bobofati: Nd who told you he likes you?

LMAO...

Julieccentric: Goood riddance to bad rubbish..never liked him anyway

beef....who do you like then? Fat lips

No, he should file in an appeal against that decision 60tons is too much na, and that 3 matches ban on top of it is also too much.

Leemak: ........those of u supporting white people against black people like u are suffering from 'inferioritycomplex'.......

beg ur pardon sir it is nt abt inferioritycomplex it is jst abt fact hw do expect an igala man 2 interprete igbo language 2 a typical igbo man?

dr.laykay:
Being a chelsea fan wouldnt stop me from saying the truth.thats a perfect judgement!

what makes it perfect sir?....no be england fa?

Mikel for use pigeon take curse am... the guy fck up well well oh e no even get evidence self

I actually saw this coming. Was mikel actually expecting anything different?! Mata was wise enough to redraw his law suit against the referee. While Obinna Michael Mumu was st[u]pid enough to continue pressing charges for something he didn't hear. He said RAMIRES told him the referee called him a monkey, but we all know that Ramires is brazilian. He's not good in english, probably the referee said "Shut up mikel" and he thought the referee said "Shut up monkey". Also, mikel wasen't the only one that filed a law suit againt the referee, the entire Chelsea FC team encouraged him to; when the case was in court, did they come out to give evidence knowing well that mikel didn't hear anything?! NO! It would have been better if Chelsea FC was fined instead. That's a white man's game for you. Now that he's banned i belive they're going to sit down and watch. Sorry mikel, but next time you have to play wisely.

.

MORALS: Never f[u]ck with a white man in his own country.

Mikel no hear the opinion wen d ref speak....

I actually saw this coming. Was mikel actually expecting anything different?! Mata was wise enough to redraw his law suit against the referee. While Obinna Michael Mumu was st[u]pid enough to continue pressing charges for something he didn't hear. He said RAMIRES told him the referee called him a monkey, but we all know that Ramires is brazilian. He's not good in english, probably the referee said "Shut up mikel" and he thought the referee said "Shut up monkey". Also, mikel wasen't the only one that filed a law suit againt the referee, the entire Chelsea FC team encouraged him to; when the case was in court, did they come out to give evidence knowing well that mikel didn't hear anything?! NO! It would have been better if Chelsea FC was fined instead. That's a white man's game for you. Now that he's banned i belive they're going to sit down and watch. Sorry mikel, but next time you have to play wisely.

.

MORALS: Never f[u]ck with a white man in his own country..

Clerverly: Thank gods ooo. Up Man U!!! Up Red Devils!!!
Up! Up!! Man U!!! Down! Down!! Cheski!!!. Who is laughing last now

And u cal ursef a nigerian,SORRY FOR U!!!

They told Mikel that he was called a Monkey! so what should he do?

England star trashed a ref's room when he was sent off, he only got a fine!!!!

It was Ramires who heard the word MONKEY!!! NOT MIKEL

It was Chelsea FC that reported Clattenburg to the FA!!! NOT MIKEL

The FA just use Mikel as a scape-goat because Chelsea FC refuse to apologise to the Ref.

Am an arsenal fan, but the truth is dat, dis is utter rubbish! Mikel made a complaint, ramires said he heard the ref racially abuse mikel. Are de sayin the ref said notin of the sort or are de sayin wat d ref said did not amount to racial abuse? D FA has long bin cowardly backin manu up. Now de com up wit sum stewpid ban, and an equally idiotic fine! For dos of u nit-witted manu, nincumpooped fans, jus remember dis: 1day, dat chewin gum tottin fergusen wil leav d stage and u wil be like, chaff blown away. Rubbish!.. I blame wenger, for always shuttin his trap wen issues like dis spring up.hopfully he goes along wit his fellow Warlock, fergie. Nansense!....and by d way, shldnt drogba be given d ballon d‘or?

donclemo: Mikel for use pigeon take curse am... the guy fck up well well oh e no even get evidence self

u tink sey hm sabi pidgin

Clerverly: Thank gods ooo. Up Man U!!! Up Red Devils!!!
Up! Up!! Man U!!! Down! Down!! Cheski!!!. Who is laughing last now

....waitn. Do ur brain? Pple ar tokn sense here u are tokn rubbish....idiot man. U ko woman. U ni...ode

donclemo: Mikel for use pigeon take curse am... the guy fck up well well oh e no even get evidence self

If dem insult you with language wey you no dey understand, you go feel am?

Haaaaaaabaaaaaa,this bloody racist;Terry received is it not just 3 match ban for racism and a black is receiving 3 match ban and £60,000 just for reporting a suspected racism case.

Clemzy16: While Obinna Michael Mumu was st[u]pid enough to continue pressing charges for something he didn't hear.


]mikel wasen't the only one that filed a law suit againt the referee, the entire Chelsea FC team encouraged him to;[/b] when the case was in court, did they come out to give evidence knowing well that mikel didn't hear anything?! NO! It would have been better if Chelsea FC was fined instead. That's a white man's game for you. Now that he's banned i belive they're going to sit down and watch. Sorry mikel, but next time you have to play wisely.

.

MORALS: Never f[u]ck with a white man in his own country..

The phrase "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing"

Meaning. A small amount of knowledge can mislead people into thinking that they are more expert than they really are.

