Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,154,766 members, 7,824,214 topics. Date: Saturday, 11 May 2024 at 05:02 AM

2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? - Education (14) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Education / 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? (42446 Views)

My Friend's Waec Result !!! What Course Can He Study ??? / Sad! Nigerian Student Commit Suicide Over Poor Result / Unilorin Post-UME Result: What Did You Score? (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) ... (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by mathefaro(m): 6:06pm On May 07, 2013
mathefaro: [/quote]
[quote author=ola_pluto]
No. You're not a thoughtful person. Its not my fault that you cannot reason along. You probably havent done as much exams as I've done. Exams like JAMB cannot be generic. They need to be able to catch out even the most brilliant students. The questions may be presented as easy, but trust me, there's a catch in every question. Only the gifted will spot it. Those gifted ones get high marks. The ones who are not reasonable will not spot it and come out of exam hall making noise how easy the exam is. Even from this thread, many of you guys have shown very little understanding of simple lines of thoughts, talk-less of a JAMB paper set by experienced uni lecturers who specialise in picking out what students dont know.
Mr. Ola_mercury or whatever you call yourself, it's quite obvious that you think you know about everything whereas you know nothing. It's just too pathetic that you can't read and comprehend simple English. I never disputed the fact that students are generally no more diligent in their studies but you can't tell that I can't vouch for a student I tutored for 4years. it shows how irresponsible and useless you are either as a teacher or a father if you can't vouch for your students or children to a particular extent. Do you want to tell me you don't have unserious students in your school when you CLAIMED to be serious and studious? I looked at the questions again and couldn't find any form of trickish questions and I can say it authoritatively again that my boy is more than capable of getting more than 90 marks in that maths talkless of the mysterious 47 he was given. We all know that 1+ 1=2 so if your child or student came back from an exam and told you he chose 2 but the results came out depicting another thing, will you still say you can't vouch for him just because the question must be tricking. I wish you experience what these students are going through and I'll like to see your reactions. the professor who knows all and has done all the exams in d world.
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by felastika(m): 6:20pm On May 07, 2013
Umartins1: but, what IF JAMB realise the error and re-mark the slips and we are given our rightful scores, what should we do to those alleging us of inadequate preparations?

plus,

was there any year with this kind of protest?

For ur mind!!!
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by mbourie(m): 6:49pm On May 07, 2013
ola_pluto: For those saying they 'read like hell'. I challenge you to come out and say how many hours a day you read, how many past papers you thrashed. How many times you read Ababio and Okeke front to back. I think the equation is very simple. If you do not read, you cannot pass JAMB.
Correct!!!! What hurts me d most is dat the poor kids don't read again...they want to meet up d rich kids-davido ; forgetting that immitation they say is suicide. The rich kids are presently ahead of them both in social/information and academic cycle. In my milieu, U c boys and girls between d ages of 15-19 searching 4 blue-collar jobs in order to buy blackberry fone...After d exam I tested most of dem; they know nothing. I am sure most ppl that applied 4d CBT exam are d rich....they know how to use d computer not only to chat but also to write exams,design,program etc., and I would not be surprised if they do exceedingly well above d poor-MBT exam, who only know how 2 use d computer to 2go,Facebook and d likes.
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by MichaelSokoto(m): 7:39pm On May 07, 2013
Nna ehn, na only 2 nairalanders reach 195, fear no even let dem reach 196 talkless of 199, one guy even score 25 out of 400. I guess 2 much Tonto Dikeh thread & 1st 2 comment tinz iz responsible ni. grin
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by Ortarico(m): 8:34pm On May 07, 2013
simdam500: bolded part gbam!!! if 100marks were deducted, defintely those that had 300+ had over 400 right

Guy, it's totally not as you think.
Those that scored 300 and above were given their right score as per centre performance and conduct. A centre where there was a lower case of malpractise tends scripts to be marked and awarded accordinly while a centre where there was high or higher malpractise tends scripts to be marked with a negative or deducting guide thereby making results awarded the other way.
So, the guyz who scored these were lucky and had a good centre. Most centres were guilty of this and affected the evaluation of the innocents.
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by Ortarico(m): 8:38pm On May 07, 2013
simdam500: bolded part gbam!!! if 100marks were deducted, defintely those that had 300+ had over 400 right
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by cleverdude: 9:16pm On May 07, 2013
mbourie:
Correct!!!! What hurts me d most is dat the poor kids don't read again...they want to meet up d rich kids-davido ; forgetting that immitation they say is suicide. The rich kids are presently ahead of them both in social/information and academic cycle. In my milieu, U c boys and girls between d ages of 15-19 searching 4 blue-collar jobs in order to buy blackberry fone...After d exam I tested most of dem; they know nothing. I am sure most ppl that applied 4d CBT exam are d rich....they know how to use d computer not only to chat but also to write exams,design,program etc., and I would not be surprised if they do exceedingly well above d poor-MBT exam, who only know how 2 use d computer to 2go,Facebook and d likes.



