kevoh:

Oh you noticed that too. Saw a lot of them in different buses along the Kubwa express way!

Saw then in wuse... I don't plan on visiting that area today.

MrMystrO:


What is this one saying? they've Now confirmed a total of 71 out of 103 Missiles were intercepted, and the Rest mostly hit evacuated destinations without any serious casualties so i wonder where you're getting that Garbage propaganda from. Get your facts right, Stop Watching CNN and stop being Brainwashed!!

only a third of the missiles fired at Syrian targets were intercepted... Not 71 out of 103. The tomahawk cruise missiles is not that easy to intercept.

After going through most of the comments on this topic, some are hilarious, ignorantly quipped and majority beclouded by sentiments. I found yours to be the most silly of all.

You appear to yourself, thinking you are well educated on matters beyond your comprehension,seemingly delusional to others in perception.

Haba, how can you come online and type all this romantic thoughts of yours on this space, expecting learned minds to flow along with you. The reasons quoted below for American invasion of countries is too shallow. Do more research bro.

All this hype about Russia fighting USA will be COLD WAR. have you ever seen two chicken taunting each other with hackles raised and all the fluff? That's the best they can do to each other.

greiboy:
You are more confused than i thought.

America invaded Afghanistan and Iraq because it was housing a group of Islamic radicals that declared war on America because of its support for Israel. Although, there is a conspiracy of chemical weapons hanging over the invasion of Iraq.

The population in Libya called for a regime change because they wanted a man that has ruled them for over Four decades to leave office, but he refused and started killing his own people, what happened next is now history

The Syrian regime is similar to Libya, nonetheless the is not the bone of contention in Syria. America was forced to join the war because of "the so called Islamic state" or Daish.


And Yes, there is a proxy war going on between Iran and Saudi Arabia for the soul of the middle east. The war is currently very visible in Yemen and Syria. It has nothing to do with America, but America might prefer the victory of Saudi Arabia though.

UDUJ:
It's really getting scary.

Latest developments indicate a Pro-Assad official says targeted bases were evacuated on Russian warning

Russia issues ominous warning of 'consequences' for US-led strike on Syria. And we all know Russia doesn't joke around

Fears already indicate the conflict could escalate.

The Kremlin do more of talking than action unlike my mentor, Donald J. trump . This is the 2nd time tomahawk missiles will be fired at Syria yet no significant military response from Syria greatest ally, Russia. Don't think Russia want any War atm... Cold War didn't end in Russia's favour.

greiboy:
Bro You took the proposal of Gaddafi seriously

The dollar is the main currency used for international trade for a reason.

Only the likes of China and European Union have the capacity to propose such changes because of the enormous trading power they hold, just like America

Gadadfi or Libya cannot change that. I will agree that America had Gaddafi in its black record before the airstrikes in Libya though.

Well said, Some years back during the fall in Oil price , did you know what was done by the US? they went( I believe you understand this as their corporations) to Saudi Arabia and had more exploration to flood the oil market which was mainly one to deter Russia's economy cus they also are major earners in Oil, it affects Nigeria as well to due to our myopic nature in geopolitics .

greatagain17:
only a third of the missiles fired at Syrian targets were intercepted... Not 71 out of 103. The tomahawk cruise missiles is not that easy to intercept.

hahahaha even your CNN acknowledged just now that MOST of the Missiles were intercepted. i just watched it now and i wish i took a picture of that statement. "Most" is Not one third my friend. Apparently, Russian anti cruise missile defense systems are pretty effective huh? Hahaha

poseidon12:


And you are happy, especially with your last statement?

ur analysis is accurate .only 30% of the missiles were neutralized by the Syrian military defense systems. The Americans have got the upper hand in missile system/military defense technology

May God take control.


Kindly help to retweet https://twitter.com/DavezoNigeria/status/975033755348951040


Thanks.

MrMystrO:


What News? CNN? BBC? FOX? Give me a break!

the videos of childern foaming in the mouth and struggling to breath?

fizzy4luv:
After going through most of the comments on this topic, some are hilarious, ignorantly quipped and majority beclouded by sentiments. I found yours to be the most silly of all.

