trustman:


I'm beginning to think that you guys may be possessed by the "Spirit of Python".
Your actions are gradually exposing your inside.
My assessment of you guys is being confirmed.
We'll soon know who's what.

Is this a confirmation that you are agnostic? Did the spirit of divinition spoke the truth to Paul?

vooks:

Hello busybody

Tokens of liars. How are you descendant of nimrod?

BusyBody Bidam, extremely idlelatrous

Bidam:
Tokens of liars. How are you descendant of nimrod?

Gombs, I'm lost o, since you're using a PC, kindly open Midas touch II thread, take your time post all the chapters there, then provide the link here, so that folks can continue from that one

it's just a suggestion

vooks:
BusyBody Bidam, extremely idlelatrous

A super lazy son of belial.

vooks:
your reasons for NOT offering Firstfruits, too embarrassing to be shared publicly? You poured your guts out in the tithing debate. Helped thousands. Why shy away from this?

You talk too much for a man. You're free to your opinions on what i do. I'm not under any obligations to answer to you. The tithe thread had its story and reason. i don't know how you managed to arrive at figures of the thousands i helped, do you work for the Nigerian government? You share a knack for churning out stuff from the nostrils.

Image123:
You talk too much for a man.
You're free to your opinions on what i do.
I'm not under any obligations to answer to you. The tithe thread had its story and reason.
i don't know how you managed to arrive at figures of the thousands i helped, do you work for the Nigerian government?
You share a knack for churning out stuff from the nostrils.

^^^
Say, this is rich coming from you.

You are under no obligation to share your faith,especially the embarrassing aspects of the same. I agree, but you have double rights to being ashamed over the same.

Thousands are from the views of the thread. There was much to learn from the (non)sense you spewed in a spirited defense of man made traditions chief among them that they are indefensible

Image123:




You talk too much for a man. You're free to your opinions on what i do. I'm not under any obligations to answer to you. The tithe thread had its story and reason. i don't know how you managed to arrive at figures of the thousands i helped, do you work for the Nigerian government? You share a knack for churning out stuff from the nostrils.

Busy boy is still here churning out garbage

Bidam:
A super lazy son of belial.

vooks:
Busy boy is still here churning out garbage

You just confirmed how super lazy you are.Run along puppy.

Ok, am a dog

Bidam:
You just confirmed how super lazy you are.Run along puppy.

vooks:
BabaGnoni was sarcastic in the only thread that was ever produced by another dumbo Gombs.
Burden of proof remains with the one making a claim so Trustman or whoever silence is no proof of nothing. Logic 101. I have been called Shndemidemi here by Gombs and I felt like I could not dignify his low IQ by refuting or agreeing with him. Silence means a lot more than guilt sir!

Okay, i think i have some time to play today, unfortunately for many. So pardon that i'm going back to my mentions to deal with them more appropriately. Gnoni asked that we shelf this and others talked about thread focus etc, that's why i ignored it. But we all saw that he started finding it easier to breathe threatenings on whoever talked about the matter further, instead of simply accepting or denying the claim. i really do not understand why a christian would be threatening when accused either falsely or truly. Some people do this when their men of God and pastors are accused or spoken against, and we should discourage that. Jesus wasn't busy threatening when accused.
Gnoni wasn't sarcastic in that thread, he was just being himself. That's the way he usually writes. Burden of proof is not with anybody. Two people Bidam and Mbaemeka witnessed it, the reedlord guy also confirmed it. Trustman was in that thread and Sisterme, and i also recall the exchanges howbeit faintly. That was the time Sisterme was busy opening up contentious threads and promoting William Braham, i contributed in some but largely read/skimmed through most of it. Gnoni is not denying it, i don't know why. i hope it is on christian reasons, not because there is some evidence somewhere or an inclination to repeat it. We are waiting for drumb to open the thread he claimed he would. Again, quit the insults. You can intelligently discuss with others, yes you can.

WinsomeX:


Listen to me Image123, let me explain to you why you need to grow up and grow up real fast in your thinking. There are such things as damnable heresies: 1Tim 4:1ff and there are such things as doctrines or practices that do not matter in Christendom: ROM 14:1ff.

We don't need this lecture, do we? We just need Gnoni to man up to his beliefs or is it former beliefs. It is a simple issue of honesty and plainness, and moving forward. i don't care the class of heresy it falls under. It's a simple thing. Someone said Gnoni did A, Gnoni didn't deny. But his followers are demanding proof or fire. Proof has come and gone, it came in the form of witnesses.

