Abagworo:
In his letter Justice Inyang Okoro accussed Amaechi of visiting him on 1st of February 2016 to influence judgement on Rivers election but alas the judgement had already been passed as at 27th January. It is such a shame that a supreme court Judge lied without covering his tracks well.

I don't think I've quoted you before. But this thread doesn't show you to be intelligent.

Even that of Abia was orchestrated by APC. The information leaked. Not everything is meant for the media. besides, Bribery is the least of things politicians do to win elections.



This thread is needless.

MaziOmenuko:
Comprehension was thought in secondary schools. You really skipped those classes, now it's haunting you.



Read the last paragraph of the letter you attached:the judge was making reference to a verbal complaint he made on the 1st of February. Amaechi's visit did not take place on 1st February, rather, what took place on said date was a conversation.

If I reported you to your mum on the 1st of February, telling her that you skipped waec English exam, does it mean that the exam did take place on the 1st of February?

Not holding brief for anyone, but stop misrepresenting facts.

Let's examine this critically.
Amaechi visited him b4 the 27th of January and he only reported the matter to the CJ on 1st February-5 days after delivery judgement on the case, right?

That's fair enough

4dor:


Smart Alec, the real question is why was he just making a verbal report on the 1st of February? Why didn't he complain immediately to the NJC? While you're at it, why didn't we hear this story before his arrest? I agree with you the guy you quoted has comprehension issues but it still doesn't take anything away from Okoro's faulty logic.

Open your own thread and ask those questions, stop derailing this thread. This thread is about the date Justice Okoro made a verbal report vs thebdatebhe was visited by amaechi.

MaziOmenuko:


Open your own thread and ask those questions, stop derailing this thread. This thread is about the date Justice Okoro made a verbal report vs thebdatebhe was visited by amaechi.

I'm happy to know I struck the right nerve.

ayindejimmy:


Let's examine this critically.
Amaechi visited him b4 the 27th of January and he only reported the matter to the CJ on 1st February-5 days after delivery judgement on the case, right?

That's fair enough

Spot on!

ayindejimmy:


Let's examine this critically.
Amaechi visited him b4 the 27th of January and he only reported the matter to the CJ on 1st February-5 days after delivery judgement on the case, right?

That's fair enough

There are 2 issues here. He included Abia in the letter while Abia APC had no case.

4dor:


Smart Alec, the real question is why was he just making a verbal report on the 1st of February? Why didn't he complain immediately to the NJC? While you're at it, why didn't we hear this story before his arrest? I agree with you the guy you quoted has comprehension issues but it still doesn't take anything away from Okoro's faulty logic.

Smart Alec you. Between Jan 27th when the judgement was delivered and Feb 1st when the verbal complain was made is how many days?
Besides that he didn't report the same day Amaechi visited doesn't make him a liar, we should rather be concerned with if actually Amaechi visited and what transpired.

kutchs:

Smart Alec you. Between Jan 27th when the judgement was delivered and Feb 1st when the verbal complain was made is how many days?
Besides that he didn't report the same day Amaechi visited doesn't make him a liar, we should rather be concerned with if actually Amaechi visited and what transpired.

Yes, it doesn't make him a liar but in doing that he has breached the ICPC act section 23 (1). You can read subsection 2 and 3 too. Breaching this law has a punishment of two years imprisonment.

No matter how you spin this my brother, Okoro is in big trouble.

Some of U are becoming so pathetic in ur staunch support/defence of some of these ppl dat it begs to wonder if you ppl actually earn a living from it. Hypocrisy has actually usurped common sense these days. If an allegation against someone from the opposition is brought up, we raise our voices to the high heavens in our new hypocritical roles of judge jury and executioner but if d same comes up against anyone from the ruling class, some of us are so shameless to actually to find loopholes in the said allegations and in other cases even go as far as defending such when it becomes crystal clear.

Abagworo, chai Mazi don finish you.
See as you come resemble illiterate like me.

pedestal82:
Abagworo, chai Mazi don finish you.
See as you come resemble illiterate like me.