You appear to yourself, thinking you are well educated on matters beyond your comprehension,seemingly delusional to others in perception.

Haba, how can you come online and type all this romantic thoughts of yours on this space, expecting learned minds to flow along with you. The reasons quoted below for American invasion of countries is too shallow. Do more research bro.

All this hype about Russia fighting USA will be COLD WAR. have you ever seen two chicken taunting each other with hackles raised and all the fluff? That's the best they can do to each other.

You appear to me as a nonentity, just picking on random comments to expose your ignorance..

Where did I suggest Russia fighting America will be cold war

Every tom, dick and harry trying to make sense of international politics

Do you know when America invaded Afghanistan at all? Wasn't it after Osama bin laden and his group of Islamic touts caused a ripple in international security on September 11 2001?

Do you know why America invaded Iraq, have you tried to study the geopolitics of the region for one second atall

Do you know why the Russian will die for Assad rather than have any American interest very close to its defense base?

Do you know why Iran is working over board to ensure Assad remain the president of Syria?


Do you understand America interest in Israel?


I will school you on international politics if necessary bro. I am not joking about that.

Wrong location!. I' am almost sure the US and allies didn't hit the right target. What the Syrian government does is keep them busy with fake targets, cause they know satellites are watching purported chemical manufactory sites from above. The allied forces then go and strike a fake location and Asaad laugh out loud. When you understand this, you'll understand why more chemical attacks would happen sooner or later.

Trump is a man of war

obonujoker:


That guy is a muslim, so he is anti US

Please do not toe the religious line. Every one is entitled to his/her opinion.

greatagain17:


The Kremlin do more of talking than action unlike my mentor, Donald J. trump . This is the 2nd time tomahawk missiles will be fired at Syria yet no significant military response from Syria greatest ally, Russia. Don't think Russia want any War atm... Cold War didn't end in Russia's favour.

Ohh Donald Trump Your Mentor? Is that why you're Arguing blindly on their behalf? Damn Why do i always have to be wasting my time arguing with people who don't even know the basics of international politics but blindly support based on sentimentality and Bandwagon Propaganda opinion. Donald Trump who despises all of your kind your mentor? Your case is a serious one. Please this conversation is over.

Did you ever bother to ask why you were not told the total number of missiles dropped?

Personally, I think it could be up to 100 or more. If that's the case, it means the targets were successfully hit over 80% of the time. Americans do not want war. Trump does not want war. But this is the second time this guy would allegedly use chemical weapons on his own citizens in just a year or two. That should get you worried. If you listened to the US ambassador to the UN, she said that folks are starting to normalize the use of chemical weapons and the UN council had been doing nothing about it due to Russia's obstruction.

Of course, I know that the coalition of Western Europe and Saudi Arabia may have a hidden agenda for wanting to remove Assad. But still, unchecked terror anywhere will soon spread everywhere.

So, again, learn to question what you're told.

MrMystrO:


What is this one even saying? Can't you Read? 13 Of their Missiles just got DESTROYED and you're here spitting gibberish. How do you think those missiles were destroyed? by Syrian air power alone? The era of US dominance is over and special Thanks to Vladmir Putin and Russia for making that happen. And if them try "Anyhow" them go see "Anyhow". THIS IS NOT LIBYA!!!

alienvirus:
Putin was not kidding either. Shutting down US weapons is enough response already.

13 Out Of More Than 100 Missiles Is Truly Enough Response...Thank U Sir

vanshwerz:


Well said, Some years back during the fall in Oil price , did you know what was done by the US? they went( I believe you understand this as their corporations) to Saudi Arabia and had more exploration to flood the oil market which was mainly one to deter Russia's economy cus they also are major earners in Oil, it affects Nigeria as well to due to our myopic nature in geopolitics .

Stop typing stuff from your head

The high prices encouraged fracking in America which was thought of as a very expensive way of extracting crude oil before that time.


The revolution of fracking in America meant it imported less oil from other countries.

America was the leading importer of crude oil before that time.

