly, the next verse (34) says that no one would need to be taught to know the LORD, for they all shall know Him. This again does not mean that they would "know the Torah without study", for it is one thing to know the
Torah and quite another thing to know the
LORD! One may have knowledge of the
Torah and yet be spiritually bankrupt in knowing the
LORD - did Clarence Williams understand that at all?
When
you feel in good spirits to debate or discuss these issues, I have my answers waiting.
Cheers.