I don't get. The Judge lied clearly with point 1 debatable and point 2 undebatable. Abia APC had no case at the supreme court.

ndcide:


I don't think I've quoted you before. But this thread doesn't show you to be intelligent.

Even that of Abia was orchestrated by APC. The information leaked. Not everything is meant for the media. besides, Bribery is the least of things politicians do to win elections.



This thread is needless.

APGA is not APC and they are no partners. The Abia case is PDP infighting as the APGA candidate was even a PDP member. Nothing links APC with anything in Abia State.

MaziOmenuko:
Comprehension was thought in secondary schools. You really skipped those classes, now it's haunting you.



Read the last paragraph of the letter you attached:the judge was making reference to a verbal complaint he made on the 1st of February. Amaechi's visit did not take place on 1st February, rather, what took place on said date was a conversation.

If I reported you to your mum on the 1st of February, telling her that you skipped waec English exam, does it mean that the exam did take place on the 1st of February?

Not holding brief for anyone, but stop misrepresenting facts.

From today i will only be reading comments here
Dunno some guys here are dullards

Tnx bro!

MaziOmenuko:
Comprehension was thought in secondary schools. You really skipped those classes, now it's haunting you.



Read the last paragraph of the letter you attached:the judge was making reference to a verbal complaint he made on the 1st of February. Amaechi's visit did not take place on 1st February, rather, what took place on said date was a conversation.

If I reported you to your mum on the 1st of February, telling her that you skipped waec English exam, does it mean that the exam did take place on the 1st of February?

Not holding brief for anyone, but stop misrepresenting facts.

Oga u go school oh....I just dey wonder wetin that guy dey talk b4..... simple comprehension sef

Abagworo:


There is equally that of Abia State that had no APC case. The case of Nyerere Anyim was struck out at tribunal stsge and he never went for appeal nor supreme court. It is 2 evidences here with one being arguable and the other unarguable. It is 100% lie in the case of Abia.

go get some brain !

Abagworo:
In his letter Justice Inyang Okoro accussed Amaechi of visiting him on 1st of February 2016 to influence judgement on Rivers election but alas the judgement had already been passed as at 27th January. It is such a shame that a supreme court Judge lied without covering his tracks well.

I read both posts, and sadly, they are unconnected. You should have thought about it thoroughly before you created this thread. One is indeed the date a delivered judgement was reported while the other was the date a judge made a complaint to another judge. The missing date was the date the complainant met the accused which would have made sense to your plight, but is not in either posts.

4dor:


Smart Alec, the real question is why was he just making a verbal report on the 1st of February? Why didn't he complain immediately to the NJC? While you're at it, why didn't we hear this story before his arrest? I agree with you the guy you quoted has comprehension issues but it still doesn't take anything away from Okoro's faulty logic.

What do you mean 'report immediately'?
Did he report at an unfit date?
He has a reliable alibi and that's all the law needs. Your retort on timing is off-target.

DesChyko:


What do you mean 'report immediately'?
Did he report at an unfit date?
He has a reliable alibi and that's all the law needs. Your retort on timing is off-target.

do you really know the meaning of the word 'alibi'? not even the learned CJN can come to the court without a documented evidence of that call Okoro claimed he made to him which is even not an admissible evidence in any lawcourt. He must proof beyond doubt that Amaechi tried to bribe him or he would be jailed. All we want is where did Okoro get the money caught with him at home? A judge should be able to answer such a simple question not muddling things up and spewing trash soothing to illiterate Igbos .

Babacele:
do you really know the meaning of the word 'alibi'? not even the learned CJN can come to the court without a documented evidence of that call Okoro claimed he made to him which is even not an admissible evidence in any lawcourt. He must proof beyond doubt that Amaechi tried to bribe him or he would be jailed. All we want is where did Okoro get the money caught with him at home? A judge should be able to answer such a simple question not muddling things up and spewing trash soothing to illiterate Igbos .

How do the IPOB being soothed come into the judge's claims, his case with the DSS, the CJN and the accused.
Pray tell.
Secondly, tell me of what value an evidence is to the media now as opposed to the court of law.
Finally, define an 'alibi' according to law. I await.