Even Nigeria was not left out because it exported majority of its oil to America before that time. This meant Nigeria had nowhere to sell its oil at that time. This lead to the laws of demand and supply to naturally take place and the high prices began to tumble

Now Saudi Arabia and other oil producers that can improve their capacity started producing more crude oil to make up for the shortfall in earnings.

adegeye38:
the videos of childern foaming in the mouth and struggling to breath?

Get me right, i don't dispute that a chemical attack happened, Not at all. What critical minds are saying is HOW ARE WE SURE that the attack was perpetrated by Asaad and the Syrian government against HIS OWN PEOPLE whom he's trying to bring together especially now that he's winning the war? Are we just supposed to believe that Asaad did it JUST BECAUSE the US said they did it, without providing any PROOF whatsoever? Common think too for once! Nobody wants these inhumane acts to happen but You can't believe something without PROOF just because someone said so.. its not Done!

boluwatife122:


13 Out Of More Than 100 Missiles Is Truly Enough Response...Thank U Sir

it has been confirmed a total of 71 missiles were intercepted out of 103. Get your facts Right!

KratosCorp:
Did you ever bother to ask why you were not told the total number of missiles dropped?

Personally, I think it could be up to 100 or more. If that's the case, it means the targets were successfully hit over 80% of the time. Americans do not want war. Trump does not want war. But this is the second time this guy would allegedly use chemical weapons on his own citizens in just a year or two. That should get you worried. If you listened to the US ambassador to the UN, she said that folks are starting to normalize the use of chemical weapons and the UN council had been doing nothing about it due to Russia's obstruction.

Of course, I know that the coalition of Western Europe and Saudi Arabia may have a hidden agenda for wanting to remove Assad. But still, unchecked terror anywhere will soon spread everywhere.

So, again, learn to question what you're told.

You should be the one to question what you're told. I'm glad you used the term "allegedly" to describe the chemical weapons use. However i want to ask u a question. Will you agree a man on the street accused of stealing be lynched when No EVIDENCE whatsoever can be provided that he stole anything, or will you be skeptical until it is proven, that's if you had the power to Order his lynching.. would you??

Why is it that if America and the West says so, Then its True even without any Evidence presented..Why?

It seems some people in this forum knows Russia and Putin more than Putin himself. You guys talk about Russian military and what Putin will do as you are part and parcel of the Russian military.
Do you guys think Putin is stupid to attack America? for the sake of who? Syria? you guys are joking. The only time Putin will attack America is only if a Russian territory is attacked by the US not because of one senseless Assad who has allowed his country to be turned to a weapon testing ground because of his love for power.
America will never deliberately attack Russian military in Syria, they are not stupid but they can attack Syria whether Russia likes it or not except Russia wants to escalate which is not in their interest.
The best for Russia at this point is to quickly end this war otherwise they would be humiliated. With the threat they made, one would have thought that US ships and military assets in the region would have been destroyed by Russia immediately after the attack but they would not do that because it would mean a declaration of war with the US. So why would they have to put themselves in an awkward position when they know their limits?

greatagain17:


The Kremlin do more of talking than action unlike my mentor, Donald J. trump . This is the 2nd time tomahawk missiles will be fired at Syria yet no significant military response from Syria greatest ally, Russia. Don't think Russia want any War atm... Cold War didn't end in Russia's favour.

Let's hope you're right on this, because if things escalate further I doubt Nigeria will escape the disastrous ripple effects

Lighthouseman:
Ok
Syria has shown resilience in the face of thus war fighting terrorists such as isis et al.
How are we sure the so called chemical attack eminated from the syrian govt and nit jihadist to curry support from the west?

The US will not do anything of such if they don't have concrete proof where the chemical attack emanated from

greiboy:
Stop typing stuff from your head

The high prices encouraged fracking in America which was thought of as a very expensive way of extracting crude oil before that time.


The revolution of fracking in America meant it imported less oil from other countries.

America was the leading importer of crude oil before that time.

