frank3.16:
And that's the way it is...

One religion vs another

The christians vs each other. If everybody is right, who is wrong? And if everybody is wrong who is right.

Who is deciving who?

In all, all I can say is that u guys are just mocking God and even the Holy spirit who u all claim interpretes the bible for u. He seems to have caused a whole lot of confusion.

Imagine.... Frosbel, image, annony etc all have different doctrine from the same bible

Image123:

frosb is sadly an example of who Chesterton described below.
“But the new rebel is a skeptic,
and will not entirely trust
anything. He has no loyalty;
therefore he can never be really a
revolutionist. And the fact that he doubts
everything really gets in his way when he
wants to denounce anything. For all
denunciation implies a moral doctrine of
some kind; and the modern revolutionist
doubts not only the institution he
denounces, but the doctrine by which he
denounces it. . . . As a politician, he will
cry out that war is a waste of life, and then,
as a philosopher, that all life is waste of
time. A Russian pessimist will denounce a
policeman for killing a peasant, and then
prove by the highest philosophical
principles that the peasant ought to have
killed himself. . . . The man of this school
goes first to a political meeting, where he
complains that savages are treated as if they
were beasts; then he takes his hat and
umbrella and goes on to a scientific
meeting, where he proves that they
practically are beasts. In short, the modern
revolutionist, being an infinite skeptic, is
always engaged in undermining his own
mines. In his book on politics he attacks
men for trampling on morality; in his book
on ethics he attacks morality for trampling
on men. Therefore the modern man in
revolt has become practically useless for all
purposes of revolt. By rebelling against
everything he has lost his right to rebel
against anything.”
― G.K. Chesterton,

http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/382030-but-the-new-rebel-is-a-skeptic-and-will-not

OLAADEGBU:

This explains what frosbel is, a rebel and an anarchist without a just cause.

OLAADEGBU:

This explains what frosbel is, a rebel and an anarchist without a just cause.

frosbel:

a rebel against cults and hijackers of the true faith.

"For we are unto God a sweet savour of Christ, in them that are saved, and in them that perish: To the one we are the savour of death unto death; and to the other the savour of life unto life. And who is sufficient for these things?"

"loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil"

OLAADEGBU:

(2 Corinthians 2:15-16).

As you can see from Paul's letter above that a Christian's testimony draws and wins the one and on the other hand, repels and condemns the other. You and your cohorts together have:

(John 3:17).

It is only when we shine the glorious light of the gospel that your evil deeds on this forum become exposed.

frosbel:

On the contrary we have rejected the Cults and their Teachings and have decided to follow the word of GOD.

"And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness"

OLAADEGBU:

Rather, you've rejected the truth and decided to follow the words of your gods.

(2 Thessalonians 2:11-12).

frosbel:

I have no god but GOD, whereas you worship and mimic ordinary MEN as though they were gods.

OLAADEGBU:

Your god created no hell and you are right because he doesn't exist, he is just a figment of your own imagination. If you refuse to embrace the true gospel, the Almighty Yahweh in His righteousness will give you over to powerful delusions and a depraved mind of which you have been displaying without shame here on NL.

frosbel:

coming from a cultist, I don't think this should be taken seriously.

"And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness"

OLAADEGBU:

Forget about me and face what God will use to judge you on the last day:

(2 Thessalonians 2:11-12).

You should know that those who refuse to come to the glorious light of the gospel will be given over to darkness.

ijawkid:

And who said you are a stable??.....

You need persons like frosbel to help you to be stable.....

If you can believe that Jesus is the 2nd person in a Godhead(nothing of this sort nor does the expression exist in the scriptures but it is of mens tradition) then you need somebody to re-allign your thoughts to the truth.......

You see why frosbel said Jesus is not tradition??.........

frosbel:

The Holy Spirit is the authority on God's word, not Charles G Finney or John Wesley.

If the Berean Christians challenged Paul's teachings and if Paul admonished us to test all things, I am sure we are to rely on GOD and not MEN.