Abagworo:
In his letter Justice Inyang Okoro accussed Amaechi of visiting him on 1st of February 2016 to influence judgement on Rivers election but alas the judgement had already been passed as at 27th January. It is such a shame that a supreme court Judge lied without covering his tracks well.

abagworo, do you have problem with comprehension?
Meanwhile, we are waiting for you in the owerri bad roads thread

DesChyko:


How do the IPOB being soothed come into the judge's claims, his case with the DSS, the CJN and the accused.
Pray tell.
Secondly, tell me of what value an evidence is to the media now as opposed to the court of law.
Finally, define an 'alibi' according to law. I await.

I'm answering your questions ascendingly.

1. First, I bring 2 definitions of alibi .
pronunciation
(America) (IPA): /ˈæl.ə.baɪ/
noun (plural alibis)
(legal) The plea or mode of defense under which a person on trial for a crime proves or attempts to prove that he was in another place when the alleged act was committed; as, to set up an alibi; to prove an alibi

The Criminal Law Deskbook (1988; ISBN 0820512176) states: "Alibi is different from all of the other defenses...it is based upon the premise that the defendant is truly innocent."

2. Second, I do not understand what you mean by " of what value an evidence is to the media now as opposed to the court of law" , or where I had referred to such gibberish in my post.

3. It is only an ipob , an unthinking hate filled degenerate, that would believe a legal authority ,an arbiter, with so many years of experience in the knowledge of the power of documented evidence as the key to truth when he talks like an uneducated tomato seller . no recorder , video, no recorded phone call a day after amaechi had left to play along in order to safe a rainy day as this? una no dey lie.

Babacele:
I'm answering your questions ascendingly.

1. First, I bring 2 definitions of alibi .
pronunciation
(America) (IPA): /ˈæl.ə.baɪ/
noun (plural alibis)
"Alibi is different from all of the other defenses...it is based upon the premise that the defendant is truly innocent."

Honestly, I was expecting you to give me something off your head. But no biggie. An alibi is simply an evidence that proves his innocence. And the best part of it is, he's got the CJN as a witness to that alibi. And you say a recorded call is not admissible evidence? In every case? I think not

2. Second, I do not understand what you mean by " of what value an evidence is to the media now as opposed to the court of law" , or where I had referred to such gibberish in my post.

It's nice you perceive parading evidence on media is gibberish. You were asking after evidence which would have better value in the law courts than on newspaper pages; thus my question. I can understand the antics of the EFCC/DSS of playing prosecutor on newspaper pages is getting to your sense of order.

3. It is only an ipob , an unthinking hate filled degenerate, that would believe a legal authority ,an arbiter, with so many years of experience in the knowledge of the power of documented evidence as the key to truth when he talks like an uneducated tomato seller . no recorder , video, no recorded phone call a day after amaechi had left to play along in order to safe a rainy day as this? una no dey lie.

Thank you for this piece of information. However, my question is 'How does the IPOB being soothed by his revelations help the case before him? You implied that this information is to appease the IPOB. Is he under trial before the IPOB or is he arrested by them? Explain please.

DesChyko:


Honestly, I was expecting you to give me something off your head. But no biggie. An alibi is simply an evidence that proves his innocence. And the best part of it is, he's got the CJN as a witness to that alibi. And you say a recorded call is not admissible evidence? In every case? I think not



It's nice you perceive parading evidence on media is gibberish. You were asking after evidence which would have better value in the law courts than on newspaper pages; thus my question. I can understand the antics of the EFCC/DSS of playing prosecutor on newspaper pages is getting to your sense of order.


Thank you for this piece of information. However, my question is 'How does the IPOB being soothed by his revelations help the case before him? You implied that this information is to appease the IPOB. Is he under trial before the IPOB or is he arrested by them? Explain please.

You wan finish the zombie gentlemanly .

Justice Okoro letter has set the zombies camp on fire.

After an all midnight brain storm on how to diffuse the fire, they came up with concocted trash devoid of all basic comprehension skill.