What most WoF people teach, glorifying money and materialism, teaching they are gods, invoking cultic practices into Christianity, etc, see the WoF thread, are damnable heresies. THOSE WHO BELIEVE THEM WILL GO TO HELL!

What again has this got to do with WoF? Is Gnoni WoF?

Now if for a second BBG taught somewhere on this forum that Eve slept with the Serpent/Satan, the question is how does this translate to damnable heresy? how does it affect the Christian faith? The matter is as matter for conjecture. Just like many here who choose to read into scripture what scripture didn't say, he too might have seen it in that light. The last I checked, it was William Braham who taught that doctrine and Hagin and the rest, teaching false doctrines themselves, were busy criticizing him. So that his children have followed in his footstep here.

A second indeed. See the shameless way you are trying to impress it on us that it is a light thing. Gnone taught it for more tthan a second. i am of the opinion that he still teaches it to himself. that is not just a second. What is all this talk about damnable heresy? Who determines what is damnable heresy and what is not, you? You assume uneasily that Gnoni "might have seen it in that light". i think that is darkness, not light. He didn't see that kind of thing in the light, NEVER.

You are the one who cares about Eve and Serpent. Ask him yourself. And he has told you how to ask, open a new thread. It is not a matter that should give you migraine headaches now.

i thought i said it earlier, i don't give a damn i know he said it.

WinsomeX:



If however any of the noise makers about Eve having sex with a Serpent are not man enough to open a separate thread to discuss it civilly with BBG by the end of today, I will open that thread at 9am tomorrow to begin a Q and A with BBG on the said doctrine. I will moderate the thread and God help any WoF symphatiser come there and spew any rubbish out and you will see me at my best.

EOD.

Gombs bro, please do the needful. We need the right gif for this. thanks.

WinsomeX:
]Bidam will have me apologize for calling his accusations his "inventions". Bidam, I apologize for calling it your invention. However since we do not have the quote where BBG made the alleged statement, I say this that though the accusation cannot be called an invention exactly, it is remains unverifiable and an allegation BC there is no quote on nl like that with BBG name on it.

If you called Bidam's allegations as his inventions, then you were wrong. They were not his but Gnoni's. It's okay for you to be sorry for being wrong. It is verifiable by witnesses and by Gnoni himself. You can ask Gnoni, yes you can.

Now, let me let us into this. I listened to a minister teach about Noah and that son of his that saw his unclothedness. The minister proved from that scripture that his son actually abused him sexually. Now some may believe this or they may choose not to; whichever way it is a theological point that has no relevance to the Christian life. That's the way I see the Eve had sex with serpent doctrine.

We don't need the way you see it. We need the thread you said you would open by 9am today. See your weak attempts to defend your boy. You would have done better with silence like your cohorts. Of course i'm not referring to tman BTW.

DrummaBoy, trustman and BabaGnoni, on the other hand, have so far on the WoF thread, discussed 16 damnable heresies in both doctrine and practices of the Word of Faith. Assuming for a second that BBG actually believes this doctrine of Eve had sex with a Serpent, that will make the scores 16 to 1, heading to 20 to 1. Even the 1 is unfounded, unverifiable, unrelated to the Christian stand in life or death and it's hopelessly baseless.

i checked your touted list. Guaranteed health, prosperity, tithing, seed faith for instance are in no way damnable heresies. What is with you and damnable heresies BTW? Who decides what is damnable heresy and what is not? There there you go again with your A SECOND assumptions, life is easier than this my guy. Simply ask the fellow. It is not a matter of scores, that is so classless and carnal. Unfortunately by your ranking, believing that Satan slept with Eve is a little thing, but tithes(which Jesus classed a minor part of the law) is a major thing for you and a damnable heresy. Who exactly is your Lord?

It is left to Bidam, Image123, mbaemeka, Gombs, and nlmediator to open a new thread and discuss the matter like responsible people would. An example has been set by the trio I listed above and the three of them have set out to discuss 20 reasons why the WoF doctrine is false. It will be the height of irresponsibility and sheer laziness if one or some of the five aforementioned WoF symphatizers cannot make out time to discuss a doctrine they feel is worth mentioning all the time, especially when they are under the heat.

Why discuss the matter? What is there to discuss? Whether if slept with Satan or Eve did not sleep with Satan. i'd rather be caught talking to the wall rubbish. Why should i open a thread to find out if Gnoni said what i know that he said? That is crazy. Others have confirmed that he said it.

