MuttleyLaff:
You this man sef. I am loving your questions.
When are you going to paste that your Jide Kosoko meme.
The last you pasted on that talk about dry fasting thread, got be doubling up and laughing like a hyena two o'clock in the morning

Well, the son is betraying his dead father and tarnishing the good memory of him, these are detriments

Now its you, who is now being disgusting, that is "ayama" some will even call it "idọti", haba, son poking his mom?

Ranchhoddas:
I see. I will remember to use them copiously

Ranchhoddas:
You are sounding desperate. What if he was a bad father, philandering, uncaring, a drunkard and a wife-beater?

Ranchhoddas:
As e take dey be you na so that man vs man own dey be me.
Tufiakwa!

joseph1013:
In Matthew 19:3, Jesus is asked if a man can divorce his wife. In that context,

“ He answered, ‘Have you not read that the one who made them at the beginning “made them male and female” [Genesis 1:27], and said, “For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh” [Genesis 2:24]? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.’ ”
(Matthew 19:4-6, NRSV translation; Mark 10:6-9 is a parallel text)

joseph1013:
If I have to strain my eyes to see God depicted as a feminine and find it ubiquitous the rendering off God as a masculine character, does that not show you the leaning?

MuttleyLaff:
You dont have to. Was only saying it got me cracked earlier this morning when reading your comment on the dry fasting thread

On the contrary, it actually is you getting and being desperate, then go marry your own, not be coveting what is someone's else. I have already told you that besides God stopping the practice, science has backed up the reason why it is advisable to indulge in incentous relationships, but you winged it with how about if they arent going to breed? You desperate there with that angle, but you are cornered. There is no way the son will have his father's blessing to marry his mother. "Agbedo" loosely translated means "it just wont happen, it isnt going to happen"

You see God always has a foresight and He knew same sex relationships will eventually happen, so He by design, gave both male and female their individual G-spots. Bro, there is nothing tufiakwa there jor. If there is, then spell out what the tufiakwa is really. What exactly is the tufiakwa. Say it now, arent you a man?!

Ranchhoddas:
I got you

Does covet now have another meaning?
The scientific reason is only valid if they intend to breed. Can gay couples breed?
Many gay couples also do not have their father's blessing so what's the difference.
You have given your criteria i.e. Consenting adults, loving, non-harmful to another person etc. The point is that an incestuous relationship can meet your criteria. Why are you frowning at it?

The tufiakwa is the same tufiakwa you see in incestuous relationships.

PastorAIO:
Incest can result in deformed babies na.
Nobody wants that.

PastorAIO:
Incest can result in deformed babies na.
Nobody wants that.

HellVictorinho:

Gays can die as a result of complications associated with gay sex.

Ranchhoddas:
I know this. My problem with that guy is that he wants to allow for gay relationships with doing same for incestuous ones and he uses the Bible as his anchor.

Ranchhoddas:
I know this. My problem with that guy is that he wants to allow for gay relationships with doing same for incestuous ones and he uses the Bible as his anchor.

Michellekabod1:

That's the most disgraceful teaching that a Christian could bleat out. Almost threw up reading you both chat. Why can't the Bible be accepted fully(all the leaves of the holy book)? Why must scriptures be intepreted to suit one's subjective opinions?

PastorAIO:
Incest can result in deformed babies na.
Nobody wants that.

Ranchhoddas:
I know this. My problem with that guy is that he wants to allow for gay relationships with doing same for incestuous ones and he uses the Bible as his anchor.

PastorAIO:
Heterosexuals can die as a result of complications associated with hetero sex.

Michellekabod1:
That's the most disgraceful teaching that a Christian could bleat out.

Michellekabod1:
Almost threw up reading you both chat.

Michellekabod1:
Why can't the Bible be accepted fully (all the leaves of the holy book)?

Michellekabod1:
Why must scriptures be intepreted to suit one's subjective opinions?

Ranchhoddas:
I've been wondering same.
Muttleylaff over to you.