I can see a mother of zombie peeping, maybe she will add further to the stupidity of the thread

Some people failed to read between lines

odiks:
By Ugochukwu Nnamdi Ukamba

I had seen Hon. Justice Inyang Okoro’s letter to His Lordship, Mahmud Mohammed, Mahmud Mohammed, the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) and decided to ‘unlook’ because I try to restrict my engagement on social media to discussing issues and not people.

‎A good friend tagged me on a thread that was discussing the issue ostensibly to get my attention and perhaps elicit my opinion which she had considered ‘pedestrian’ on another thread discussing the DSS actions. I am not afraid to offer pedestrian opinions because one day those opinions will mature and ‘take flight’.‎

‎His Lordship’s letter raises some concerns that I hope we have, shorn of our emotional and political reactions, directed our minds to. I do hope His Lordship sought the opinion of Counsel before writing or dispatching that letter because, unwittingly, he appears to have shot himself in the foot -I think he may have shot His Lordship, Mahmud Mohammed, the CJN also.‎

‎The concerns:

1. How has His Lordship carried himself in the discharge of his judicial functions that politicians are comfortable enough to sit with him to openly discuss the prospect of rigging the decisions of the Supreme Court? First, Mr. Rotimi came to His Lordship and thereafter Mr. Umana, in the presence of a ‘Pastor’, offered gratification. ‎(or was the visit the other way round?)

Maybe I am a little old school but I know that before now, it was unheard of that a judicial officer would be found in the same vicinity as a litigant (or person remotely connected to the litigant) in a pending litigation.

Except His Lordship is suggesting that politicians routinely visit all his other learned brothers to discuss pending matters, I don’t see how that is a brilliant excuse for his current travails.

2. So politicians walked into His Lordship’s home, offered him a bribe to secure his assistance to influence a decision that might be assigned to him and His Lordship’s best response was ‘it doesn’t lie within my power to grant your request’. The law resides in His Lordship’s bosom and His Lordship knows or ought to know that the alleged conducts of Rotimi and Umanna amounted to criminal conducts contrary to sections 98A and 126 of the Criminal Code Act. The punishment in each of those sections are 7 years each. Had His Lordship complied with the provisions of our law and arrested (or caused to be arrested) the named politicians, the courts would have been able to try and sentence them appropriately. Our country would have been rid of at least two corrupt people for at least 14 years. No, His Lordship decided to ‘unlook’.

3. His Lordship said Mr. Rotimi also told him that he (Rotimi) had spoken with the CJN and that the CJN had agreed to make His Lordship a member of the panel that would hear the appeal. Inherent in that statement is the fact that Mr Rotimi has the power to influence the CJN’s decision. If Mr Rotimi was offering His Lordship money to get His Lordship on Rotimi’s side, would it be a far stretch to assume that Mr. Rotimi also offered the CJN money and perhaps the CJN accepted seeing that, according to His Lordship, the CJN had already agreed to do Mr. Rotimi’s bidding?

4. According to His Lordship, after this invidious attempt by politicians to ‘hijack’ justice, His Lordship only made ‘a verbal report’ of the incident to the CJN. Perhaps, over a light banter at dinner. We should all be collectively worried that a Justice of the Supreme Court (the final court of the land, the court with powers to uphold a death sentence on a human’s life) does not think that an incident, such as the grave allegations he has just made, is worthy of a formal petition to either the CJN or relevant law enforcement agencies. We should be more worried that these incidents allegedly happened in February 2016 and we are only just hearing of it in October -we perhaps would never have heard of it if His Lordship is not going through the present travails.‎

5. The, not-so-minor, reference of His Lordship to Mr. Rotimi trying to influence the outcome of the election appeal emanating from Abia State ‘at all cost’ is also very curious considering that Mr. Rotimi’s party wasn’t even part of the Abia Poll.

Perhaps this was a freudian slip.‎

‎Again, I do hope His Lordship sought legal counsel before writing this!

Ugochukwu Nnamdi Ukamba is a Legal Practitioner based in Lagos.

http://ynaija.com/re-justice-inyang-okoros-letter-lordship-shot-foot/

Barr. Ugochukwu thinks I am right.