Permit me to say this: "your comment is evident balderdash"
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by snowboy12: 10:00pm On May 07, 2013
i scored 203...tnx To God
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by chiwuike20: 11:21pm On May 07, 2013
viccipedia: goood msg...u shld try telling the poor masses whr they would get d money to buy ALL THE TEXT BOOKS jamb prescribed....
I strongly don't think dat a dedicated young student who knws d value of reading will have much problem acquiring those. If they cut their spending on self gratification, or beta still get assistance from parents, relative, neighbors etc, they will get 2 or 3 of them in each subject.
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by chiwuike20: 11:39pm On May 07, 2013
SIMPLIFIED: For those of u that are saying 2go, bbm, candidates nt reading etc. U can say thrash cos u dnt know what students went through..i read like my life depended on it until even my dad started pleading with me to take it easy. Students are nt reading but the library in my town is always overflowing with students..how can i have 227 after all d reading nd i can prove it up to jamb headquarters i wrote my exam 100% on my own nd i know what i wrote..i crosschecked at home to be sure of what i did..scoring 59 in bio dat was simpler than interscience is far cry from my true score..something went wrong either with the marking, uploading or a deliberate attempt by jamb to eliminate many out cos of the high no.
U can never spot ur lapses or mistakes u made when screening ur question papers with a biased mind( I mean wen u feel u were cheated). Take ur time, scrutinizing with a hard eye, then u'll see some of ur mistakes. I've checked of to 10 times each and most a time I discover an elusive error
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by chiwuike20: 11:39pm On May 07, 2013
SIMPLIFIED: For those of u that are saying 2go, bbm, candidates nt reading etc. U can say thrash cos u dnt know what students went through..i read like my life depended on it until even my dad started pleading with me to take it easy. Students are nt reading but the library in my town is always overflowing with students..how can i have 227 after all d reading nd i can prove it up to jamb headquarters i wrote my exam 100% on my own nd i know what i wrote..i crosschecked at home to be sure of what i did..scoring 59 in bio dat was simpler than interscience is far cry from my true score..something went wrong either with the marking, uploading or a deliberate attempt by jamb to eliminate many out cos of the high no.
U can never spot ur lapses or mistakes u made when screening ur question papers with a biased mind( I mean wen u feel u were cheated). Take ur time, scrutinizing with a hard eye, then u'll see some of ur mistakes. I've checked of to 10 times each and most a time I discover an elusive error
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by Nobody: 12:32am On May 08, 2013
when I took this exam back then I tackled ALL THE Questions from 1978-2009 for Math, Physics, Chemistry and English more than once! I knew my onion as far as these subjects were concerned but also understood that the secret to doing well on Jamb was to put myself under the exam situation as many times as possible long before the exam itself. Besides studying the textbooks I had with me, I spent blocks of 3:30 minutes almost everyday and months before the exam tackling the past years' questions. IT PAID OFF BIG TIME cool . I was very disappointed with my score back then (297) because I expected a 350 at the very least smiley- after having made estimates from my performances on the practice exams. some people here didn't even try practicing well enough but expected to score 300. Others studied textbooks only but expected to have perfect scores. I know people have different approaches to exams but please stop all these useless arguments about the graders of this JAMB. Here was the break down of what I got:

Math - 75, expected that I would score > 90
Physics 81, expected that I would score> 90 too
Chemistry 68, expected that I would score> 85
English 73, expected that I would score > 85 too.