MuttleyLaff:


Ehn ehn... you're getting me now
"Do to others as you'd have them do you" is all about doing not what is evil, doing not what is wicked. It is about doing good, it is about empathy and/or compassion. The giving or showing of, has no barrier, no predijuce, no discrimination, no hatery, no etcetera

9inches:
h t t ps://youtu.be/sWbj-2DRLps

9inches:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sWbj-2DRLps

MuttleyLaff:


Ehn ehn... you're getting me now
"Do to others as you'd have them do you" is all about doing not what is evil, doing not what is wicked. It is about doing good, it is about empathy and/or compassion. The giving or showing of, has no barrier, no predijuce, no discrimination, no hatery, no etcetera

joseph1013:


Meaning that God allowed In.ce.st? According to the biblical scriptures, In.ce.st is forbidden.

“Never have sexual intercourse with anyone related to you by blood. I am the Lord." Leviticus 18:6 (God's Word Translation)

najib632:
It was permitted during the beginning of the human race, so that there will be easy population of the humans on the earth, In Islam Eve(Hauwa) Was saud to give birth to twins in pairs (a male and female), the first twins will get married to their younger ones and not themselves i.e. the older male will marry the younger female and the younger male will marry the older female. The rift between the brothers started when Cain wanted to marry his own twin because of she was more beautiful than his supposed mate, but he was denied this request, then they were ordered to make a sacrifice to Allah and he Abel brought the best he had out of his live stock while Cain brought the fruits with lowest quality. Allah accepted Abels sacrifice and rejected Cains, instead of blaming himself for his insincerity, he became jealous and killed Cain, the story Goes on.

9inches:

Simple biblical chronological account, Jesus appeared to

To Mary Magdalene alone at the tomb (Mark 16:9)

To second group of women (including Joanna) on their way back to the apostles (Matt. 28:8-10)

To the Apostle Peter (Luke 24:34)

To two disciples (Cleophas and one other disciple) walking along the road to Emmaus (Luke 24)

To the ten apostles (Thomas absent) who had gathered in the Upper Room of the holy city of Jerusalem (John 20:19)

To the eleven apostles (Thomas present) who had gathered in the Upper Room of Jerusalem (John 20:29)

To the seven disciples (Peter, Thomas, Nathanael, James the Greater, John, and two others) who had returned to their fishing on the shore of the Sea of Tiberias (Sea of Galilee) (John 21)

To more than 500 on a mountain in Galilee (1 Cor 15:6)

To James the Less(1 Cor 15:7)

To 120 of the infant Church on the Mount of Olives before his Ascension.

Second part on underway.

joseph1013:
DID THE RESURRECTION OF CHRIST REALLY HAPPEN?

Someone like 9inches would have us believe that the resurrection of Christ really happen and then base the need for the forgiveness of our sins on this foundation.

But how do they know that the resurrection really happen?

First, it is often claimed that the disciples' willingness to die for their faith in Jesus' Resurrection proves that they actually saw the risen Jesus. They will tell us that people are never willing to die for what they know to be untrue. But the assertion that Jesus' disciples died for their faith has no historical foundation; it is mere hearsay.

In other words, we have no historical grounding for the martyrdom of even one of Jesus' disciples. All details regarding their manner of dying emerge years later in accounts that are far removed from the actual events. Even if it could be proven historically that some of the earliest disciples were martyred, we would still be unable to look into their minds and know they died specifically for their belief in Jesus' Resurrection.

Joseph Smith was murdered by a mob in 1844 in Nauvoo, Illinois. Latter Day Saints believe he was martyred for his unwavering conviction that God revealed himself through golden tablets that Smith had discovered in 1830. Many non-Mormons believe he was killed because he was a criminal. If the facts are so readily disputed for a relatively recent and well-documented event like Joseph Smith's death, how can we say with any confidence how or why Jesus' disciples perished, let alone what was in their minds when they died?

Second, it is claimed that Jesus' disciples could not have experienced a mass hallucination to convince them of Jesus' Resurrection. Apologist Gary Habermas makes the argument as follows:

Hallucinations are individual occurrences. By their very nature only one person can see a given hallucination at a time. They certainly are not something which can be seen by a group of people ... Since an hallucination exists only in this subjective, personal sense, it is obvious that others cannot witness it (Habermas 2001).

This may be obvious to Habermas, but in fact such occurrences are historically well documented. Mass sightings of the Virgin Mary are common, and as a Protestant, Habermas is unlikely to attribute all of them to actual manifestations of Mary. For example, on June 24, 1981, six children reported an appearance of the Virgin at a hilltop near the town of Medjugorje in Bosnia-Hercegovina. She has continued appearing regularly to these individuals since that time, and millions of others have made their pilgrimages to the site to experience visions, healings, and other supernatural events. Could it be that the power of suggestion is at play?