It appears a lot of people are getting this wrong. He wasn't punished for accusing the referee of racism but for his assault on the referee after the match. SIMPLE!

Haaaaaaabaaaaaa,these bloody racist;Terry received is it not just 3 match ban for racism and a black is receiving 3 match ban and £60,000 just for reporting a suspected racism case. So if someone told me my life is been threatened by someone and i report the case to the police,i'm a criminal.Na wa oh

ALEBS: It appears a lot of people are getting this wrong. He wasn't punished for accusing the referee of racism but for his assault on the referee after the match. SIMPLE!

Nuff said!!!

demelza: Oh please! This isnt about racism but about justice. Mikel almost ruined a man's life and reputation with dem say, dem say. He just got served

you sound as useless as the england fa. in the same game with the same ref, chelsea were robbed with two red cards and an offside goal. what did the fa say? the same ref disallowed a goal scored by tottenham against man u in 2006 and allowed a controversial nani goal against tottenham in 2010. what did the fa do? if you lack information and knowledge, the name of the ref is mark clattenburg of which we are in an internet age, you can google the name and read what ppl who are not sentimental about this game are writing and saying about this same man whose mistakes are always in favour of one team - man u.

Naija_pikin 1: Am an arsenal fan, but the truth is dat, dis is utter rubbish! Mikel made a complaint, ramires said he heard the ref racially abuse mikel. Are de sayin the ref said notin of the sort or are de sayin wat d ref said did not amount to racial abuse? D FA has long bin cowardly backin manu up. Now de com up wit sum stewpid ban, and an equally idiotic fine! For dos of u nit-witted manu, nincumpooped fans, jus remember dis: 1day, dat chewin gum tottin fergusen wil leav d stage and u wil be like, chaff blown away. Rubbish!.. I blame wenger, for always shuttin his trap wen issues like dis spring up.hopfully he goes along wit his fellow Warlock, fergie. Nansense!....and by d way, shldnt drogba be given d ballon d‘or?

thunder fire ur idiotic mouth there, MUMU CHELSHIT FANS

1025:

you sound as useless as the england fa. in the same game with the same ref, chelsea were robbed with two red cards and an offside goal. what did the fa say? the same ref disallowed a goal scored by tottenham against man u in 2006 and allowed a controversial nani goal against tottenham in 2010. what did the fa do? if you lack information and knowledge, the name of the ref is mark clattenburg of which we are in an internet age, you can google the name and read what ppl who are not sentimental about this game are writing and saying about this same man whose mistakes are always in favour of one team - man u.

thunder fire ur idiotic mouth there, MUMU CHELSHIT FANS

dr.laykay:
Being a chelsea fan wouldnt stop me from saying the truth.thats a perfect judgement!

L.O.L

Leemak: ........those of u supporting white people against black people like u are suffering from 'inferioritycomplex'.......

...I suppose u r suffering frm illetracy,get d facts of the matter and stop bin stupidly sentimental abt colour of skin

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8V845zmQbQ


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecGk9YW2kXU


Mark Clattenburg said Rooney did nothing wrong the FA even asked him to look at the video again, he said Rooney nothing wrong, now when they said Man City's Balotelli stepped on Parkers head, they ordered Howard Webb indirectly asking him to change his mind, which he did!!

that serves mikel right. Here in naija, we are used to "hear say". In law, he who alleges must have a proof. The ban shld have been extented to 8 games. I think the FA is very lenient wit mikel

cyril83: beef....who do you like then? Fat lips

. As a United Fan i feel d ref spoilt d match and if anyone should be fined, he should be d one..his performance on d day was nothing to write home abt..

size38: that serves mikel right. Here in naija, we are used to "hear say". In law, he who alleges must have a proof. The ban shld have been extented to 8 games. I think the FA is very lenient wit mikel

. Lemme help u Mugu think of a gud punishment since ur brain is under ur legs..the FA 4 kokoma deport am...

1025:

you sound as useless as the england fa. in the same game with the same ref, chelsea were robbed with two red cards and an offside goal. what did the fa say? the same ref disallowed a goal scored by tottenham against man u in 2006 and allowed a controversial nani goal against tottenham in 2010. what did the fa do? if you lack information and knowledge, the name of the ref is mark clattenburg of which we are in an internet age, you can google the name and read what ppl who are not sentimental about this game are writing and saying about this same man whose mistakes are always in favour of one team - man u.

...here we go again..enof of dis conspiracy theory plz...so convinient 4u 2 forget dat he was d same ref dat officiated d 6 - 1 demolition of United by their city rivals ryt in front of their own fans..Evans was sent off in dat particular game..talk of selective memory..

Julieccentric: Goood riddance to bad rubbish..never liked him anyway

If u like, like him and if u like hate him...the fact is 'he doesn't give a damn who like or hate him'...by the way he's already rich...
No insult here...I'm nt a fan of english football...Just dat I hate ppl saying dey hate someone that don't even knw u,some will even go to d extent of raining abuse on an already rich man.
SMH

All ds guys wey no d undastnd english... The report said he was charged for threathening a refree which is an offence in football not because he lied. This is to say that if even if the refree was found guilty, mikel would still serve a ban for his reactions. Bad belle mk una allow Ma Mikel rest ooooo.