Mickael2:




Edin Dzeko fell out of favour towards the end of his Citizens career as his relationship with staff deteriorated. He said: “In my last season [at City], I didn’t play a lot and I didn’t have the best relationship with [manager Manuel] Pellegrini.

“I wasn’t happy about that because I knew my qualities and I wanted to play more as those were my best years.


Read more at http://www.squawka.com/en/news/edin-dzeko-explains-why-he-had-to-leave-manchester-city/1030663#8bS9mcJAHggCwKH4.99


As a Citizen I would expect that you would know that as at then Dzeko was quite vocal about the fact that he was sitting on the bench for Aguero and the coach took offence with that, I even told you severally then that Aguero isn't world class and I personally do not know why he started ahead of Dzeko. The coach saying that they let him go is just to cover up, knowing fully well that Pellegrini isn't the type that says much to the press

Mickael2:


That was three seasons ago, he has been poor for the past two seasons. But the point anyways isn't about an EPL club signing him, it was about the dude trying to diss Perez

andrew444:


Not going back to my statement okay because I know what I said

Perez had a nightmare at Arsenal ,seems you don't get me then google is there for you

Nothing much to say to you for now till you bring up another hate speech .

Mickael2:




Edin Dzeko fell out of favour towards the end of his Citizens career as his relationship with staff deteriorated. He said: “In my last season [at City], I didn’t play a lot and I didn’t have the best relationship with [manager Manuel] Pellegrini.

“I wasn’t happy about that because I knew my qualities and I wanted to play more as those were my best years.


Read more at http://www.squawka.com/en/news/edin-dzeko-explains-why-he-had-to-leave-manchester-city/1030663#8bS9mcJAHggCwKH4.99


As a Citizen I would expect that you would know that as at then Dzeko was quite vocal about the fact that he was sitting on the bench for Aguero and the coach took offence with that, I even told you severally then that Aguero isn't world class and I personally do not know why he started ahead of Dzeko. The coach saying that they let him go is just to cover up, knowing fully well that Pellegrini isn't the type that says much to the press

TheGoodJoe:


He said Perez was poor, you provided report Perez was poor. So what is your problem?

TheGoodJoe:


Pellegrini plays with two strikers most of the time. What you are writing there does not contradict Pellegrini's point.

"We let Jovetic and Dzeko go because I see Kelechi every day and know what he can do. I am very happy... Manuel Pellegrini.

Mickael2:


So why exactly are you now skipping the fact that Perez scored three goals in the UCL? Bros, next time before you start talking or using examples check your facts so you won't be seen as a troll. That Perez comparison is totally wide of the mark. And to think that you actually compared Perez's season at Arsenal with Iheanacho's current season for Leicester shows just how much you despise Arsenal and everything Arsenal, hate isn't good

andrew444:


Lol see as you dey cover up your hate

Perez had a Arsenal nightmare with lesser game time

Seems you said I called Perez a flop why not bing out the place where I said that

So using Perez as an example of a player who things didn't work out with at Arsenal means I compared him to iheanacho?

Bros if you can't understand things then you can use the help of google

Lol, you are now saying I despise Arsenal ? But always supporting iwobi

Bro you are clueless ,you are twisting things because it didn't go your way

Try harder

Curtisaxel7:


That is what you get when competition is non existent.

How can a national team player be in China division 2 for hell's sake?. What the fawk!.

Danielnino00:


Its time Rohr throws that no.9 role open..... if Iheanacho and Success can't challenge Ighalo for the shirt then call ups should be handed to Stephen Odey,Paul Onauchu,Dennis Bonaventure, Emem Udok,Blessing Eleke and even Tony Nwaekeme. They are playing at a higher level than Ighalo and scoring goals too

Mickael2:


You know perfectly well that Aguero and Dzeko could not start at the same time. Back then Aguero was a true 9, it is funny because you are the one who has always pointed out that Aguero had to develop his all round play for him to play for Pep so how are you now telling me that Aguero and Dzeko could start at the same time na

andrew444:


I agree with you bro

To be sincere success and nacho are not doing enough to challenge ighalo at all .

TheGoodJoe:


Pellegrini was at Villareal. Took over the team when they got promoted and led them to the Champions league semi finals where they crashed out to Arsenal after Roman Riquelme missed a penalty that would have taken them to the finals against Barcelona. He had Senna, Sorin, Riquelme, Carzola, Forlan in that team.

Coached Malaga. When he took over them, they were number 20 on the table. When he was done with them, they reached the semi finals of the Champions league and his best work was with Isco.

Mickael2:


Let me try to make this as simple as possible.