Note that I am not here arguing that Jesus' followers necessarily experienced a mass hallucination, but I am merely establishing its possibility, contrary to the assertions of Resurrection apologists.

Third, some have claimed that if the anti-Christian Jewish authorities had wished to disprove Jesus' Resurrection, they could have simply exhumed Jesus' body and paraded him through the streets of Jerusalem for all to see.

However, the New Testament mentions no public proclamation of Jesus' Resurrection until seven "short weeks" after Jesus' alleged Resurrection. If there was concern about the deterioration of Lazarus' body just four days after his death (John 11:39), then Jesus' body must have been unrecognizable after seven weeks. Parading such a decomposed body through the streets of Jerusalem would have proven nothing.

Apologists have advanced a number of other arguments in favor of Jesus' Resurrection: 1 Corinthians 15:3 preserves an early tradition of the Resurrection; there were no competing burial traditions other than the one presented in the Gospels; there was no early tomb veneration site; no one making up a story at that time would make women into the first eyewitnesses; there was no precedent in Jewish thinking for such an event as Jesus' Resurrection (and therefore it must not have been made up); and so on, I particularly like how Robert Price takes apart each of these arguments in his provocative collection of essays entitled Jesus is Dead. You may contact me for a copy if interested.

MuttleyLaff:
You dont have to. Was only saying it got me cracked up earlier this morning when reading your comment on the dry fasting thread

On the contrary, it actually is you getting and being desperate, then go marry your own, not be coveting what is someone's else. I have already told you that besides God stopping the practice, science has backed up the reason why it is advisable to indulge in incentous relationships, but you winged it with how about if they arent going to breed? You desperate there with that angle, but you are cornered. There is no way the son will have his father's blessing to marry his mother. "Agbedo" loosely translated means "it just wont happen, it isnt going to happen"

You see God always has a foresight and He knew same sex relationships will eventually happen, so He by design, gave both male and female their individual G-spots. Bro, there is nothing tufiakwa there jor. If there is, then spell out what the tufiakwa is really. What exactly is the tufiakwa. Say it now, arent you a man?!

kkins25:
There is nothing I love more than see a Christian tell us why he thinks God did this or that. The way Christians can read God's mind even before he created humanity really baffles me. The female center of gravity(clitoris, which is the equivalent of the base of a males penis) is even in the wrong position.

kkins25:
God has forced men to use their tongue to obey his commandment;
Corinthians 7;4-5
"The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. And likewise the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does"

kkins25:

God has forced men to use their tongue to obey his commandment;
Corinthians 7;4-5
"The wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. And likewise the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does"

MuttleyLaff:
The female center of gravity, clitoris according to kkins25, is not the equivalent of the base of a male's peniis, yet another gaffe made by kkins25

What are you trying to say with this section? It is not clear.

MuttleyLaff:

You see God always has a foresight and He knew same sex relationships will eventually happen, so He by design, gave both male and female their individual G-spots. Bro, there is nothing tufiakwa there jor. If there is, then spell out what the tufiakwa is really. What exactly is the tufiakwa. Say it now, arent you a man?!

kkins25:
Haha. This man and his search engine for errors. To avoid the gaffe, according to muttleylaff, i should have elolborated more.
Firstly, center of gravity should have been in quotes. Or don't you agree that the clitoris is the most sensitive part of the female reproductive organ?

Now what i meant was and is- that the position of the clitoris makes it almost impossible to be stimulated by the penis through the "holy sex position" of so called God. A design flaw if you ask me.this is in response to your comment

kkins25:
On "God has forced men to use their tongue to obey his commandment" ;
Corinthians 7;4-5 The center of gravity on the other hand is even less likely to be stimulated by the penis also through the "holy sex position of God". After all, most women don't know what orgasm is. However if we go by the devil's way and utilise the mutually existing doggy style, then we might be getting somewhere. Still the clitoris would likely not get the attention it craves. Hence my mockery of the book of Corinthians 7:4.

It is Gods law that the man should satisfy his wife's sexual needs(Corinthians 7;4). My comment "God has forced men to use their tongue to obey his commandment" on Corinthians 7:4 was actually saying that in order for men to satisfy the cravings of the clitoris men are been forced to use their tongue in place of the penis. I was messing around, Pardon me.
We must thank lucifer(if he even exists) or more accurately Azazel and his league of angels for the sex education he came down with from the heavens.
Since you happen to know what God thinks could you tell us why God decided to place those center of gravity in positions where the penis can hardly reach?