Even Nigeria was not left out because it exported majority of its oil to America before that time. This meant Nigeria had nowhere to sell its oil at that time. This lead to the laws of demand and supply to naturally take place and the high prices began to tumble

Now Saudi Arabia and other oil producers that can improve their capacity started producing more crude oil to make up for the shortfall in earnings.

please do some research and don't just listen to CNN, I know what I am saying.

enonche85:


The US will not do anything of such if they don't have concrete proof where the chemical attack emanated from

like they had concrete prove for 9/11 ko?

AFONJAPIG:
if Americans, Russians and North Koreans are looking for where to test their arsenal let them come to North east and do whatever that pleases them with that area... in fact the Worldwar 3 must start from northern and south western Nigeria

What a dumb fool. how stupid can humans get? Those bombs will destroy the whole if Nigeria even if you drop them in Niger or cameroun but ipoop pigs like you are too ignorant to know that

out of 110 fired by US 13 was shot down by Syria military defence.

transformed:
Well they halted both first and second world wars...without lifting a finger the Berlin wall came down, USSR crumbled

Ok, let them go and attack North Korea and let us see how far?

I don't think that there is anyone denying that chemical weapon was dropped from an helicopter in the affected area. What Russian govt and Asaad do is deny responsibility.

But in this current case, besides other covert intelligence operations, the West, based on public records, made it clear that no other entity but (Russia cum Iran backed) Asaad regime uses helicopters in that area.

Plus, this particular operation was purely targeted at Syria's research facilities, not Iran's and certainly not Russia's. So this is merely another warning signal, and there had been zero report of civilian or military casualties to it.

So, please, tune down that your anti-US narrative. And be guided. If the US goes down, this world will collapse into total anarchy, and the concept of individual liberty will be a thing of the past.

MrMystrO:


You should be the one to question what you're told. I'm glad you used the term "allegedly" to describe the chemical weapons use. However i want to ask u a question. Will you agree a man on the street accused of stealing be lynched when No EVIDENCE whatsoever can be provided that he stole anything, or will you be skeptical until it is proven, that's if you had the power to Order his lynching.. would you??

Why is it that if America and the West says so, Then its True even without any Evidence presented..Why?

greiboy:
You appear to me as a nonentity, just picking on random comments to expose your ignorance..

Where did I suggest Russia fighting America will be cold war

Every tom, dick and harry trying to make sense of international politics

Do you know when America invaded Afghanistan at all? Wasn't it after Osama bin laden and his group of Islamic touts caused a ripple in international security on September 11 2001?

Do you know why America invaded Iraq, have you tried to study the geopolitics of the region for one second atall

Do you know why the Russian will die for Assad rather than have any American interest very close to its defense base?

Do you know why Iran is working over board to ensure Assad remain the president of Syria?


Do you understand America interest in Israel?


I will school you on international politics if necessary bro. I am not joking about that.

You are completely ignorant I swear.
The same Osama bin laden that was used by America in the 80s to haunt the Socialist government of Afghanistan?
Some of you just jump into history at midlevel.
Osama became an enemy when he targeted America.
when he was wrecking havoc in Afghanistan on behalf of America, he was a freedom fighter.

The same with the Benghazi purported moderates that eventually killed the American ambassador.

enonche85:


The US will not do anything of such if they don't have concrete proof where the chemical attack emanated from

Yeah, just like the fake evidence of weapons of mass destruction that made them invaded Iraq in 2003 abi?

Some of you are learners.

KratosCorp:
I don't think that there is anyone denying that chemical weapon was dropped from an helicopter in the affected area. What Russian govt and Asaad do is deny responsibility.

But in this current case, besides other covert intelligence operations, the West, based on public records, made it clear that no other entity but (Russia cum Iran backed) Asaad regime uses helicopters in that area.

Plus, this particular operation was purely targeted at Syria's research facilities, not Iran's and certainly not Russia's. So this is merely another warning signal, and there had been zero report of civilian or military casualties to it.

So, please, tune down that your anti-US narrative. And be guided. If the US goes down, this world will collapse into total anarchy, and the concept of individual liberty will be a thing of the past.

Who said it was an helicopter?
And don't say what you don't know.
American helicopters are in the skies if east ghouta though limited.
Moreover why did Maris said they don't have evidence now?
Tell me why?