christistruth01:




Fani Kayode can afford to rent house on his street and put the mother and her Children in that house with Servants to take care of the kids

That way he can see the kids everyday


In Yoruba Culture it is the mother who looks after the Young kids because it is best for them

Fool

Which useless culture.

Did Kayode marry a Yoruba girl

Oga mind your damn business.

What's the big deal if the children stay with the father, provided he gets all the necessary requirements for them and allow their mother to visit them??
What if those children were born in the United States and taken away from the mother by the government as a result of a reported abuse??
It's better to respect people's decision about their personal life. Some issues are more complicated than how they are reported to you by some of these Bloggers.

Karemarealty288:
That woman is irresponsible and cannot take care of the children, he can give her unlimited access to visit them but taking care of them is what she is built for

and you think the black and white man wey dey say good morning for night can take good care of those children. Efcc matter dey more important for am oh

Fani Kayode a 60 year old man with several kids wouldn't be keeping some toddlers away from their mother if he wasn't certain there is danger lurking

RodgersAkpafu:

You guys will be the same people running their mouth when a Nigerian woman acts this way to the father of her kids abroad

Fathers should have custody and full control of the children during separation and the mothers should be allowed to pay visits. These visits should be supervised by the fathers.

Things are better and apt that way. Fathers hardly play the petty, mean, abject and lamentable games women vindictively play during separation, dispute with their spouses and the need to prove a worthless point; for example, parental alienation and denying access to the kids to make the man suffer by weaponising his love for and bond with the children. Fathers hardly do that.

Also, unlike women, men are usually more mature and more loving to prioritise the children's wellbeing and happiness over petty disputes, hard feelings, emotional grievances and vindictiveness against their spouses; they do not unnecessarily rope in the kids into any spite regardless of how the kids feel, neither do they weaponise them and the love and bond their spouses have for the kids. Hardly will you see a man poisoning his kids' minds against his spouse out of spite and vindictiveness. Men hardly do these things.

Fathers are usually inclined to work for the betterment, peace, stability and happiness of their children and their wives (if they are cooperative and decent). Most men want that big, happy family that last forever. This is why fathers must get the upper hand and full control when it comes to custody battles.


NB: No one should mention me. I don't have time.

Karemarealty288:
That woman is irresponsible and cannot take care of the children, he can give her unlimited access to visit them but taking care of them is what she is built for

Can you tell your mother not to take care of you, foolish man

Lightway:


Shut up

The woman is jobless. How will she take care of four children

Answer only a riff raff will give

Martinez39s:
Fathers should have custody and full control of the children during separation and the mothers should be allowed to pay visits. These visits should be supervised by the fathers.

Things are better and apt that way. Fathers hardly play the petty, mean, abject and lamentable games women vindictively play during separation, dispute with their spouses and the need to prove a worthless point; for example, parental alienation and denying access to the kids to make the man suffer by weaponising his love for and bond with the children. Fathers hardly do that.

Also, unlike women, men are usually more mature and more loving to prioritise the children's wellbeing and happiness over petty disputes, hard feelings, emotional grievances and vindictiveness against their spouses; they do not unnecessarily rope in the kids into any spite, neither do they weaponise them and the love and bond their spouses have for the kids. Hardly will you see a man poisoning his kids' minds against his spouse out of spite and vindictiveness. Men hardly do these things.


NB: No one should mention me. I don't have time.

This is interesting
The kind things we read on the net

yannisante:
Who be Isaac Fayose again

Fayose is a Yoruba name anybody can answer it.

Who is he? If he cannot take care of his own kids then he he shouldn't generalise and mind his business

RodgersAkpafu:

This is interesting
The kind things we read on the net

Despite telling people not to mention me, you couldn't resist.

This guy looks like R231

Karemarealty288:
That woman is irresponsible and cannot take care of the children, he can give her unlimited access to visit them but taking care of them is what she is built for

and you think the black and white man wey dey say good morning for night can take good care of those children. Efcc matter dey more important for am oh.

Karemarealty288:
That woman is irresponsible and cannot take care of the children, he can give her unlimited access to visit them but taking care of them is what she is built for

how do you know this? What is the difference between you and the mentally unstable ffk who made this allegation?

Frigga13:


Guess that’s how your mom raised you and your siblings..

Yoruba human.

You for no add Yoruba .... that guy and his family are rejected but the omoluabis.

FfK give Precious her eggs

Advocate500:
how do you know this? What is the difference between you and the mentally unstable ffk who made this allegation?

No difference sir ... they are same

Martinez39s:
SMH. Let the children stay with the father. The mother can visit.

is that how you were raised?

if the man feels he can stand on both duties then let him be when the kids grow up they would come and see their mom at their own will without restrictions



Anyway, Agriculture is life.

Most of the people throwing words around here are not interested on what becomes of those children, they are only interested in this topic because of the tribal colouration. My tribe against your tribe.

Martinez39s:
SMH. Let the children stay with the father. The mother can visit.

Is that how your mother visited you when you were staying with your father... Useful id-ots everywhere.

Ockra007:
What's the big deal if the children stay with the father, provided he gets all the necessary requirements for them and allow their mother to visit them??
What if those children were born in the United States and taken away from the mother by the government as a result of a reported abuse??
It's better to respect people's decision about their personal life. Some issues are more complicated than how they are reported to you by some of these Bloggers.

You think the mother of the kids have no say on how her own kids should be raised?
Court will decide anyway.

And you are responsible?

Karemarealty288:
That woman is irresponsible and cannot take care of the children, he can give her unlimited access to visit them but taking care of them is what she is built for

Men can also raise their own children. FFK should take those kids abroad and give them the life their mother can never give them.

As someone who aspires to be a single dad, I support FFK keeping the kids.

Lightway:


Shut up

The woman is jobless. How will she take care of four children

Telling him/her to shut up is very uncalled-for BTW were you the one feeding her now, Why the stupid man no wan dey for the upkeep of the children.... And Precious is not even asking for upkeep...
Learn how to call a spade a spade e get Why.

Newboss:
Men can also raise their own children. FFK should take those kids abroad and give them the life their mother can never give them.

As someone who aspires to be a single dad, I support FFK keeping the kids.

Please You are not making sense.

Lightway:


Shut up

The woman is jobless. How will she take care of four children

she is not jobless as she has her clitocurrency to assist her. But ffk should be with d kids.

MPESA:



Please You are not making sense.

You are not either.

Ockra007:
What's the big deal if the children stay with the father, provided he gets all the necessary requirements for them and allow their mother to visit them??
What if those children were born in the United States and taken away from the mother by the government as a result of a reported abuse??
It's better to respect people's decision about their personal life. Some issues are more complicated than how they are reported to you by some of these Bloggers.

I doubt if you have tried the said Abroad before vomiting trash.

Jobless people everywhere

Dis dwarf has to do a video to make a point

Husband and wife and having issues and you delving into matters you never knew how, when or where it started.

This is one of the things that gets Kim Jon Hun angry

Karemarealty288:
That woman is irresponsible and cannot take care of the children, he can give her unlimited access to visit them but taking care of them is what she is built for

See how you just messed up yourself. You want to make judgment on a woman you don't know, you just know she's Ibo that's it, but God made you step all over yourself in your post, talking upside down and downside up at the same time.