Pastoraio that's not what I was referring to. However,if God's(yaweh) system of government only nourished hypocrisy in the hearts of men. Dont you agree? He himself acknowledges it. Thanks to the verse you quoted.
I've always wondered why Solomon-even after all the wisdom stil fell out of grace.

MuttleyLaff:
My "What are you trying to say with this section? It is not clear." was not in relation to this section, the remark was directed at the Corinthians section bit, whereby you couldnt even reference the verse correctly omitting whether you are quoting first Corinthians or second Corinthians

You still are at it, making the same mistake, you still havent recognised that the clitoris is the equivalent of the peniis, and that the center of gravity is 2/3 inside the body of both the female and male.

This is not a design flaw, it came about out from a deliberate design thinking.

It is because you want a quick fix and dont want to work, that you revert to giving head, this thing is a marathon baby, not a sprint, stop taking short cuts.

Ah, God help you because giving head is not for everybody, God help you if you have cuts in your mouth, and there is accessible entry to wander into the bloodstteam through the cuts. Do you want me to go on, do you want me to share more on the male and female G-spots?

It is this section my "What are you trying to say with this section? It is not clear." was in relation to and my remark directed at

Waterlrd:
May l say hi to everyone in this page, lam so happy to meet you guys and my special thanks goes to joseph1013 for creating this wonderful thread that doesn't only affect the mind but the soul and the spirit.
I got a little worried when l skimmed through some post here with extraordinary intellectual composition but with little or what l could describe as ''unfiltered knowledge'' a mere logical assertions at that.

PastorAIO:
What if I am a masochist. What if I like to feel pain? Would that make it okay to inflict pain on others too? You see this universal teaching can be misleading if taken superficially.

PastorAIO:
What if I stole something as a kid and was flogged to within an inch of my life, and then decades later I looked back on it and reflected on it that 'thank god for that flogging, otherwise who knows whether I would be a thief by now'? Would that therefore make it okay if I then flogged my kids to the point that they are just hoping to die?

PastorAIO:
Most people's interpretation of this phrase 'do unto others...' is based on their basest desires where they would like to be pampered to and achieve without striving. They do not appreciate tough love.

PastorAIO:
Another one worth thinking about it Forgiveness. I find that when people get forgiven too easily they do not grow or learn any lessons. But when a situation is allowed to be irredeemable and the perpetrated gets to really stew in the remorse of doing whatever they did, the result is a very deep personality change for the better.

kkins25:
ohh yes. Ooops my bad. Forget about that, let's talk about the stuff you down down here

kkins25:
I didn't say the clitoris is not the equivalent of the peniis.

kkins25:
I asked a simple question, what is the most sensitive part of the female organ with respect to sexual pleasure. Between the gspot and the clitoris which has studies confirmed to produce more orgasm? No big grammar abeg. Just choose one.

kkins25:
The G-SP0T you like mentioning self are you aware that it is subjective? Some women don't fill shit when the peniis's stubborn head scrubs it. Also it can't even be stimulated unless a devilish position(according to some Christians) is used.

kkins25:
Most men also do not find it pleasurable to stick anything into their ass?

kkins25:
How good of God to be so perfect that he put the male gspot some inches in the ass where Adam the original never imagined and never dreamt of. I most handed it to your God.. clap! Clap!! Clap!!!...

kkins25:
As for me and most other men, our gspot is where evolution placed it - the soft, tender head and neck of the peniis. Yeah, it works pretty damn well.. Or wait a minute, God knew one day gays would arise so he put up the gspot in the ass?? I might be wrong afterall. It was a perfect designed.

kkins25:
says the mighty muttleylaff, matatron of The Lord his God. I think God put the clitoris there so two girls can "classically scissor" each other. Hallelujah.
What about the caudal bone, what about the appendix, what about the limited visual prowess of the human eyes. Huh What about spontaneous chromosomal mutations, huh?

kkins25:
A quick Q&A, was this knowledge incoperated into the genome when Sky daddy moulded Adam? Did Eve ever imagine what an orgasm would be like?

kkins25:
God help you too that when engaging in the "marathon of the Lord" you don't wear and tear up the innocent tongue craving vagina of your spouse. Tell me, supposing Adam was the marathon dancer, what did he use as lubricant? Dust mixed with breath and water

kkins25:
And no please i know enough already. I dont mind videos of you showing us how to "do it" the Lords way though.