Image123: frosb is sadly an example of who Chesterton described below.
“But the new rebel is a skeptic,
and will not entirely trust
anything. He has no loyalty;
therefore he can never be really a
revolutionist. And the fact that he doubts
everything really gets in his way when he
wants to denounce anything. For all
denunciation implies a moral doctrine of
some kind; and the modern revolutionist
doubts not only the institution he
denounces, but the doctrine by which he
denounces it. . . . As a politician, he will
cry out that war is a waste of life, and then,
as a philosopher, that all life is waste of
time. A Russian pessimist will denounce a
policeman for killing a peasant, and then
prove by the highest philosophical
principles that the peasant ought to have
killed himself. . . . The man of this school
goes first to a political meeting, where he
complains that savages are treated as if they
were beasts; then he takes his hat and
umbrella and goes on to a scientific
meeting, where he proves that they
practically are beasts. In short, the modern
revolutionist, being an infinite skeptic, is
always engaged in undermining his own
mines. In his book on politics he attacks
men for trampling on morality; in his book
on ethics he attacks morality for trampling
on men. Therefore the modern man in
revolt has become practically useless for all
purposes of revolt. By rebelling against
everything he has lost his right to rebel
against anything.”
― G.K. Chesterton,

http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/382030-but-the-new-rebel-is-a-skeptic-and-will-not

hisblud:

This what i perceive in all athiest, nice post

Segeggs: @op .


i think you people are persecuting frosbel due to spiritual blindless stopping you from seeing the truth, the type that made saul persecute the early christians thinking he was doing the right thing

Pastor Kun:
@Frosbel
Keep up the good work and may God continue to give you wisdom.

DrummaBoy: ^I second you Kun on that submission

Frosbel allows freedom of thoughts.

Amen.

Pygru: Beware of Frosbel, Ijawkid, Truthislight & Seriallink
I like their anti Rcc stance, but most of their teachings are laced with false doctrines

Beware Of Goshen360 and Okeyxyz ;they said premarital se.x btw two consenting adults (Fornication in my Bible) is not a sin.

Also Beware of the catholic crew led by Italo and assisted by chukwudi44, ubenedictus, striktlymi etc

lagerwhenindoubt:

Is this your personal perception from experience or it was divinely revealed to you

Image123:
“But the new rebel is a skeptic,
and will not entirely trust
anything. He has no loyalty;
therefore he can never be really a
revolutionist. And the fact that he doubts
everything really gets in his waywhen he
wants to denounce anything. For all
denunciation implies a moral doctrine of
some kind; and the modern revolutionist
doubts not only the institution he
denounces, but the doctrine by which he
denounces it. . . . As a politician, he will
cry out that war is a waste of life, and then,
as a philosopher, that all life is waste of
time. A Russian pessimist will denounce a
policeman for killing a peasant, and then
prove by the highest philosophical
principles that the peasant ought to have
killed himself. . . . The man of this school
goes first to a political meeting, where he
complains that savages are treated as if they
were beasts; then he takes his hat and
umbrella and goes on to a scientific
meeting, where he proves that they
practically are beasts. In short, the modern
revolutionist, being an infinite skeptic, is
always engaged in undermining his own
mines. In his book on politics he attacks
men for trampling on morality; in his book
on ethics he attacks morality for trampling
on men. Therefore the modern man in
revolt has become practically useless for all
purposes of revolt. By rebelling against
everything he has lost his right to rebel
against anything.”
― G.K. Chesterton,
http://www.goodreads.com /quotes/382030-but-the- new-rebel-is-a-skeptic- and-will-not

pointblank 321: I have had a lot of discussions with muslims and atheists on this site. I discovered they all like frosbel's kind of Chritianity.

When unbelievers begin to like your type of Christianity, it shows you are not different from them. Something must be wrong with you.

Pastor Kun: Evidently Frosbel as ruffled a lot of feathers and exposed a lot of heresy being practised/taught in the name of christianity. It's no surprise he is being persecuted, it comes with the territory.

@Frosbel
Keep up the good work and may God continue to give you wisdom.

frosbel:

the funny thing is sinners loved Jesus while the religious pharisees and their hypocritical followers hated him. The hypocrites followed Jesus all over condemning him for eating and drinking with sinners, finding fault with almost everything he did etc. No different to the religious today.

We are not here to please the religious, we are here to call sinners to repentance and to come into the kingdom , free from the burden of religion and the hypocrisy of tradition.

frosbel: The Bible not MEN.

The Minority not the Majority.

Jesus not Tradition.


Amen.