raumdeuter:


psg 1 Man utd 3 with thiago silva

Man Utd 1 psg 3 without thiago silva

barcelona 6 psg 1 with thiago silva

barcelona 1 psg 4 without thiago silva

Where is the confusion here?

Boateng 2 CL 1 world cup

Thiago Silva 0 world cup, 0 CL still jumping in the stand, shebi he is fit today why dem no start am vs Porto

raumdeuter:


Lewandoski would have scored 3 of those 31 shots

Kilishihunter:

Yup they are more dynamic and versatile If it's counter Attacking or holding you down in your midfield they do both That's where I would say they edge it more than their barca counterparts They have proven to be legendary but I still think they have to do more to be put on an equal pedestal with xavi and co

hensben:
Individually, Xavi> Kroose
Iniesta=Modric
Casemiro>>Bousquet.


Collectively, Madrid trio> Barca trio.

raumdeuter:


Thiago Silva played under multiple coaches, From Ancelotti, to Tuchel to Blanc to Emery and was a disaster all through

The defender who supervised the worst loss in CL history

6-1 loss after a 4-0 home win

Tuchel smart see as he put am on the stand to dey jump with supporters club

Melvyn11:

*Modric>>>>>>>>>>>>Xavi
*Kroos>>>Iniesta

hensben:
Individually, Xavi> Kroose
Iniesta=Modric
Casemiro>>Bousquet.


Collectively, Madrid trio> Barca trio.

Note: Madrid trio will perform better individually in another club.

raumdeuter:


He told you facts only, Bayern conceded 2 without Boateng today

ShadowCracker:

Bayern without Boatank - losing 2-0.
Bayern with Boatank - winning 2-1 .

Hansi Flick yanked of Sule before half-time to bring on Boatank, was the masterpiece that saved the tie.

Boatank starts second leg, Bayern progress .

timbros:
2012 we hired a new coach mid-season, struggled in the league (finished 6th), knocked out a Portuguese team in quarter finals, won UCL...

2021 we hired a new coach mid-season, struggling in the league (currently 5th), playing a Portuguese team in the quarter final..... Are you thinking what I'm thinking?

Meanwhile Chilly be giving me Torres vibes...

popizaino:


And conceded one playing some few minutes,only God knows how many he would have conceded if he played from the beginning.

hensben:
No. kroose and xavi are the dictator, they are more deep in midfield than iniesta and Modric. Iniesta and Modric are the runners or rather ball careers hence my placement.

ShadowCracker:

Psg vs Bayern >>> Chelsea vs Portshit.

swiz123:


I have noticed that you think I have a favourite Chelsea player. My favourite player was Hazard. I don't have any in this current squad... Only Kante comes close.

The funny thing is, you can't point to any post of mine hailing Havertz to show he is my favourite. You just assumed that I fancy Havertz very much because I criticise Mount.

While Havertz has not lived up to expectations, I also feel Mount is being overhyped by some fans. I like him because he is hard-working; but then, there is only so much hardwork can achieve without talent.

Melvyn11:

Anyhow you arrange it, Xavi and Iniesta are not better than either Modric or Kroos.

hensben:
Rest for this mount matter. Mount is talented and hardworking. Every coach love hardworking players.

Exonerate1:


This Chelsea twitter admin is something else

hensben:
Individually, Xavi> Kroose
Iniesta=Modric
Casemiro>>Bousquet.


Collectively, Madrid trio> Barca trio.

Note: Madrid trio will perform better individually in another club.

popizaino:


Stop spinning narratives jare .....Mount is only very hardworking and not talented. Let's be guided pls .

hensben:
So you think is only by leg over and skills that classified as talent. He is talented just that technically Havertz is better. That shoot and turn he did yesterday takes great technique to do that.

hensben:
I think Xavi is slightly better than kroos. Modric and iniesta are on par. I watched xavi and iniesta during their prime so I know what I am saying

Kilishihunter:

Madrid trio would perform in a better club than the Barca trio yes But I might not agree with your individual comparisons fully As great as Xavi was Most analysts still rate iniesta above him To me iniesta only lacked Messi's consistent finishing he had the rest of his abilities Dribbling Technicality Passing prowess Vision and scoring clutch goals too for both club and country As for Casemiro and busquets In areas of strength and tackling and even scoring you may be right but what I know is that Sergio busquets has been massively underrated throughout his career even by his own fans You could hardly win the ball off prime busquets He would find a way to confuse you and he was the anchor man for that trio and still the one for Spain currently He might not have the brute strength, energy and dirty work Casemiro brings to real but he covers up for it with intelligent passing ball winning and high pressing Don't let his lanky frame deceive you

popizaino:


Stop spinning narratives jare .....Mount is only very hardworking and not talented. Let's be guided pls .

hensben:
First and foremost the primary duty of a CDM is to defend, do dirty work for the team before passing. Secondly, Bousquet is a system player, if he play for any team not Barcelona he will seen as average player. Casemiro beat him hands down. If Jorginho was to be in Barca during xavi and iniesta era he will be hailed to high heaven, that’s how you will be seeing him to be great.
Individually, Madrid trio will perform better.

ennyjay72:
so mount has no talent?
wow

hensben:
So you think is only by leg over and skills that classified as talent. He is talented just that technically Havertz is better. That shoot and turn he did yesterday takes great technique to do that.

Bombblacks:

Is Xavi, Iniesta and Messi not system players as well? What is bad in being a system player?

swiz123:


You know what talent means but sentiment won't let you stop spinning. In case if you don't know, let me describe what a talented mildfielder looks like.

A talented mildfielder is one who has exceptional passing ability, excellent first touch which he uses to catch opponents off guard, creative thinking which makes him create chances out of nothing and an excellent vision.

Kelvin De Bruyne is a perfect example. We used to have Cesc Fabregas and Juan Mata, both of whom had high productivity but were sadly maligned by some fans for not being physical.

nathz45:
please for the sake of next time, connect your brain to your hands before typing

write a short note on TALENT.

hensben:
So you think is only by leg over and skills that classified as talent. He is talented just that technically Havertz is better. That turn and shoot he did yesterday takes great technique to do that.

Unlimited22:

So any midfielder below the ranks of Kdb, Prime Mata and Prime fab is not talented?