MuttleyLaff:
Pull a chair and by the time we close, you can put the talk down to not only receiving succinct bible education but also getting proper physiological undertanding of the human body and correct sex education as well

"The female center of gravity (clitoris, which is the equivalent of the base of a males joystick) is even in the wrong position.
God has forced men to use their tongue to obey His commandment;"
- by kkins25(m): 12:03pm On Jan 18

kkins25, here is what are, in light of your above inverted commas quote, make sure you respond to all questions below without absconding:

1/ Do you not see how you have brazenly made and expect those in the know, to roll over, turn a blind eye and not challenge your elaborated contrived tissues of make believe farce?

2/ Do you not know that female centre of gravity is different to the female center of gravity, where the female center of gravity happens to be the centre of female sexual pleasure?

3/ Do you not know that clitoris is the equivalent of the male peniis, and is not the equivalent of the base of the male peniis?

To avoid the gaffe, according to muttleylaff, i should have elolborated more. Firstly, center of gravity should have been in quotes.

4/ Do you not know that because both the female and male G-spots are two thirds way into their respective bodies, and that in order to massage the G-spots, by stimulating it with the tongue, one will need to be in possession of an unusually and extremely long human tongue?

5/ Do you now, understanding, the location of the center of gravity, serves as a typical example of working at it, that to get it stimulated, is a marathon exercise, at which you keep on working at it, keep bumping and grinding until when that pleasurable ultimate excitement orgasmic and explosive plateau is reached?

5/ Do you at all really know the difference between the male and female centre of gravities at all?

7/ Did you know that all peniises actually start off as clitorises?

8/ Do you at all know that both the male and female G-spots are located towards the belly?

9/ Do you know at all that the orgasm of your partner can be reacher quicker than doing penetrative sex?

10/ Are you at all aware that women experience an intense, deep orgasm different to ones achieved through penetrative sex or clitoris stimulation?

The center of gravity for me! The center of gravity for me all the way, any time any day and that is talking from seeing and knowing that stimulating the center of gravity produces more ecstastic orgasm more than when the clitoris is being touched and this is from first hand experience(s) and not hearsays or studies you have read.

Exactly, that is why it is work, it is a marathon. Some women don't fill shiit when the peniis's stubborn head thrusts on it, because the thrusting requires to be kept at it long enough for orgasm to be uncovered.

You are advancing a false notion that all male same sex relationships involves penile penetrative sex. Besides, both female and male center of gravity stimulations can be done without penetration

What you are oblivious of is that both the female and male G-spots are homogeneous and located in the same part of the human body, only that, one can be accessed internally from the front and the other one, from the rear.

b]You have merely just put on public display, for all to see and read, how less knowledgeable you are on and about the male and female G-spots.[/b] Clap! Clap!! Clap!!!

MuttleyLaff is not Metatron, let's be clear on that.

It is a conscious decision that made God put the homologous female and male G-spots, located towards the belly and both under the bladder, 2.5-3 inches into female body via the front and 2 inches into the male body via the back. Now the beauty is that, aside from the inside, both can be stimulated from the outside. Isnt that thoughtful and nice of God, huh?

Adam knew Eve, he didnt just go into Eve kkins25. There is a huge difference in both. Are you married at all? If not then, are you with a steady partner sexually active?

Two minutes thrusting isnt enough time to get a woman satisfyingly aroused and orgasmised

From all you've posted so far on this thread, I can tell you're not only a fast-paced sex wham-bam-thank-you-ma'am male anyway but you are also not knowledgeable as you seem to want to make yourself believe you are. I can tell you have never in your life, giftedly brought any woman to squirt before. I can tell you havent left a woman writhing and peaking from a marathon work of successful ultimate center of gravity stimulation before.

I have no beef wiith anyone, if giving head is their thing, all I am saying is, if they have a weak or failing immune system, then God help them and their bloodstream, if with cuts or damage tissue in the mouth, they bend down doing tongue

As you can see, you know nada really. Hahaha ha. And I havent even scratched the surface of this whole matter sef