And yeah, the exam that year 'felt' far easier than some of the past questions that I had smashed before then.
What's my point? STOP WHINING. Jamb is a standard exam and for the questions? There's more than meets the eye.
I am pretty sure I put in far more effort than most of you here and expected something far higher than what I actually scored (which wasn't too bad either). I know it's frustrating but just go home and study more. Stop the blame game. shikena


FYI: There were mass exam malpractices at my exam center too.
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by phtemie(m): 1:39am On May 08, 2013
For those saying those that got low marks didn't read enough and that when u wrote yours u performed better...i can bet it that if it were to be this year's jamb..none of you would have gotten closer to what u are saying u all got...
The simple truth is that jamb made use of negative marking...not that they just deducted marks anyhow..those u missed were deducted from the ones you got...they just started this strange marking scheme last yr...i know of a guy that got 286 in 2011 and 230 this year..
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by phtemie(m): 1:55am On May 08, 2013
Those who got above 300 are exceptionally brilliant dudes and geniuses that would have gotten like 350+ if the marking sheme was not too strict...
One thing about negative marking is that it creates big differences in scores..
for instance sum1 got 45 over 50...he missed 5...so 45-5=40 marks..
And the other got 35..he missed 15..so 35-15=20 marks...
From this,the difference in their marks should have been 10(45 to 35)...But d negative marking increased it to 20(40 to 20)...
so that is just it..
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by viccipedia: 3:37am On May 08, 2013
chiwuike20: I strongly don't think dat a dedicated young student who knws d value of reading will have much problem acquiring those. If they cut their spending on self gratification, or beta still get assistance from parents, relative, neighbors etc, they will get 2 or 3 of them in each subject.
frm ur comment, you've never struggled to get anything or see what people go through just to eat... then u talk abt text books and help from nebors, how manytyms have u helpd a nebor? you would ofcourse say 1million tyms buh u realy dnt sound like u know wats going on in d country.

1 Like

Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by Nobody: 4:34am On May 08, 2013
phtemie: For those saying those that got low marks didn't read enough and that when u wrote yours u performed better...i can bet it that if it were to be this year's jamb..none of you would have gotten closer to what u are saying u all got...
The simple truth is that jamb made use of negative marking...not that they just deducted marks anyhow..those u missed were deducted from the ones you got...they just started this strange marking scheme last yr...i know of a guy that got 286 in 2011 and 230 this year..

phtemie: For those saying those that got low marks didn't read enough and that when u wrote yours u performed better...i can bet it that if it were to be this year's jamb..none of you would have gotten closer to what u are saying u all got...
The simple truth is that jamb made use of negative marking...not that they just deducted marks anyhow..those u missed were deducted from the ones you got...they just started this strange marking scheme last yr...i know of a guy that got 286 in 2011 and 230 this year..

That is very untrue. You have no proof to back up your claims at all.Give me a reputable source that said 'jamb made use of negative marking' in 2013. It's always been a rumour even before the time I took it. Standard exams will state whether marks will be deducted for wrong answers or not if that's ever the case. I scored above 340 in most of the past questions I worked on (using harsh grading like minus .25 for every wrong answer), but didn't get above 300 on the main Jamb itself. Once again, there's nothing special about this year's Jamb.
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by phtemie(m): 7:09am On May 08, 2013
I know no matter what i say,some people won't believe...most of u that u're claiming u get 290+ can not even get closer to 250 if it were to be this yr's jamb..
In 2011,almost 3000 students got above 300...but last yr and this yr...they were 3 and 10 students respectively...no one need to tell you that the marking scheme has changed over time...
all my brothers/friends that wrote it in 2010&2011 got above 250 without anybody helping them..one of them got 204 this yr..come and re-write it..and smell urself..
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by biz2get(m): 9:06am On May 08, 2013
Ortarico:

Guy, it's totally not as you think.
Those that scored 300 and above were given their right score as per centre performance and conduct. A centre where there was a lower case of malpractise tends scripts to be marked and awarded accordinly while a centre where there was high or higher malpractise tends scripts to be marked with a negative or deducting guide thereby making results awarded the other way.
So, the guyz who scored these were lucky and had a good centre. Most centres were guilty of this and affected the evaluation of the innocents.

Agreed?!!!!
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by biz2get(m): 9:13am On May 08, 2013
phtemie: Those who got above 300 are exceptionally brilliant dudes and geniuses that would have gotten like 350+ if the marking sheme was not too strict...
One thing about negative marking is that it creates big differences in scores..
for instance sum1 got 45 over 50...he missed 5...so 45-5=40 marks..
And the other got 35..he missed 15..so 35-15=20 marks...
From this,the difference in their marks should have been 10(45 to 35)...But d negative marking increased it to 20(40 to 20)...
so that is just it..

I pity you, you say those who got 300+ are brilliant. Uh? A lady here got 309 and she claims that's not her score why? Bcus she can't defend it..

I still repeat it, 2013/2014 jamb was marked at random.
Ppl who I expect to be entering uni's now, are planing to goto poly.

Wait!!! Some one answers this.
Which year as jamb taken place and you see a candidate getting '5' as aggregate umm
Pls tell...