DesChyko:


Honestly, I was expecting you to give me something off your head. But no biggie. An alibi is simply an evidence that proves his innocence. And the best part of it is, he's got the CJN as a witness to that alibi. And you say a recorded call is not admissible evidence? In every case? I think not



It's nice you perceive parading evidence on media is gibberish. You were asking after evidence which would have better value in the law courts than on newspaper pages; thus my question. I can understand the antics of the EFCC/DSS of playing prosecutor on newspaper pages is getting to your sense of order.


Thank you for this piece of information. However, my question is 'How does the IPOB being soothed by his revelations help the case before him? You implied that this information is to appease the IPOB. Is he under trial before the IPOB or is he arrested by them? Explain please.

Holy Mary! even after giving you the dictionary and legal meaning of alibi ,you still goofed? So if a person says he reported an incidence he claimed happened in the past to anybody , not the police as the constitution dictates, is an alibi ? for the CJN is anybody not recognized here unless you can bring an official letter written by Okoro as at the time of the incidence to the office of CJN copying the police , SSS etc, and the reactions of these legally recognized bodies inform of prompt investigation eg tracing Amaechis's phone's GPS within the said hours which are not even evidence of an alleged bribery. So if Justice Okoro has such cases before him and one of the parties says he told a bicycle repairer instead of the police about a supposedly serious incident which has huge future legal implications, Justice Okoro will admit such ipobic claim as an evidence? Jeeeezus! I'm just wasting time with you.

Babacele:
Holy Mary! even after giving you the dictionary and legal meaning of alibi ,you still goofed? So if a person says he reported he reported an incidence he claimed happened in the past to anybody as an alibi ?for the CJN is anybody not recognized here unless you can bring an official letter written by Okoro as at the time of the incidence to the office of CJN copying the police , SSS etc, and reactions of these legally recognized bodies inform of prompt investigation eg tracing Anarchist's phone's GPS within the said hours which are not even evidence of an alleged bribery.

Even photo or video like this one is nonexistent.

Abagworo:
In his letter Justice Inyang Okoro accussed Amaechi of visiting him on 1st of February 2016 to influence judgement on Rivers election but alas the judgement had already been passed as at 27th January. It is such a shame that a supreme court Judge lied without covering his tracks well.

Go school u no gree go? The judge said he reported to the CJN Verbally on that day, 1st feb! He didn't say they visited him, read and understand before u comment

See letter http://www.socialtimesng.com/2016/10/judges-raid-minister-amaechi-umana-indicted-in-bribery-deals-as-justice-inyang-okokon-writes-cjn-letter/

Babacele:
Holy Mary! even after giving you the dictionary and legal meaning of alibi ,you still goofed? So if a person says he reported he reported an incidence he claimed happened in the past to anybody as an alibi ?for the CJN is anybody not recognized here unless you can bring an official letter written by Okoro as at the time of the incidence to the office of CJN copying the police , SSS etc, and reactions of these legally recognized bodies inform of prompt investigation eg tracing Anarchist's phone's GPS within the said hours which are not even evidence of an alleged bribery.

I like how you answered the other time. It made you coherent. Three posts were made highlighting three different issues. Quote the one(s) you answered thus. And if I'm not mistaken, you are suggesting what an evidence which would appease your expectations would look like. That is also noted.

Kabashin:


You wan finish the zombie gentlemanly .

Hahaha.. I'm trying to understand what he's saying.

DesChyko:


I like how you answered the other time. It made you coherent. Three posts were made highlighting three different issues. Quote the one(s) you answered thus. And if I'm not mistaken, you are suggesting what an evidence which would appease your expectations would look like. That is also noted.

I ignored the last two because I had answered them in an earlier post and don't want to waste time on them again because u ain't reading but only manoeuvring round the questions to suit your poor mindset! Okay maybe I should be blunt . That letter written to the CJN by okoro few hours ago is as useless and worthless than the paper on which it is written before any law court! the CJN should acknowledge the receipt of such verbal complaint from Okoro ,and shamefully let him tell us what steps he took to protect law and justice when he got the okoro notice ,and where is his evidence . The CJN should tell us then that he is an accomplice after crime and fact! lmao!