I do not believe Eve slept with a serpent. If BBG believes it, I would love to hear his views on a separate thread. If he is wrong, its our duty to point it out to him like he does with WoF and I trust that he will repeal the doctrine.

Okay.

If however any of the noise makers about Eve having sex with a Serpent are not man enough to open a separate thread to discuss it civilly with BBG by the end of today, I will open that thread at 9am tomorrow to begin a Q and A with BBG on the said doctrine. I will moderate the thread and God help any WoF symphatiser come there and spew any rubbish out and you will see me at my best.

EOD.

Open the thread already na. i'm hoping to see you at your best at last. i hope you are not referring to behaving like a tout, throwing insults, losing all decorum, and behaving very unchristian as your best.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5tPFtbjZ2E


Dr Shammah Womack El

Why do some people still propagate the money religion?

vooks:
You just redefined busy. Too busy fending for your family yet you literally hang around NL lurking in the shadows. BUSY is an overused cliche by poor to low esteem suckaz trying to appear significant but I forgive you.

Trustman is a closet gay, transvestite and satanist. He sacrificed his twins last week on Friday.Take that to the nearest Den of thieves
Hope you can sleep and drop hallucinating now

i can relate with 'busy'. It is commonsense. One may easily read or even post/reply one or two lines or even more on a mobile device or at work or during traffic/transport. It is a little different front sitting at a computer, ready to open a thread or discuss at length as you would want to, with the colors, quotes, scripture search, links etc. It can apply to anyone.

Bidam:
Even as he talks rubbish on nairaland, the fool lacks sense and shows EVERYONE how stupid he is.

Brother, easy on the insults. Don't let them get to you or take something more precious from you than their cheap and often baseless criticisms.

trustman:


I'm beginning to think that you guys may be possessed by the "Spirit of Python".
Your actions are gradually exposing your inside.
My assessment of you guys is being confirmed.
We'll soon know who's what.

Baseless and useless assessments, i must say. What is the spirit of python? Don't bother, i don't care to know. What is with you guys and your extrabiblical practices and teaching? Yet if another does same, you would be in frontline condemning.

Rev 2:24 But unto you I say, and unto the rest in Thyatira, as many as have not this doctrine, and which have not known the depths of Satan, as they speak; I will put upon you none other burden.

vooks:


Here is your leader goD mbaemeka wishing me death

https://www.nairaland.com/1892195/truth-behind-christ-embassy-healing/33#27030827

To be fair, i read that link and i do not think mbaemeka wished you death. You've being busy trying to push him to the wall to the best of my knowledge. You always come up with snidely addressing him as god, having to ask him permission to die etc. i'm aware his church teaches that christians are gods according to Psalm 82 and John 10:34, and also the greater is He that is in me quote. But for you to at every opportunity try to logically force it and make unnecessary remarks. He simply left you to yourself. Like if you don't believe you can conquer death or escape death, then do the other side and stop bugging me. Anyway, na two of you get matter but that's what i saw their, no wishes.

Image123:


Baseless and useless assessments, i must say. What is the spirit of python? Don't bother, i don't care to know. What is with you guys and your extrabiblical practices and teaching? Yet if another does same, you would be in frontline condemning.

Rev 2:24 But unto you I say, and unto the rest in Thyatira, as many as have not this doctrine, and which have not known the depths of Satan, as they speak; I will put upon you none other burden.

Maybe you should ask your friend Bidam about 'The spirit of Python'. He's well versed in it.

trustman:


Maybe you should ask your friend Bidam about 'The spirit of Python'. He's well versed in it.

What part of "i don't care to know" do you not understand? Why are you still asking me to ask someone else about it?
Oh i see, you are trying to subtly do a parallel Gnoni stuff by blackmailing Bidam with this thread? i do not expect him to deny the thread or what he tried to teach there. We still await Gnoni's and perhaps your dumbness loosed in Jesus'name.

Image123,
I have been forced to conclude that some people here are kids in grownups' bodies but still I hold them responsible for EVERY idle word they shoot just like I m responsible for my posts. A few posts ago I wondered why you were posting Goshen360's thread with private information under the guise of helping him clean up. I was corrected by the actual culprit Gombs and I promptly apologized.

When mbaemeka whether by divination or meditation or hallucination makes outrageous claims, expect me to wave it in his face and I don't expect him or anybody else to be ashamed. He has claimed to be a goD and I have thoroughly tested that claim. Why is it a big deal if I refer him as goD? vooks is no goD but a mere man and I would be insane to throw tantrums over being called a man Next ludicrous claim is that EXCEPT/UNLESS he consents to Jesus plans to take him home, he ain't goin nowhere. So the only thing standing between him and immortality is his consent .