Lemme say this if jamb was scrabed, those who claim to be prepared will enta school #period
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by cleverdude: 9:14am On May 08, 2013
phtemie: I know no matter what i say,some people won't believe...most of u that u're claiming u get 290+ can not even get closer to 250 if it were to be this yr's jamb..
In 2011,almost 3000 students got above 300...but last yr and this yr...they were 3 and 10 students respectively...no one need to tell you that the marking scheme has changed over time...
all my brothers/friends that wrote it in 2010&2011 got above 250 without anybody helping them..one of them got 204 this yr..come and re-write it..and smell urself..

You are speculating,man. How could you assert out of assumptions? Quite shallow....
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by cleverdude: 9:21am On May 08, 2013
biz2get:

I pity you, you say those who got 300+ are brilliant. Uh? A lady here got 309 and she claims that's not her score why? Bcus she can't defend it..

I still repeat it, 2013/2014 jamb was marked at random.
Ppl who I expect to be entering uni's now, are planing to goto poly.

Wait!!! Some one answers this.
Which year as jamb taken place and you see a candidate getting '5' as aggregate umm
Pls tell...

Lemme say this if jamb was scrabed, those who claim to be prepared will enta school #period


Pretty sensible;I've got so many candidates and respective scores to analyse in this year's UTME,and I discover that there's this dubious thing attached to this year's exam. Cant finalize though,but its logially palpable that scores were most likely awarded randomly. It could be some technical glitches over there at JAMB.

1 Like

Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by Nobody: 10:24am On May 08, 2013
Fynestboi: Students in Kano protest mass UTME failure


Kano – Hundreds of students, who sat for the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination on Mondayin Kano staged a peaceful demonstration against mass failure and withholding of their results.
The students stormed thepremises of the Federal Radio Corporation of Nigeria in Kano on motorcycles around noon and carried placards and green leaves to show their anger.
Spokesman for the candidates, Haruna Maidabam, described thewithholding of their results as a deliberate attempt to deny them theopportunity to further their studies.
According to him, more than 10, 000 students whosat for the examination in Kano metropolis have yet to access their results.
Maidabam said when the results were released last week, they went to the zonal office of Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board in Kano (JAMB) to complain but were directed to go and repeat the thumb printing for verification.
‘’There is no reason for any verification of thumb- print,’’ he said.
He called on the authorities concerned to do something urgently to address their predicament.
When contacted, the JAMB Zonal Coordinator, Hajiya Karimatu Abubakar, described the incident as unfortunate and attributed it to “some technical hitches”.
Abubakar said as soon asthe hitches were rectified, the issue would be resolved. (NAN)

vanguard news
Can u imagine?Technical Hitches,Hitches that will cost some People their Futures,and they are just "Hitches", make I catch Dibu,I'll give him some Technical Hitches to think about cheesy
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by Nobody: 10:36am On May 08, 2013
chiwuike20: I'll advise u to leave dis shifting-of-blame attitude and u'll excel. Reading alone is not enough criteria to passing exams. Reading d ryt books according to syllabus, and 4 those who use past question, making research to ensure u dnt go along wit d tide of wrong answers r d concepts of passing exams. When I wrote post ume @ Oau, I discovered I scored 48 in govt, wch turns out to b my most-read subject. I was frustrated and demoralized. Even after screening d questions I still felt cheated. Two yrs later when I read "substance of politics", I saw dat I actually failed most of d questions unknown to me, and I eventually realized I have been duped by relying on past question. Take time to look 4 jamb recommended textbook as u prepare 4 ur Putme
I am tired of saying this over and over again;I am NOT shifting Blame in any Way,I KNOW my capabilities;I KNOW how I prepared;I KNOW what I wrote;I KNOW what I should have Scored;I KNOW that there is NO way I would score 51% in ANY Exam set at O level Standard. last Year;I wrote OAU's Post UTME,I scored 272,and you and I know OAU's Post UTME is higher Standard than the UTME.so..
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by Nobody: 10:43am On May 08, 2013
ola_pluto:
I do not know your qualifications as a teacher, but I think it is rather unintelligent to vouch for a student you didnt sit the exam with. No teacher does that! No sensible teacher at least. I passed through a university where integrity is guarded. I had times I left exam hall waiting for a 90% only to see 55%. When I ask for the photocopy of my scripts and go through it, I see tiny, silly mistakes which have caused me to be marked down.
A teacher like you should be at the forefront of guiding students to start preparing for next year Jamb. You will be heavily humiliated if you keep vouching for students this way. You're probably one of those thinly breaded teachers responsible for this mass failure.
Up there,one of your Posts says you won't reply to name calling by Peepz Here,yet;look at you insulting someone who is a professional in a Field you have Probably never stepped into for Standing behind a Student he believes deserves it,in your myopic Brain,you think he would do that lightly?
I have one small piece of Advice for you;go take an IQ test,I'm sure you will be surprised wink
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by phtemie(m): 10:59am On May 08, 2013
Lol..Why are you guys so bitter and resentful in your replies?..lol..it is a bitter truth,those who got higher marks performed better...no need to involve the brilliant dudes that got 300+....and about the marking,there was nothing dubious about it...it was just strict...u can criticise me again...
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by Nobody: 11:12am On May 08, 2013
phtemie: Lol..Why are you guys so bitter and resentful in your replies?..lol..it is a bitter truth,those who got higher marks performed better...no need to involve the brilliant dudes that got 300+....and about the marking,there was nothing dubious about it...it was just strict...u can criticise me again...
I'm sure you havent heard about the Lady who got 309 but says that is not herScore because she cannot defend it? anyway;enough talk,na for Post UTME we go know
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by Ortarico(m): 11:27am On May 08, 2013
phtemie: Lol..Why are you guys so bitter and resentful in your replies?..lol..it is a bitter truth,those who got higher marks performed better...no need to involve the brilliant dudes that got 300+....and about the marking,there was nothing dubious about it...it was just strict...u can criticise me again...