If you are flopping at the big clubs, the fact that you are in a big club is a big deal. In Iheanacho's last season in Manchester he flopped real bad but Leicester still played big money for him. Bony flopped big team at City but Swansea paid big for him, that's the way it goes. But you can never find a player who flopped at a midtable club who will make a high profile transfer to another club in the EPL. If Iheanacho was still in City playing like this he would still easily get a club but from Leicester that's where the problem is.

elyte89:



I disagree... Success has barely played a full 90min action with super eagles, let him play like two full matches b4 we decide to relegate him to nacho level if he doesn't perform.

I believe d likes of osimhen,odey,success shld b given more chance while nacho shld b excuse for now till he pick up his form

Mickael2:


Where is Jovetic now? I never considered him a proper talent by the way. Please do not make it look like Dzeko was shown the door because of Iheanacho, if Dzeko stayed he would have been second choice behind Aguero and he didn't want that which was why he left to Roma, why would you get an offer from Roma and still want to remain a bench piece at City? He benched Bony no doubt but we all know where Bony is now.

Anyways do I need to explain to you that the pressure that comes with managing West Ham is different? Every missed chance, every lost point is precious, ain't no coach who will be willing to take that risk. However I do not know Pelligrini so I don't know what he would want to do but factually there is no space at West Ham, Carol, Arnautovic and Hernandez are making sure of that and they have not tabled any offer for him, you can't go where you are not wanted

Mickael2:


You know perfectly well that Aguero and Dzeko could not start at the same time. Back then Aguero was a true 9, it is funny because you are the one who has always pointed out that Aguero had to develop his all round play for him to play for Pep so how are you now telling me that Aguero and Dzeko could start at the same time na

komekn:


You forgot to mention the very versatile Antonio.

andrew444:


Oga I didn't say iheanacho will be sold for big money.

Iheanacho didn't flop in his last season at mancity stop lying bro ,if you think you are not lying then you don't know the meaning of flop

Someone that pep didn't give much game time but he still manage to get goals and you are here saying he flopped at his last season ,yes iheanacho is flopping now no doubt ,but does that means he flopped at his last season at mancity ?

You are just making people see you as a hater

Someone scored 9 goals in all competition in his last season with very few minutes and you call it flop ? 2 of those goals are in the champions league group stage,he even scored in the Manchester derby and assisted

How many goals did you expect him to score you expect him to score 20 goals while playing few minute ?

Oga if you wan lie for player head lie well okay .

andrew444:



Okay agreed

Pls I didn't relegate him to nacho level abeg

I quote what the guy is trying to say that's all so please don't start unnecessary argument.

bigblangston:


I have been reading your debate with Mikael since yesterday and it has been so interesting so far, but there is one thing I need to correct is that Riquelme missed a penalty that would have taken villareal to the finals which is totally untrue.

Arsenal won the first leg by a lone goal and that was the the year Jens Lehman was in top form. Riquelme’s penalty would have given hope for villareal to get to the finals by dragging Arsenal Fc to extra time or penalty shootouts or even a second goal before stoppage would have ensured the passage of villareal into the finals not that penalty Riquelme missed as you claimed, you have been going about that Riquelme penalty claim for long but I just decided to correct it. Keep up the good work Joe. Chriskels! I hail you from this side

komekn:


It's a question if semantics and context.

The context or Manchester city and the measurement of success are very different from say Leicester and Burnley.

It's not just goals but the very exacting standards required by Pep. Standards he failed to meet so he failed at city or you can say he flopped the choice is yours.

But as for HATE that's in your own self perception not everyone here. And of course you will label me a hater l am sure.

Mickael2:


I am not even arguing that. OK Perez was poor but he still had better stats than Iheanacho in the season under review so if he was poor am I wrong if I say Iheanacho was poor too? Then he called me a hater

TheGoodJoe:


Look at Michail Antonio's preferred position and you want him to drag nine role.

TheGoodJoe:


Thanks for the correction. Some times memory do fails. Either way, epic game from an epic era.

komekn:


Is this really a matter of discussion❓ it's simple abc, maybe people don't want the truth well at least some don't.

Then they will label you HATER.

elyte89:




Who wan argue with u ,abi na u use ur aggressive mind read my statement

Even if a statement says ..."gud morning "...u still fit twist am to argument

TheGoodJoe:


Nacho did not fail at City. He had a brilliant time. It was Guardiola's system which required time for Nacho to adjust to. Nacho could not wait and moved. That does not equate to failing or you want to write off his brilliant rise at City and the time under Pellegrini?

andrew444:


I agree with you bro

To be sincere success and nacho are not doing enough to challenge ighalo at all .