Why would he propose a violent way of checking out of this world for me? Was it out of love or a fit of infantile rage? He is a goD and you know power of death and life is in the tongue. He was clearly wishing me death. He went further and proposed death by suicide. I nearly died from the joke

And never forget they are ever reminding BabaGnoni of what he said back in April and they don't mind interjecting that in some totally unrelated threads. Am a fast learner and I just reciprocated their 'kindness' I must say that it is hard keeping up with them

Image123:


To be fair, i read that link and i do not think mbaemeka wished you death. You've being busy trying to push him to the wall to the best of my knowledge. You always come up with snidely addressing him as god, having to ask him permission to die etc. i'm aware his church teaches that christians are gods according to Psalm 82 and John 10:34, and also the greater is He that is in me quote. But for you to at every opportunity try to logically force it and make unnecessary remarks. He simply left you to yourself. Like if you don't believe you can conquer death or escape death, then do the other side and stop bugging me. Anyway, na two of you get matter but that's what i saw their, no wishes.

Image123:


What part of "i don't care to know" do you not understand? Why are you still asking me to ask someone else about it?
Oh i see, you are trying to subtly do a parallel Gnoni stuff by blackmailing Bidam with this thread? i do not expect him to deny the thread or what he tried to teach there. We still await Gnoni's and perhaps your dumbness loosed in Jesus'name.

Blackmail?
I'm not disappointed at your 'brilliance', not at all.
Cogratullations on your dazzling deduction!

It's commonsense that if you keep on replying to your mention then you are not too busy for NL. Or may be you are addicted. That's all I meant

Image123:


i can relate with 'busy'. It is commonsense. One may easily read or even post/reply one or two lines or even more on a mobile device or at work or during traffic/transport. It is a little different front sitting at a computer, ready to open a thread or discuss at length as you would want to, with the colors, quotes, scripture search, links etc. It can apply to anyone.

Image123,

Ok. Let's do it.

Let me start with the thread I promised to open to discuss with BabaGnoni (B). I had said I would open a thread which none of you could open t[b]o discuss Eve/Serpent/Sex with him[/b]. It occured to me later that to enter such a discussion I should ask nicely first, like we mostly do here on this forum. B has seen the request and will respond when he is ready. I will wait till then. Until then, it is fine if you continue to discuss the matter in a rabid manner, using it as a means to evade cogent discussions especially when you have run out of thoughts to defend your positions. The discussion will start when he is ready... anyone that doesn’t like it that way should open their own thread or head for the expressway.

By the way, your friends have not told us[b] where the bible tells us to command angels.[/b]

You also still have one of your friends here whose motto in life is to be anywhere where the money is. It reminds me of 50 cents' "Get money or die trying..." philosophy.

What about the one who terms himself[b] a mediator[/b] here but is as bias as bias can be, who cannot explain to us why his idol, Hagin, was laughing hysterically in a video like one on his way to Yaba left.

Shall we forget the early days of WoF revelations when the kiddo in your midst affirmed with E W Kenyon that[b] there is no redemption in the cross. [/b]

Or is it the confusion of Paul rebuking Peter before "them all", which meant a private rebuke [/b]before leaders only. You know, the way C[b]hristian Oyakhilome rebuked his wife in a stormy London meeting. A rebuke that opened him to a divorce proceeding. A private rebuke before leaders indeed.

And Bidam, ah, lest I forget: Jesus was a Pharisee!

You, my friend Image123, have very well avoided controversies only that you think that Paul who "withstood" Peter should not be called a rebuke. To withstand is less embarrassing than to rebuke.

If you search my own threads well, you may find my own minor gaffes too because that's the way all the above should be seen. But hypocrites will keep the log in their eyes and be groping in the dark to removd a speck in B eyes.

What I have written is not a justification for teaching damnable heresies, like Jesus died spiritually (JDS). That's the purpose of the very commendable WoF thread. There is a place for that.

Stay tuned for the discussiin with B... coming soon!

WinsomeX:
Image123,

Ok. Let's do it.

Let me start with the thread I promised to open to discuss with BabaGnoni (B). I had said I would open a thread which none of you could open to discuss Eve/Serpent/Sex with him. It occured to me later that to enter such a discussion I should ask nicely first, like we mostly do here on this forum. B has seen the request and will respond when he is ready. I will wait till then. Until then, it is fine if you continue to discuss the matter in a rabid manner, using it as a means to evade cogent discussions especially when you have run out of thoughts to defend your positions. The discussion will start when he is ready... anyone that doesn’t like it that way should open their own thread or head for the expressway.