fabeg go siddon 4 bush jor
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by biz2get(m): 12:42pm On May 08, 2013
cleverdude:


Pretty sensible;I've got so many candidates and respective scores to analyse in this year's UTME,and I discover that there's this dubious thing attached to this year's exam. Cant finalize though,but its ltally palpable that scores were most likely awarded randomly. It could be some technical glitches over there at JAMB.

No glitches, it was planed FG + Dibu + jamb board = random.

Check the stats well nor more that 500k candidates got a good score ie 240+
This thing is simple, just program the computer to not award more than 500k a good mark and the rest get rubbish
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by Ositainklord(m): 12:53pm On May 08, 2013
chiwuike20: This is a poorly framed-up lies being told here. 260 and 70 in jamb and uniben without getting admitted, is pure garbage. I cousin scored below dis cut-off marks and is presently studying law @ uniben. People lay much emphasis on their last year's score, who knws, most of them cheated and got away wit it, but were apprehended dis year. My sis was lucky to get away wit hers last year by being admitted wit anoda runsing @ unizik
Pls keep ur mouth oh! that guy knws wat hes sayin! Its no news that passing post utme doesnt always qualify u for admission. I was a testament to that. I saw someone with considerbly lower marks than mine that got admitted for my course last year so zip it!.
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by cleverdude: 1:22pm On May 08, 2013
koonbey:
Can u imagine?Technical Hitches,Hitches that will cost some People their Futures,and they are just "Hitches", make I catch Dibu,I'll give him some Technical Hitches to think about cheesy

I said it,"technical glitches". This country is just so unpredictable. :|
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by saleemema(m): 1:32pm On May 08, 2013
krimboy897: Same thing bothering me.. The highest score i have heard of is 181. Pls, if u scored above 200, signify. Tank U
mine is 221
Re: 2013 JAMB Poor Result: What Caused It? by cleverdude: 4:03pm On May 08, 2013
[b]
Information reaching us has confirmed that Jamb is set to release results of candidates with biometric verification problems by next week. Are you one of those having problem checking their Jamb result due to Biometric verification problem?

It will interest you to know that Jamb has finally decided to release the results of these candidates affected with this problem, according to Jamb, the problem is not from the candidates but from them (Jamb).

Jamb decided to look into the matter because a lot of candidates were affected by this development. Jamb has reassured the candidates that their result will be released next week.
It might interest you to know that you have just five times to check your Jamb result for free, when you exhaust this, for you to check your result the 6th time you have to purchase Jamb result checker scratch card, so it is advisable you print your result immediately you check it to avoid this kind of situation. This is application even if you are using your mobile phone to check your result.

Don’t just read this and go away, make sure you spread this information by clicking the share buttons below, so that anyone affected with this development will be informed.[/b]









....this is a substantial info,guys!

(1) (2) (3) ... (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (Reply)

Lockdown: We Are Hungry - Private Schools Teachers Cry Out / Different Types Of Students You Will Meet In An Exam Hall - Meme Collection / Redeployment Letter From Corper With "Spiritual Attack" - 'Aljanu'(photo)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 83
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.