This is a happening after the order of COZA. Nice man asking nicely, then going ahead to wish people expressway death , vooks, take note of this man.

By the way, your friends have not told us where the bible tells us to command angels.

You also still have one of your friends here whose motto in life is to be anywhere where the money is. It reminds me of 50 cents' "Get money or die trying..." philosophy.

What about the one who terms himself a mediator here but is as bias as bias can be, who cannot explain to us why his idol, Hagin, was laughing hysterically in a video like one on his way to Yaba left.

Shall we forget the early days of WoF revelations when the kiddo in your midst affirmed with E W Kenyon that there is no redemption in the cross.

Or is it the confusion of Paul rebuking Peter before "them all", which meant a private rebuke before leaders only. You know, the way Christian Oyakhilome rebuked his wife in a stormy London meeting. A rebuke that opened him to a divorce proceeding. A private rebuke before leaders indeed.

And Bidam, ah, lest I forget: Jesus was a Pharisee!

What is all these?

You, my friend Image123, have very well avoided controversies only that you think that Paul who "withstood" Peter should not be called a rebuke. To withstand is less embarrassing than to rebuke.

Eeyah, you are looking for my mistake. Look for Jesus, or the Kingdom of God, or something better. i schooled you on that passage, instead of you to say thank you, this is the coins you want to you to pay me. Sorry, i don't take coins, i'm not cheap.

If you search my own threads well, you may find my own minor gaffes too because that's the way all the above should be seen. But hypocrites will keep the log in their eyes and be groping in the dark to removd a speck in B eyes.

The SPECK? Have you seen the speckkkk?

What I have written is not a justification for teaching damnable heresies, like Jesus died spiritually (JDS). That's the purpose of the very commendable WoF thread. There is a place for that.

i've never heard that doctrine all my life, and i do not intend to even. Gnoni preached something similar too.

Stay tuned for the discussiin with B... coming soon!

For that ye ought to say, If the Lord will, we shall live, and do this, or that.

Image123:

This is a happening after the order of COZA. Nice man asking nicely, then going ahead to wish people expressway death , vooks, take note of this man.

Your trademark. Leaving issues to pursue irrelevance. I said a lot more than expressway there yiu know butYes, if not the expressway, try the well.

Image123:
What is all these?

Read it again. It's written in English and does not require a lot to comprehend.

Image123:
Eeyah, you are looking for my mistake. Look for Jesus, or the Kingdom of God, or something better. i schooled you on that passage, instead of you to say thank you, this is the coins you want to you to pay me. Sorry, i don't take coins, i'm not cheap.

Schooled. So much for schooling. Thank you for the "schooling" it was not helpful.

Image123:
The SPECK? Have you seen the speckkkk?

Remove the log in your eyes and then you will realize it's just a speckkkk.

Image123:
i've never heard that doctrine all my life, and i do not intend to even. Gnoni preached something similar too.

Let me help you with a link, it will help.

https://www.nairaland.com/1790500/word-faith-movements-doctrine-proponents/5#24701718

Image123:
For that ye ought to say, If the Lord will, we shall live, and do this, or that.

This I agree with you. I shall open the thread by tge grace of God... coming soon.

Image123:


Brother, easy on the insults. Don't let them get to you or take something more precious from you than their cheap and often baseless criticisms.

Bro... I get your point but the problem is if you do not answer a fool according to his folly, he will think he is wise in his own eyes.

You can see i have already sheath my sword long ago despite their bickerings. Thanks.

WinsomeX:


Your trademark. Leaving issues to pursue irrelevance. I said a lot more than expressway there yiu know butYes, if not the expressway, try the well.

This is preposterous You want me to leave the comforts of a bore-hole water and jump into a well? Vooks, vooooooooooooooooooooooooooooks.
Winx, you were trying to explain why you failed to do what you said you would do. Your conclusion is simply after the COZA order, if you don't get that, well, you don't get that.

Read it again. It's written in English and does not require a lot to comprehend.

i mean what is all that in the context of what i'm telling you? You left my issues with you to pursue irrelevance at neck breaking speed.

Schooled. So much for schooling. Thank you for the "schooling" it was not helpful.

Let me do revision for you, like bfore exams. i made that post 11:33pm October 23. You posted on this same thread 1:06am On Oct 24 and till date. You and most of your fellows avoided replying that post like a plague, and stopped your previous baseless assertions about the passage. You should thank God for sending me your way.

Remove the log in your eyes and then you will realize it's just a speckkkk.

The question was "Have you seen the speckkkk?"

Let me help you with a link, it will help.

https://www.nairaland.com/1790500/word-faith-movements-doctrine-proponents/5#24701718

i don't need such useless helps.

This I agree with you. I shall open the thread by tge grace of God... coming soon.

COZA COZA VIA DOLAROSA

When mbaemeka whether by divination or meditation or hallucination makes outrageous claims, expect me to wave it in his face and I don't expect him or anybody else to be ashamed. He has claimed to be a goD and I have thoroughly tested that claim. Why is it a big deal if I refer him as goD? vooks is no goD but a mere man and I would be insane to throw tantrums over being called a man. Next ludicrous claim is that EXCEPT/UNLESS he consents to Jesus plans to take him home, he ain't goin nowhere. So the only thing standing between him and immortality is his consent .

Dear Misdirected groupie,

I know you convulse any time I fail to reply all the mentions you give me in a day. I would have felt the same way if I was this infatuated about a faceless moniker on NL. I would have loved to keep throwing the occasional jabs with you and reminding you of your numerous goofs, chief of which would be "Jesus didn't take his blood to the most holy place in heaven and there is nothing like without shedding of blood there is no remission of sins" but I would be dumbing myself down to engage with you. Unlike you, and the idiotic way you employ strawman's, figments of your poor imagination and facetious hyperboles, I am willing to discuss what I believe from the bible with copious references to buttress them. While I am certain that you may not agree with my interpretations (majorly because you are an ignoramus- scripturally and otherwise), you would not be able to gainsay that the words will be written in black and white for even someone with your level of intelligence to comprehend.

YES, I am a GOD. I am not a GOD over GOD neither am I one over my fellow men. But I am a GOD over the Devil, his cohorts and his works. I am a GOD over the principles and elements that this fallen world is governed by and I make no apologies for it. If you take me up on this (and I am in the mood) I would teach you from the scriptures and expect your pusillanimity to rear its very ugly bighead. Sadly, I cannot say the same for you and most of those of your ilk (the ilk of the misinformed). You offer no alternatives and like hypocritical yet ignorant churls, you insist that something is wrong because it is wrong and not because you know what is right. You are the one's who freely express how satan is the GOD of this world and even quote the scriptures that suggest so but I do not see you ask the bible or the devil himself how many planets he has created, yet when I say I am satan's God you start asking me moronic (borrowing your own words) questions like how many planets I have created. All such reasoning only betrays you for who you really are-a scripturally handicapped troll and I would do well to avoid you.

FYI I am not irked that you call me goD or what not. As you can see, I have gone many steps ahead of you by capitalizing the 'god' so you can ride on with your off-color jokes and snide remarks. What I do not appreciate is the endless mentions and lies like alleging that I said Jesus will have to Kneel and BEG for my consent to take me home or like the other failed writer and blogger claimed that "my life's motto is to be anywhere the money is" this is after I said true spiritual maturity entails submitting to the will of God and how that money follows me wherever I go.

I know you both have the memory of a formatted Z2 so I would try to do the impossible, by re-quoting myself for the sake of posterity and somehow hoping you both grasp what I said.

Jesus is with the keys of hell and of death now and for us Christians he reserves the right to call us home. Yet he doesn't do it without our consent (he is that kind).

My location: anywhere the money is

So if you want to quote me, you should at least do so exactly without forcing my posts to say what you want it to say after all, I am responsible for what I say and not how you choose to interpret it. Knowing who you are I expect you to evade all I have said and then ask me to show you where you claimed Paul rebuked Peter in Galatia. I have done so before and I would so again for posterity's sake:

Does it bother you that Paul had no qualms publicizing this event long after it occurred to the Galatia commoners?

Your exact words ^^^^ and I was even courteous enough by telling you to rephrase the above thus:

"Does it bother you that Paul had no qualms publicizing this event to the Galatia commoners long after it occurred in Antioch

Now I expect you to ignore your own quote and then wait for the next 2 pages to pass before you resume asking me for the same post and claiming that I lied against you.

PS: Thanks to Bidam and Lordreed for vindicating me. Special thanks too to Image123 for impartially yet rightfully interpreting my posts. What more can I say about brother Gombs? God bless you all real good.